editor said:Let's get it straight. You're suggesting that the QC made it all up and is bare faced liar?!!! I hope you have some powerful evidence to back this up otherwise you're knee-deep in defamatory territory.
Seeing as Mrs Kelly has confirmed her thoughts directly elsewhere perhaps you might finally offer some compelling evidence as to why she or her QC were lying:
What a bloody wriggler! He never suggested that for minute. There's not even any chance of logically arriving at your thinking.
No i believe he was pointing out to you that you had said kelly's wife had made her views be known via a statement from her QC, in court.
Now you're reduced to quibbling about her having "confirmed her thoughts directly elsewhere"!!!! So did she confirm her thoughts, and confirmed them directly mind, to her QC, via the court, or somewhere else?
Have you changed you mind, and now say she made her thoughts be known 'elsewhere'? Where exactly did she confirm her thoughts? And is confirming her thoughts the same as speaking?