Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

"Did two hired assassins snatch weapons inspector David Kelly?"

I think David Kelly was hit by Princess Diana's car which had temporarily ripped through a space/time portal.
 
The case is inconclusive and debate is necessary.

The inquiry into his death was dodgy as fuck.

Anybody who says it's definately not murder is motivated by something other than the facts.

If I was the Prime Minister and was sure that there was nothing dodgy going on I would of had the most thorough and transparent inquiry possible with a judge who was impartial.
 
Well, they were on the way to Atlantis after all. I hear asylum seekers ate a swan as well as Kelly's prescription drugs too
 
butchersapron said:
Where has this 'two hired assassins' stuff come from?
Straight out of the writer's vivid imagination, of course!

There's not even the teensiest weensiest scrap of evidence to support the "two hired assassins" claim but - hey! - don't let that get in the way of the story!
 
DrRingDing said:
If I was the Prime Minister and was sure that there was nothing dodgy going on I would of had the most thorough and transparent inquiry possible with a judge who was impartial.

All judges are assumed to be impartial barring a personal connection with the case. What makes you think Lord Hutton wasn't?
 
DrRingDing said:
Disrupting threads with childish antics?

Surely not.
This coming from the poster who insists that anyone and everyone who fails to nod their heads in wholesome agreement with his wild, evidence free claims about murder can only be "motivated by something other than the facts."

Perhaps you might elaborate on this startling claim please?
 
butchersapron said:
And cut his wrists on the brambles on the way down?

I have no doubt he killed himself but the pressure that he was under probably tipped him over the edge. Not only was he under fire from the government but from the BBC. Alastair Campbell is a vile little man who's got blood on his hands as far as I am concearned. The Hutton Inquiry stinks.

Bullied to death imo.
 
fela fan said:
The mail is shite, but even shit can come up with perfume sometimes.
Really? Could you give some examples of shit turning into perfume please because I've never heard of such a thing?
 
butchersapron said:
Well you two are both very quick on the uptake today. Oh no a jpoke about fela thinkiing shit makes a good perfume. Oh no. How domineering.

Just what is a jpoke? Is it a joke or a poke? Or is it both?

Are you single then butchers? Go on, tell us, it seems important to you. Are you? Does it make a difference to your debating skills?
 
untethered said:
All judges are assumed to be impartial barring a personal connection with the case. What makes you think Lord Hutton wasn't?

Assummed by who? Not me.

Great, Untethered on a loon thread.
 
editor said:
Straight out of the writer's vivid imagination, of course!

There's not even the teensiest weensiest scrap of evidence to support the "two hired assassins" claim but - hey! - don't let that get in the way of the story!

Perhaps O J Simpson could write a book about how he would have done it if he had.
 
editor said:
Really? Could you give some examples of shit turning into perfume please because I've never heard of such a thing?

Go on editor, expand your mind. Try just a bit harder and you never know what you might find out...
 
How come 2 assassins? and not 1 or 3 or 7?

Nowt in the OP suggests 2. Or "hired" for that matter.

tbh, I reckon elements of the secret state could quite easily have bumped him off, but the sort of stuff in the OP doesn't really make that any more plausible or implausible.

ho hum.
 
editor said:
This coming from the poster who insists that anyone and everyone who fails to nod their heads in wholesome agreement with his wild, evidence free claims about murder can only be "motivated by something other than the facts."

Well I hope you have soem evidence to back up those highly dishonest claims.

If you haven't I expect an apology. Or is that below you?
 
fela fan said:
Go on editor, expand your mind. Try just a bit harder and you never know what you might find out...
I'm pretty sure I could look at shit for hours and hours and it'll never turn to perfume, so why don't you explain what you're on about?
 
fela fan said:
So, when you get evidence, that allows you to form an opinion eh? Surely evidence is proof is objective stuff is unarguable? How can you have an opinion about evidence?
No, I have an opinion alright. I think the whole thing is dodgy as fuck mate. However, until I have some evidence simply posting a link that contains nothign more than a load of other people's opinion I'm not going to bother, as they would quite rightly point out that these conjectures (thanks DF) are merely that, and useless in the battle to bring some bugger to justice without, wait for it, evidence.
fela fan said:
Do you have an opinion about the earth being round, and gravity speeding on at 9.8m/sec?? And what's your opinion about the sun being hot?

Well, my opinion on the Earth being round is that it's a very good shape for it, that gravity's speed is far too fast for comfort, and the heat of the sun is quite nice during summer but a bit nippy in the winter.
 
DrRingDing said:
Well I hope you have soem evidence to back up those highly dishonest claims.

If you haven't I expect an apology. Or is that below you?
You're talking gibberish boy. Make some sense!

Oh, and could you answer my question please?
 
editor said:
This coming from the poster who insists that anyone and everyone who fails to nod their heads in wholesome agreement with his wild, evidence free claims about murder can only be "motivated by something other than the facts."

Perhaps you might elaborate on this startling claim please?

Editor earlier today: said:
"I'm a deep sea Umbrellamouth Gulper named Cyril who has a fixation with ice cream enemas."

Perhaps you might elaborate on this startling claim please?
 
bluestreak said:
No, I have an opinion alright. I think the whole thing is dodgy as fuck mate. However, until I have some evidence simply posting a link that contains nothign more than a load of other people's opinion I'm not going to bother...

And so this is where we part company then. Of course it's dodgy as fuck mate, but if you really think you're going to personally happen along some evidence to back up this opinion then you're the naive person mate. You, or me, or any other common person ain't never gonna get no evidence. As you oughta know, the elites don't pass that on down.

You can never beat the elites with evidence, so if you want to beat them, how you gonna do it man? If you're a revolutionary, surely you don't expect to bring down the wealthy bastards legally???? Surely not...

Whoops, editing this. I assumed i was replying to butchersapron. I'll not bother changing anything. Perhaps it is time for bed for me. Rereading it, the reply seems still okay for bluestreak, but it remains aimed at the BA man.
 
DrRingDing said:
<load of idiotic gibberish removed>
Disrupting threads with childish antics?

Surely not.

Poor ol' RingDing. Hoisted by his own tabard and pwned again by his hypocrisy. :D
 
You're not going to bring down a state based on accusations either, I'm afraid.

I'm off home, ta-ra.
 
Back
Top Bottom