crossthebreeze
Well-Known Member
i agree - not at all!Yes, you're right. It's not quite the same as decriminalisation brothel-keeping, though.
i agree - not at all!Yes, you're right. It's not quite the same as decriminalisation brothel-keeping, though.
I'd suggest you don't too but that is a rather pointless path to take so why not stick to the actual argument. Again I'm not proposing mega brothels etc.. What is wrong with some women being able to rent a premises together?
Rented from whom? In reality, men would buy properties to run as brothels, keeping women there, and living off them. In reality, you'd be decriminalising pimping. Progress?
What happens when people lose there (sic) benefits for not applying for this 'work'?
i wouldn't be so confident being as they seem happy to sanction people for no reason anyway.I see no reason whatsoever why this would happen. I'm a vegan currently on benefits myself. If I were offered a job in a slaughterhouse I am very confident I could refuse to work there and NOT be sanctioned for doing so giving a moral objection to working there. Can you show me a documented (rather than 'my friend') example of where people in the UK have been forced to take jobs that they have a moral objection to doing so (since national service)? The issue is easily remedied by a clause in a bill to regularise such work specifically prohibiting benefits to be cut for this reason.
Given that the vast majority of sex workers wouldn't choose to sell sex if there was a viable alternative demonstrates that prostitution is coercive, and,therefore, an abuse of women.
Then they will just sanction people anyway and won't need this excuse.i wouldn't be so confident being as they seem happy to sanction people for no reason anyway.
probably best not to give them an excuse to sanction youThen they will just sanction people anyway and won't need this excuse.
non sequitur i think you'll findGiven that the vast majority of women in reduced circumstances in the UK do NOT work in prostitution then your claim is without merit.
By all means explainnon sequitur i think you'll find
Tbf thats benefit agency being the benefit agency rather than any policy.
They as a policy dont advertise sex work although it slips through in various versions and generally gets removed when people notice complain.
It would depend on the inspection regime holland apprantly has a problem with trafficed women in legal brothels if you are going to do it you have to do it properly with regular unannounced inspections inculding taxes etc etc etc.
So no you Have to declare earning pay tax etc have to be a legal immigrant medically fit etc etc etc.
Which is going to upset a lot of prostitutes but then you cant really have a legal status but avoid stuff like taxes etc.
it doesn't follow. just because the vast majority of women in straitened circumstances don't turn to prostitution doesn't mean that the vast majority of prostitutes haven't turned to sex work because they felt they had no viable alternative.By all means explain
Given that the vast majority of women in reduced circumstances in the UK do NOT work in prostitution then your claim is without merit.
1) not just workers should pay tax; 2) all economies are mixed economies so saying 'we live in a mixed market economy' is only stating the bleeding obviousYes workers have to pay taxes. We live in a Mixed market economy with taxes that are needed to pay for government services. Sex workers should pay tax.
it doesn't follow. just because the vast majority of women in straitened circumstances don't turn to prostitution doesn't mean that the vast majority of prostitutes haven't turned to sex work because they felt they had no viable alternative.
where i work our readers are frequently described as users which is i think even worse than customers.customers.
no we don't, most people are able to struggle on to the end of the sentence. oh: and 'they felt' is two words, not one.Ha now we rest on the word 'they felt'.
1) not just workers should pay tax; 2) all economies are mixed economies so saying 'we live in a mixed market economy' is only stating the bleeding obvious
yes, you strike me as the sort of person who needs it stated now and again.yes, not just workers should pay tax. you are stating the bleeding obvious
no we don't, most people are able to struggle on to the end of the sentence. oh: and 'they felt' is two words, not one.
yes, you strike me as the sort of person who needs it stated now and again.
This is patently nonense.
don't know about winning the internets but i do think you give boring the internet a good go.Well done. You have identified a typo. I should have said 'Phrase'. My bad, you win the internets.
Ok, so we are on ' they felt they had no viable alternative. to a situation that other women in their situation were coping with.
i keep looking at that and wondering what it is you're trying to say.Ok, so we are on ' they felt they had no viable alternative. to a situation that other women in their situation were coping with.
don't know about winning the internets but i do think you give boring the internet a good go.