Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
yes i just told you that i entered the thread yesterday'in this instance' - I'm aware you've posted in the thread previously
yes i just told you that i entered the thread yesterday'in this instance' - I'm aware you've posted in the thread previously
yes i just told you that i entered the thread yesterday
when you make out i've just started posting on a thread perhaps i do.yes I'm aware you just told me that too, you don't need to tell me that you've just told me something....
when you make out i've just started posting on a thread perhaps i do.
yeh. it's clear you mean something different to other people by 'entered'.and I didn't do that, I referred to this instance of you entering the thread as I'd already posted out I'm aware you've posted in this thread previously
yeh. it's clear you mean something different to other people by 'entered'.
so you say. but you still haven't thought about it when the answer was in your post. could you either answer the question i asked you or find something better to do - this is really rather tedious.It's a multi-page thread that has been going since Tuesday, you can 'enter' the thread more than once. You posted in the thread yesterday, you 'entered' it again today to make a snide comment. The context of 'in this instance' ought to have made that point clearer for you but apparently its taken you several posts to understand.
so you say. but you still haven't thought about it when the answer was in your post. could you either answer the question i asked you or find something better to do - this is really rather tedious.
so returning to that point, asking someone to "think about it"when the answer fucking obvious to anyone with more than the wit of a lobotomised slow worm can hardly be considered snide.well when you enter a thread to make a snide comment and then just carry on with politeness pedantry you tend to derail it, yes it is tedious and you caused it
so returning to that point, asking someone to "think about it"when the answer fucking obvious to anyone with more than the wit of a lobotomised slow worm can hardly be considered snide.
being as the question's "whose interests are served..." i suggest the answer's factual and not simply an opinion. perhaps you'd like to have a stab at answering it.unless you're arrogant enough to consider that only your own opinion is the 'correct' one here then it is pretty snide
being as the question's "whose interests are served..." i suggest the answer's factual and not simply an opinion. perhaps you'd like to have a stab at answering it.
very good and we're finally back on topicthere are multiple interests served by not allowing sex workers to operate partnerships ranging from opposition to sex work from religious groups, conservatives etc.. through to non sex workers who profit from operating their own premises and/or controlling sex workers.
I need to go smoke some weed...
Be curious about anything liberal or progressive in this country and you're fucked. It's the one thing that unites the Tories, Labour and SNP - no move on liberal issues such as sex work, 'right to die' or drug laws, issues which many other western countries aren't scared of discussing with a view to changing the status quo. A discussion in this country is just that, a tick box exercise, a nod to democracy and listening to other voices, but with no intent to change. Corbyn looks like the smallest puff of fresh air, but he may get kicked to death by his own party or if he survives to the next GE get a kicking then...