ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Blimey, and I thought that jazzz often showed a paucity of critical thinking. These people make him seem like a positive analytical marvel!
yea, i love it when they do that. Tyndall was always a great fan of doing that in his Spearhead columns.
John "Smith".
Aha! Not John Smithowitz-zionberg?
No, really, just John Smith
Blimey, and I thought that jazzz often showed a paucity of critical thinking. These people make him seem like a positive analytical marvel!
Speaking of Jazzz, where is he?
Still banging on about vaccination on Trashy's MMR thread...
Easier target, innit?
Jazzz said:I am stating it as my personal opinion. Scientifically, it's a hypothesis. Which you have done absolutely nothing to disprove.
Writing it down almost dehumanises it. I've been really struggling with reading the links that butchers posted back there ->
At first I thought it was the use of a serif font, so I copied the whole thing into a word doc sans serif so that it was easier to read. But I still haven't finished it (the longer doc).
Then you have that weird weird feeling about these places, and you don't know how to describe it. Because if you do, it sounds too spooky & unreal and you worry that people who haven't experienced will think you're either exaggerating or sentimental. But it's not like that, it's just that the 'acceptable' language we have to describe it doesn't do it justice.
Adorno's is an ethics and metaphysics "after Auschwitz." Ethically, he says, Hitler's barbarism imposes a "new categorical imperative" on human beings in their condition of unfreedom: so to arrange their thought and action that "Auschwitz would not repeat itself, [that] nothing similar would happen" (ND 365). Metaphysically, philosophers must find historically appropriate ways to speak about meaning and truth and suffering that neither deny nor affirm the existence of a world transcendent to the one we know.
Then you have that weird weird feeling about these places, and you don't know how to describe it. Because if you do, it sounds too spooky & unreal and you worry that people who haven't experienced will think you're either exaggerating or sentimental. But it's not like that, it's just that the 'acceptable' language we have to describe it doesn't do it justice.
Theodor Adorno said some interesting stuff about 'writing after Auschwitz'
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/adorno/#6
I've never visited any of the killing factories in Poland, but I've been to Dachau and Sachenhausen, places I have a familial connection to. Spooky and unreal describes it well enough. The evil and misery linger; it's palpable, hovering over those places like a cloud, even all these years later.
I'd imagine Auschwitz-Birkenau would be that, in spades. When the news broke about British students going there on educational day-trips, the denier forums were labeling it child-abuse.
An odd thing to call it, if nothing untoward happened there.
David Cameron was facing intense political criticism last night after including student “trips to Auschwitz” on a list of government gimmicks.
The Tory leader was resisting opposition calls to apologise about the reference to visits, organised by the Holocaust Educational Trust, in a list of “Gordon Brown’s 26 gimmicks” included in a speech.
The document, sent out in response to a similar list from Labour, of 50 Conservative achievements since 1997, included: “Honours for sportsmen”, “Prison ships”, “Deep cleaning of hospitals” and “New border police”. No 4 on the list was “Trips to Auschwitz”.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article3418653.ece
So no more legal threats from Nazi-fetishist antisemite Herr Kollerstrom then?
Dr Kollerstrom, 61, an honorary research fellow at University College London until Tuesday, stood by the claims this week, but expressed surprise that they had caused offence.
And he insisted the university “had not actually told me what’s so terrible about the article”.
He complained that he had been
accused of “thought-crime” after spending months researching it.
And he added: “If a smaller number were gassed, then surely the Jewish community should be pleased that it wasn’t so ghastly.”
.Dr Kollerstrom, of St John’s Wood, North West London, said he prefers to call himself a revisionist rather than a denier. Revisionists, he said, “want to look at European history without quite so much hate and bitterness”.
He also claimed he was the victim of “a calumny” by bloggers who had accused him of far-right sympathies and posted on the internet an image doctored to show him in Nazi uniform.
“I have some very good Jewish friends and have never had the slightest interest in the Nazi movement,” he said. “I never go to Germany. I have always belonged to things like the Green Party, CND and Respect.”
A UCL spokesman said: “The views expressed by Dr Kollerstrom are diametrically opposed to the aims, objectives and ethos of UCL, such that we wish to have absolutely no association with them or with their originator.
“We, therefore, have no choice but to terminate Dr Kollerstrom’s research fellowship with immediate effect.”
A source at the university also said that there had been concern at opinions Dr Kollerstrom had expressed regarding conspiracy theories over the July 7 2005 London bombings and the terror attacks of September 11, 2001. His areas of research include Newtonian theory and the 19th-century British discovery of Neptune. He is also the author of a yearly guide to Gardening and Planting by the Moon, which contains chapters on “Using the Star Zodiac” and “The Moon and Crop Yield”
Deaths on either side count.Further proof that he can't count, The UK hasn't suffered >1000 military fatalities in Iraq or Afghanistan.
The Kollerstrom Index
Nick Kollerstrom has quietly been publishing a huge body of work on the web. It ranges from the history of astronomy, to alchemy and astrology's relationship to metals, to horticulture and Moon cycles. For the first time, here are all the links collected together in one place.
Can I just add my concurrence with what those who've been to Auschwitz/Dachau etc have said about there being something wrong about the places. I'm Mr Materialist Atheist, but my experience of visiting Auschwitz and the ambience of the place...it's like something's deeply wrong with that part of reality...even tho I suspect that's imprinting of empathy based on knowledge of what's happened rather than any physical effects...