to be honest mate, i'd have no problem about attacking both.
Yeah, well i know where you're coming from mate, but it's not the best idea.
Best to attack the ideas than the person.
People come and go in history. It's ideas that stick or don't stick.
to be honest mate, i'd have no problem about attacking both.
good question cesare.
In the political climate that we live in, no worries at all.
But in the world i prefer, personally, quite a lot actually. I'd rather criticise the opinions than the person that holds them.
I actually suggest you wake up really. All this emotive ffs stuff is getting tiring.
Can you not hear so well? No, you can't, because you're just so emotionally involved in it all.
So the man said there was no holocaust...
Well, so bloody what.
He's clearly deluded. Why are you so fucked about it?
I think it's good that we can hear such views. They help cement more coherent views on the topic.
But you seem to want to censor thinking just because it doesn't coincide with your own views.
And considering that you have a media job, i find that frightening to some degree.
Too fucking subjective you are.
Attack the views, not the person eh?
Do you know the sound of one man yawning?
Fela, its emotive and distressing to you, another one of your truther twats is exposed as a Jew hating facist supporting cunt.
Its hilarious to me.
Yeah, well i know where you're coming from mate, but it's not the best idea.
Best to attack the ideas than the person.
People come and go in history. It's ideas that stick or don't stick.
What the fuck do you think has been happening for 30+ pages? Are you even reading the thread?
Well, maybe not. Easier to get emotive eh?
So is it a secret? Or are they simply in denial?
How many Jews were murdered, Fela?
My point is much more about objectivity than subjective shit. The ideas about the holocaust not having happened are patently absurd. So i just wonder why folk get so upset about patently ridiculous ideas?
However funny it is to you pk, it is not emotive or distressing to me. Nor do i have any sympathy with 'truther twats' either.
In fact i don't actually give a toss about such dreadful opinions. People have them, and however much hot air is blown about on these forums, such ideas ain't gonna go away.
My point is much more about objectivity than subjective shit. The ideas about the holocaust not having happened are patently absurd. So i just wonder why folk get so upset about patently ridiculous ideas?
However funny it is to you pk, it is not emotive or distressing to me. Nor do i have any sympathy with 'truther twats' either.
In fact i don't actually give a toss about such dreadful opinions. People have them, and however much hot air is blown about on these forums, such ideas ain't gonna go away.
My point is much more about objectivity than subjective shit. The ideas about the holocaust not having happened are patently absurd. So i just wonder why folk get so upset about patently ridiculous ideas?
I asked you some questions above fela - fancy answering them?
Maybe i'll bow out. Too emotional round these parts.
You just carry on.
Reputable academics usually give chapter and verse on the sources of those theories, though, Mr. 66. Dr Kollerstrom hasn't deigned to do so.
No, not really, not relevant.
When Kollerstrom lies about the experiences and the deaths of thousands on 9/11 and dozens on 7/7, I suppose it is a short hop from there to lying about 6m dead in the Holocaust. Personally, I think he came at it the other way.
Eh? It's *your* point though. That people should attack the idea not the person. It's 100% relavent to ask what this entails. So any answer?
My point, which you seem thus far to miss, is that it's better to hear such crap out loud, so that we can reject it.
That's the other thing that conspiraloons always do - the 'emotional' slur. Anyone who criticises them is 'emotional' or has some emotional investment in suppressing 'The Truth'.
Like they don't have deep, deep emotional involvement in the idea that the world is run by a shadowy cabal. Because it makes them feel better about their own high levels of paranoia and mistrust to project their own personal shit and feelings of inadequacy onto everything and call it proof of a conspiracy.
Puny human!Louis (glad he can't just turn his emotions on and off to order) MacNeice
Yeah, it's a short hop for him.
But, c'mon, how many people that read this drivel are going to be swayed by it?
My point, which you seem thus far to miss, is that it's better to hear such crap out loud, so that we can reject it.
That's the other thing that conspiraloons always do - the 'emotional' slur. Anyone who criticises them is 'emotional' or has some emotional investment in suppressing 'The Truth'.
Like they don't have deep, deep emotional involvement in the idea that the world is run by a shadowy cabal. Because it makes them feel better about their own high levels of paranoia and mistrust to project their own personal shit and feelings of inadequacy onto everything and call it proof of a conspiracy.