brogdale
Coming to terms with late onset Anarchism
This thread was better when you were just gratuitously abusive.Which is it? Come on, it’s a simple question, much simpler even than the ones on the form.
This thread was better when you were just gratuitously abusive.Which is it? Come on, it’s a simple question, much simpler even than the ones on the form.
Any objectors been knocked up by the 'goons' yet?
It was never gratuitous.This thread was better when you were just gratuitously abusive.
(QUOTE="brogdale, post: 17027007, member: 57590"]
** waves **
On that, we'll just have to agree to disagree, I'm afraid.It was never gratuitous.
Honestly have no idea how many field staff recruited and 'specially trained' by Adecco to conduct formal interviews under caution as required by the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) there are. Do you?So, you are still insulting thousands of workers as ‘goons’ then?
No. But I do know that none of them are employed yet, there are still adverts for that job up. So are you withdrawing the 'goons' insult in regard to those who are currently politely knocking on doors?Honestly have no idea how many field staff recruited and 'specially trained' by Adecco to conduct formal interviews under caution as required by the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) there are. Do you?
No you're wrong about that.No. But I do know that none of them are employed yet, there are still adverts for that job up. So are you withdrawing the 'goons' insult in regard to those who are currently politely knocking on doors?
Calling the specially trained field staff that conduct formal interviews under caution as required by the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) "goons"?Ok, I’m wrong they’re still being advertised, but they’re still not working. They’re called something like enforcement officers.
So are you going to withdraw your slur?
You’re avoiding the point again.Calling the specially trained field staff that conduct formal interviews under caution as required by the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) "goons"?
Nah.
If I had, I would. But I haven't, so there's no need.You’re avoiding the point again.
The people currently knocking on doors do not have those powers. So you’ll be apologising to them, no?
Really not sure what you're on about, tbh.I think you forget everyone can remember back as far as post 1137
Reminders don't come from posties, they come from census officers whose job it is to write down where they leave reminders etc (same as every time, but more techy this year)
I am surprised it would be done by a postie, unless you live somewhere weird, the rest sounds normal (I suspect the handheld device is a phone)I must have been hallucinating the postman delivering a reminder this morning then and logging something on his hand held device. Haz I been scammed by the postman?
I am nosey, but don't think I should be able to indulge it in this case!
Individuals can get individual codes which overwrites anything input by someone else and cant be seen by anyone else.
That's good, but how would anyone know it's possible?Individuals can get individual codes which overwrites anything input by someone else and cant be seen by anyone else.
I guess the main one-sheet letter is optimised for the most common kind of households, and if there was too much detailed information on it about less common types of household it would just be overwhelming for lots of people to take in and more likely to get binned. The info about getting filling forms in seperately was in the little "what you need to know" pamphlet that camein the envelope with the letter.That's good, but how would anyone know it's possible?
Well, here we go. I'm surprised that the unrelated adults figure is so low. Although now we have seen how the data is collected.....
Those figures sound about right to me, at least for the area I've been doing, and I have actually been knocking on doors to ask! It would be different in eg student areas of course, not sure how well information on those could ever be captured though as they are so transitory.View attachment 260754
Well, here we go. I'm surprised that the unrelated adults figure is so low. Although now we have seen how the data is collected.....