Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Barbara Ellen on "female on male" violence

Oh you're back. Unfortunately verbose as it is, your above declaration amounts to little more than bad stuff shouldn't happen.


So are we not individuals then? Capable of individual thought? That we shouldn't be categorised by gender. Did you even read the post?
 
What sort of violence have I claimed it to be?

In the context of your thread title, more endemic than it is. You've portrayed it (and by "it" we can only mean what Ellen admits to in the article you posted - drunken slapping- extrapolating anything else from her comment would, I'm sure you'll agree, be dishonest arsery) as a significant problem. It' isn't.
 
That is the jist of the article

In other words, you've interpreted Ms. Ellen's article to say that she's arguing for female on male violence.
Unfortunately for you, most others reading it, have interpreted it to say something entirely different. That she's admitting to having participated in such violence when drunk, and that in some circumstances, it may be excusable.
 
There was one paragraph where she acknowledged that some women do sometimes get physically violent but she doesn't say it's ok.

But, not near as bad as MOF violence. I say neither is acceptable and should not be played off one another!!!
 
In the context of your thread title, more endemic than it is. You've portrayed it (and by "it" we can only mean what Ellen admits to in the article you posted - drunken slapping- extrapolating anything else from her comment would, I'm sure you'll agree, be dishonest arsery) as a significant problem. It' isn't.

She is down playing FOM violence and well you know it. Unprovoked violence is wrong regardless of gender.

I haven't claimed that her position is neutral.
Her position is actually irrelevant to the point of whether or not your opening argument is at all accurate, though.

I never claimed you did.

If that is the point she is trying to put across why not just called like it is.

In other words, you've interpreted Ms. Ellen's article to say that she's arguing for female on male violence.
Unfortunately for you, most others reading it, have interpreted it to say something entirely different. That she's admitting to having participated in such violence when drunk, and that in some circumstances, it may be excusable.

How can it be excusable to attack some one unprovoked?
 
what's your position on acts of armed counterinsurgency by oppressed indigenous peasantry against the forces of the central state, ld222? Like in mexico maybe? (just an example, like.)

Is this the sort of stuff your talking about

'Delegate Zero' and the 'Other campaign'

Mexico welcomes Zapatistas' tour
_41176412_afp_marcos203.jpg

The Zapatista leader wants to be known as "Delegate Zero"
Mexico's government has welcomed a nationwide political tour by the Zapatista rebel movement, saying it will boost the county's democracy.
A spokesman for Mexico's president made the comments as the Zapatistas arrived in the southern city of San Cristobal de las Casas to address local groups.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4576438.stm

On The Trail of “The Other Campaign”
by John Gibler

CHIAPAS, Mexico - At the opening of the 2006 presidential campaigns in Mexico, one man stands out in front. He faces crowds of thousands in downtown plazas and town-hall meetings. He makes three stops a day, traveling up to eight hours in the backseat of a long, white van trailed by a caravan of over thirty cars. Scores of reporters and photographers from the national press corps follow him in a swarm of cameras and microphones held high.

But this man does not want votes, and he does not accept campaign donations. Sub-comandante Marcos, a balaclava-clad guerrilla rebel who has been in the jungle for over twenty years, wants to listen.

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0118-21.htm
 
She is down playing FOM violence and well you know it. Unprovoked violence is wrong regardless of gender.



I never claimed you did.

If that is the point she is trying to put across why not just called like it is.



How can it be excusable to attack some one unprovoked?
you piss on and on about 'violence' but you can't say what it is. pisspoor.
 
I think they meant more the shooting war.

The Zapatista Army of National Liberation (Ejército Zapatista de Liberación Nacional, EZLN), often referred to as the Zapatistas, is a revolutionary leftist group based in Chiapas, the southernmost state of Mexico.

Since 1994, the group has been in a declared war "against the Mexican state", although this war has been 'primarily defensive', against military, paramilitary and corporate incursions into Chiapas

What like the 'primarily defensive war' that the Zapatista's have been fighting against the big corporations and their allies in Mexico?
 
The Zapatista Army of National Liberation (Ejército Zapatista de Liberación Nacional, EZLN), often referred to as the Zapatistas, is a revolutionary leftist group based in Chiapas, the southernmost state of Mexico.

Since 1994, the group has been in a declared war "against the Mexican state", although this war has been 'primarily defensive', against military, paramilitary and corporate incursions into Chiapas

What like the 'primarily defensive war' that the Zapatista's have been fighting against the big corporations and their allies in Mexico?
See how the example of justified violence expands? From all violence is wrong to war is right in one step. You've just tied the rope around your own neck.
 
Back
Top Bottom