sorryNarcissists piss me off. And anyone who utters the word "triggering" is a bloody tool.
sorryNarcissists piss me off. And anyone who utters the word "triggering" is a bloody tool.
we should petition to rename the thread "general all-purpose whinging at the lefty commentariat thread (with extra bitterness)" and let's end the confusion, because it really would be bullying if every one of the endless number of posts here was just personally attacking Laurie for shits and giggles, but it's not like that, this thread goes off on all sorts of mad tangents now.
there's a relevant time and place for them. especially if you know what your target audience's triggerysubjects/odd things are. imo.Stavvers uses a lot of trigger warnings. I think it probably can be useful for some people... not really sure what to make of it.
Over used I reckon.
seeing as how it's been popping up in my dreams a few times i think it might be a Draugrthis thread will never die
I'm getting nowhere with this. You're probably decent people individually, but together you behave like a pack of playground bullies, and your lack of empathy is shocking. I've tried in good faith to engage; you'd be hard-pressed to find another columnist who would- and I regret ever doing so.
How about coining the term "Pennista" for all those who follow in the footsteps of our belovedMissMs. (money) Penny?
Every two months Laurie resurrects like a shit Jesus who nobody could even be bothered to betray.
I'm getting nowhere with this. You're probably decent people individually, but together you behave like a pack of playground bullies, and your lack of empathy is shocking. I've tried in good faith to engage; you'd be hard-pressed to find another columnist who would- and I regret ever doing so.
How many columnists is Paddick worth?*coughs* jayrayner *coughs*
Why's triggering bad language?Narcissists piss me off. And anyone who utters the word "triggering" is a bloody tool.
Why's triggering bad language?
Why's triggering bad language?
How many columnists is Paddick worth?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/1866274.stm
It's moronic anyway. There are journalists, writers, authors and all sorts on here. I remember that Naomi Klein liked to 'engage' back in the day, and still does afaik. Funny how she manages it without being a total dick eh? (awaits torrent of Klein is dick anecdotes). Apart from that, journos have always been trying to wheedle their way into' groups for one reason or another, whether it's for hatchet jobs or the gloriously naked careerism of the likes of Laurie.
As for the interesting playground bullies comment. My local primary and secondary schools don't even have playgrounds. Prefab classrooms have been plonked on them due to overcrowding. Check your gigantic posh school privilege Laurie.
Even if you are one? I've heard plenty of people use the word in completely reasonable contexts, such as "this text contains triggers for x, y and z". How's that pleading victimhood? If you ARE in fact a victim of say for instance rape?Because it's pleading victimhood?
Sorry, but that's a bit of a thin excuse. It might well be more of an Americanism, but unlike for instance "intersectionalism" it has an immediately obvious and clear meaning, no jargonistas need apply. And IME it's no more used to shut down debate than the words "class" or "capitalism".It's a pretentious word that's only used by pretentious people. I'd never heard of it before this thread. It's a word that's used to shut down debate.
Yup.What's the purpose? To flag things with the things they contain?
Even if you are one? I've heard plenty of people use the word in completely reasonable contexts, such as "this text contains triggers for x, y and z". How's that pleading victimhood? If you ARE in fact a victim of say for instance rape?
Yup.
this thread will never die
Of course there's the danger of abusing the concept. Doesn't make it a bad concept. Is racism a bad word because people misuse it?What if I am in fact a victim of being buried under a heap of buttons or having been stung badly by a wasp?
If you take this apparently fine idea to its logical conclusion, anything and everything should carry a trigger warning, just to be on the safe side.
I'm not sure where the term first became popularised. Either way, it's a bit too easy to sit here and say "no, you can't use the word "triggering" because that's you pleading victimhood."Maybe I'm missing the context of that penny quote.
Perhaps she found the content of what she read truly traumatising. It's from "trauma trigger", right?
Of course there's the danger of abusing the concept. Doesn't make it a bad concept. Is racism a bad word because people misuse it?
I'm not sure where the term first became popularised. Either way, it's a bit too easy to sit here and say "no, you can't use the word "triggering" because that's you pleading victimhood."