Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Alex Callinicos/SWP vs Laurie Penny/New Statesman Facebook handbags

Status
Not open for further replies.
Or dad dancing...
I think I've found out more about George Clooney in the last few minutes than I've ever known. No immediate chino links or dad dancing, but he's 4 months older than me. I thought he was in his 60s for some reason.
 
This does my head in Firky :

UK Uncut and UNITE Community's Ellie Mae O'Hagan welcoming Channel 4 gimmickry designed to elicit backlash and helping no one at all.
People who want to observe Ramadan fasting don't have alarm clocks so all they need to do is set on their TV ?!?? ???


https://twitter.com/MissEllieMae/status/352020599809376257

This is great. Nice one @Channel4ht


I don't understand why they are calling it a 'deliberate provocation', I would prefer that broadcast media endorsed no religious events but if they are going to endorse, cover and fawn over Anglican and Catholic goings on and celebrations then I don't see the problem with Ramadan but presenting it as they have seems irresponsible.
 
I fear they are calling it that precisely to deliberately provoke UKIP or the Council of Ex-Muslims or whoever.
Also Channel 4 are not going to fawn over Catholic goings on.

Should we expect a daily 5-minute Westminster Cathedral blessing after Mass session during Lent next year as part of their minority coverage? It's possible but unlikely IMO.
What do you think J Ed ?
 
I think I've found out more about George Clooney in the last few minutes than I've ever known. No immediate chino links or dad dancing, but he's 4 months older than me. I thought he was in his 60s for some reason.

A lot of women like the more mature man in my experience
 
I fear they are calling it that precisely to deliberately provoke UKIP or the Council of Ex-Muslims or whoever.
Also Channel 4 are not going to fawn over Catholic goings on.

Should we expect a daily 5-minute Westminster Cathedral blessing after Mass session during Lent next year as part of their minority coverage? It's possible but unlikely IMO.
What do you think J Ed ?

Or sabbath candle times announced on the news.
 
Or sabbath candle times announced on the news.

That's much less invasive would take at most 30 seconds it's a single time before sunset - far shorter than the whole ezaan.

Perhaps some mini-prayer calls from the Baha'i Kitab-i Akdas during the nineteen-day fast?

The problem is the Jedi community have failed - utterly failed - to impose any kind of fasting requirement on their followers. How can people take the religion seriously when they fail to do so? :mad:
 
The problem is the Jedi community have failed - utterly failed - to impose any kind of fasting requirement on their followers. How can people take the religion seriously when they fail to do so? :mad:

Call themselves a religion :mad: and they probably have the most programming :D
 
On a serious note, frogwoman, your religion is human freedom, do you get a daily broadcast at 5am in the morning and on the website.
Does Channel 4 let you or your followers announce the times and places of anti-cuts protests or gatherings to occur later in the day?

Good point. We could claim communism/socialism (or whatever you want to call it) was a religion and that the constant promotion of toryism was an insult to our beliefs. Like that guy who claimed religious discrimination about his beliefs on global warming ...

I think that ^ would be a crap idea lol just in case anyone thinks i'm actually suggesting it, but seriously ...
 
Should we expect a daily 5-minute Westminster Cathedral blessing after Mass session during Lent next year as part of their minority coverage? It's possible but unlikely IMO.
What do you think J Ed ?


I suppose that Channel 4 doesn't usually cover religious ceremonies, though the BBC does and has done for a while. I don't see why any of it is necessary, and they are obviously not doing this with good intentions for anyone other than themselves but if it was presented differently then it wouldn't be as bad as it is.

I would be interested to know what Muslims think of it, presenting Ramadan as a deliberate provocation doesn't exactly present the practice of their religion in a very good light.

I think we should get rid of all religious programming, faith schools and tax breaks for religious institutions and of course disestablish the church but until that point I'm not going to get too upset about Ramadan coverage on Channel 4 when there is coverage of Anglican ceremonies on BBC 2.
 
Well i find "songs of praise" etc bloody annoying. And I do agree with the point that if news/TV channels are going to broadcast loads of programmes to do with one religion (or broadcast programmes about religion at all) they should at least spend some time on broadcasting information about the other religions rather than just one (unless the other religions are in the news because a load of their followers have just been bombing people and thats the only reason its ever talked about, no "worship" programmes nothing else).

But there's a better way than this surely? the way its been marketed just seems to be a windup. If I was Muslim I'd be quite pissed off.
 
Personally I wouldn't have any of those annoying religious programmes like "Songs of Praise" at all, or maybe have one and then cover a different religion each week or something.
 
Well, the better way is to have a secular country that doesn't promote any religion through broadcast media, whether it's the state religion or not but when even atheists like Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg believe in belief we aren't going to get that are we?
 
Yeah my own feelings on religion are very mixed :D :oops: but I agree with you. I don't think any of them should be promoted tbh. I'm not sure why C4 are doing this.

Also does this mean Muslims are going to be bumped up the progressive stack now they have the "privilege" of a slot on C4?
 
I suppose that Channel 4 doesn't usually cover religious ceremonies, though the BBC does and has done for a while. I don't see why any of it is necessary, and they are obviously not doing this with good intentions for anyone other than themselves but if it was presented differently then it wouldn't be as bad as it is.

I would be interested to know what Muslims think of it, presenting Ramadan as a deliberate provocation doesn't exactly present the practice of their religion in a very good light.

I think we should get rid of all religious programming, faith schools and tax breaks for religious institutions and of course disestablish the church but until that point I'm not going to get too upset about Ramadan coverage on Channel 4 when there is coverage of Anglican ceremonies on BBC 2.

Unless you actually try to stop it from all angles, or put forward your culture of freedom as an alternative to fight against it, then the church will never be disestablished, the faith schools won't stop and religious programming will not end.

In practical terms the result will a rise of this kind of UKIP approach:- "The Anglican ceremony is, for all its ills, non-sex segregated men and women can listen to women priests together. The Muslim call is only ever performed by men to invite men to pray in the centre of the mosque with a man leading the routine, women can go to the tiny top floor or go pray in their home out of the streets. Go figure which one the lefties at Channel 4 love". It's the only result of this kind of 'provocation' - not to stop preconceptions about Islam, further deepen preconceptions about British society and media.
 
Unless you actually try to stop it from all angles, or put forward your culture of freedom as an alternative to fight against it, then the church will never be disestablished, the faith schools won't stop and religious programming will not end.

You are preaching to the choir to be honest ;) I agree with you wholeheartedly on what should be happening but any actual activism towards secularism seems like pissing in the wind and in any case seems to me to be a lot less important than other issues like fighting austerity.
 
You are preaching to the choir to be honest ;) I agree with you wholeheartedly on what should be happening but any actual activism towards secularism seems like pissing in the wind and in any case seems to me to be a lot less important than other issues like fighting austerity.

Sure but fighting austerity itself should be/is fighting for secularism against free schools which have a higher percentage of faith schools etc.
 
arg. i was dreaming about this thread last night. editor had changed the title to just 'laurie penny', because she'd said she was going to sue urbans for sexism and homophobia ('handbags' in the original title, and it wasn't originally just all about her).

er, yes.
 
arg. i was dreaming about this thread last night. editor had changed the title to just 'laurie penny', because she'd said she was going to sue urbans for sexism and homophobia ('handbags' in the original title, and it wasn't originally just all about her).

er, yes.

Obviously a dream, because as we've established many times now, it's always all about her - do keep up :facepalm:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom