rekil
to menny cranks
Now that's radical downtime.We smoked a joint in front of a photo of Che smoking a cigar, like some fractal of revolutionary kitsch.
Now that's radical downtime.We smoked a joint in front of a photo of Che smoking a cigar, like some fractal of revolutionary kitsch.
I tried to help with the dishes, but, as with most practical skills, I failed.
What the fuck?
cant quote for some reason
Anyway, your dismissal of 'identity' politics is getting desperate. You seem really, really anxious to convince yourselves that only the politics of white working class men is actually relevant to economic and social struggle. Those of us who are and who fight for women, people of colour and minorities don't call it 'identity politics', by the way. We just call it 'politics.'
.
You seem really, really anxious to convince yourselves that only the politics of white working class men is actually relevant to economic and social struggle.
The use of quota systems for *any* position doesn't tend to go well. Someone gets discriminated against with positive discrimination as well as the negative kind.@lauriepenny
Yes, the whole 'women in the boardroom' quota stuff really makes me angry. I feel that I'll never be judged solely on my merits, no matter how hard I work. I think it's also insulting to women who are already on boards.
So, let's see you take on rather than talk for the fawcett society.Well exactly- claiming that more women in the boardrooms will somehow solve gender equality conveniently brushes over the fact that the boardrooms are still the problem. It's feminism as a decoy for rampant neoliberalism, and I hate it. I honestly couldn't care less about women in the boardrooms. When are people going to start asking en masse whether a female cleaner, as opposed to a female banker, can 'have it all'?
I am an engineer. I do not describe myself as a female engineer because a man wouldn't describe himself as a male engineer. To describe someone's job or profession in context with their gender, and tie the two together, is the antithesis of what feminism set out to do.Well exactly- claiming that more women in the boardrooms will somehow solve gender equality conveniently brushes over the fact that the boardrooms are still the problem. It's feminism as a decoy for rampant neoliberalism, and I hate it. I honestly couldn't care less about women in the boardrooms. When are people going to start asking en masse whether a female cleaner, as opposed to a female banker, can 'have it all'?
What does that mean?Quota systems really aren't the problem. Structural inequality is the problem.
Quota systems really aren't the problem. Structural inequality is the problem.
Um, I've written loads of articles and a book and given umpteen talks about precisely this topic, the erasure of class consciousness in modern feminism.So, let's see you take on rather than talk for the fawcett society.