SpineyNorman
Inappropriate content removed
Personally I take offence when someone tells 13,000 people I'm a racist.
Love Detective is Normski?
You remember how, about 30 years ago, Neil of "The Young Ones" called everybody a fascist, and Rik denounced any action taken by any person reactionary?
I suspect it's something along those lines.
Personally I take offence when someone tells 13,000 people I'm a racist.
not only that, but apparently i'm a racist as well for sending laurie penny a link to an IWCA article on why identity politics are reactionary
It certainly makes it much easier for her to block people who question her shit reactionary politics
you didn't even read the article did you laura?
I don't particularly blame you for not wanting to engage with anyone in the thread, as it all probably just segues together, though it's not fair to say everyone here is reactionary. Only a few are.
Personally I take offence when someone tells 13,000 people I'm a racist.
'I attach no more credence to 'feminist epistemologies' or 'queer histories' than I do to 'Jewish Physics'. I don't think you make cohesive societies by erecting fences and demarcating debates in terms of 'valid' participants and modes of expression. '
Seriously, thank you. This is all I needed to read to understand that this thread a total and utter reactionary irrelevance.
Did you also consult the Samaritans when you wrote your reply and the article? or just when you edited the final piece? (assuming it was yourself doing the editing?)And the piece was edited with the help of The Samaritans.
I thought I told you to fuck off?
Interesting how that one gets an immediate answer but Delroy's and Butchers's perfectly reasonable and polite questions remain unanswered isn't it?
And can you explain why you blocked me and another twitter user for 'racism' after he posted this article (IWCA piece on the reactionary consequences of state multiculturalism)on twitter and I retweeted it please @lauriepenny?
I hope you realise that the person who posted that is a well respected veteran antifascist - seems libelous to me.
Don't get me wrong...I'm all for selective and tendentious quoting..
She'll interview Tommy Robinson but a former AFA group gets no platformed
Of course she fucking didn't, she saw the title and thought "They don't like multiculturalism, they must be a far-right group" perhaps you should have explained to her where the IWCA came from?
Well you will associate yourself with the IWCA.
I saw that. Absolutely unbelievable.
Hey Laurie you can't be a liberal and an anarchist at the same time y'know.
Of course she fucking didn't, she saw the title and thought "They don't like multiculturalism, they must be a far-right group" perhaps you should have explained to her where the IWCA came from?
The mind just boggles. This is like when Phil Dickens gave that speech to some conference or whatever, outlining the basic anarchist position against liberal state-led multiculturalism, and all the middle-class fuckwits had some sort of collective breakdown, calling him a racist etc.
That's a guy who spends half his life dodging death threats from maniac scouse nazi's, and a load of fucking middle-class liberals who haven't even so much as lifted a finger to resist the BNP and EDL calling him a racist. Just unbelievable.
EDIT Laurie, I assume you're lurking, by this logic you do realize that you're calling me, and practically every other militant anti-fascist in the country, a racist?
Everybody at your party
They don't look depressed
Everybody's dressin' funny
Color me impressed
Stayin' out late tonight
Won't be gettin' any sleep
Givin' out their word
Cuz that's all that they won't keep
Now I've answered Laurie's questions in good faith, perhaps you'd return the favour and answer a few of mine?
1) What do you think about the spat between the NUJ and the New Statesman? Are you a member of the NUJ?
2) Did the decision to run the advert from the homophobic christian group in the New Statesman make you reconsider working for them? And do you know where the proceeds of said advertisement ended up?
3) Why did you give Stephen Lennon of the EDL a platform, at a point when the EDL is in terminal decline and where his agenda, ie using you and other journalists to try and revive it (whilst getting a good free scran too) was blatant from the outset?
Laurie Penny, she who gives platforms to fascists and who works for a scabbing, homophobic liberal paper, scratching her head with bemusement at why a forum riddled with anarchists, anti-fascists, socialists and trade unionists are often critical of her.
The one thing they definitely don't teach in Oxbridge is self-awareness.
Not just political discussion, any type of discussion. Twitter is vacuous, for the attention seeking.This is one reason i have little time for twitter - it empties out and renders impossible even the potential for any kind of substantive and meaningful political discussion, presumably this is why the likes of Penny like it so much
Including yourself.
and i don't listen to shit like that. and that was your reply to a factual statement. and i told you to fuck off instead.
This is one reason i have little time for twitter - it empties out and renders impossible even the potential for any kind of substantive and meaningful political discussion, presumably this is why the likes of Penny like it so much
How come Laurie is prepared to answer other people's questions, but refuses to answer mine? I have no presumption at all about your answers and I'm not trying to con you in any way
Sure you've never attempted to have her read an article by Malatesta and been blocked as a fascist?How come Laurie is prepared to answer other people's questions, but refuses to answer mine? I have no presumption at all about your answers and I'm not trying to con you in any way
She didn't answer the question about whether or not she had consent from the disabled letter-writer either.How come Laurie is prepared to answer other people's questions, but refuses to answer mine? I have no presumption at all about your answers and I'm not trying to con you in any way
She didn't answer the question about whether or not she had consent from the disabled letter-writer either.