Tell us that full quote and pull the rug out from under your own point please.Funny that when posters up thread said Laurie had the kind of face you'd never tire of punching that didn't raise a flicker...but then it wasn't me saying it. Different standards apply to media ppl apparently
no doubt some of your closest friends are also black?some of my closest political comrades are women, and feminists.
I surprised he even lowers himself to post stuff like "a one woman effort to prevent premature ejaculation - her face = anti-aphrodisciac" for us mere mortals to read.echoes of Owen Jones's 'what do you do' there
Bitches better have my money.Don't know what you mean by "Mcfarlance" but some of my closest political comrades are women, and feminists - which you know damn well. But well done on your opportunist intervention here - you'd make an excellent leader of a lynch mob.
FFS its not that she is a woman...its that she is an arrogant m/c woman with a smug attitude. That look of disdain is a turn off
Perhaps by some weird process of osmosis, a bit of Galloway rubbed off on articul8 that time they swept passed each other in parliament.
Tbf I don't think articul8's comment is necessarily sexist, I mean yes women are more likely to have their looks commented on in general due to sexist assumptions but one individual making such a comment does not sexism make. I mean there are plenty of comments about various ugly smug male tories made on these. Also it's not so much her face in the sense of bone structure or whatever but that awful smug face she is making that.
Bitches better have my money.
It was sexist. 'The temerity of the woman, writing a sex advice column. What could she possibly know about sex? I don't fancy her'.
Exactly. A woman who wrote about sex, I better call her an ugly cow who couldn't make me cum.
Don't mind being flayed for what I believe in, but being misrepresented is something else
I was suggesting that someone whose smug attitude and shit politics were deeply unattractive to me was not best placed to write seductively about sex. Is this so wrong? Really?
I reckon he actually wants to bang her though...
Don't know what you mean by "Mcfarlance" but some of my closest political comrades are women, and feminists - which you know damn well. But well done on your opportunist intervention here - you'd make an excellent leader of a lynch mob.
I wonder he describes his 800 year old 30+ grand a year private school as "a minor independent school"?Tangentially related to this thread:
Cheers, David. He's quick to note that whilst he did go to "a minor independent school", his parents were polytechnic lecturers. What, no "and of course, I was on a scholarship"? Must have fallen off the page.
a one woman effort to prevent premature ejaculation - her face = anti-aphrodisciac
Tell us that full quote and pull the rug out from under your own point please.
Is it a sign of my inner patriarchal oppressor tendencies that every time I see a picture of her, I marvel at what a smug, punchable face she has?
no, still an ugly fucked fantasy about violence against women. Her face.
Not violence against "women" its a fantasy about violence against someone who happens to be a women.
If i say i would love to punch woody allen it isnt a violent anti semitic fantasy.
by which I meant
This is what I meant in the original post, but clearly there was enough room for malicious interpretation. Given my view above - she doesn't strike me as in the best place to be writing about sex in any way that would induce me to want to read it (this is what I meant by "seductively" incidentally).
a one woman effort to prevent premature ejaculation - her face = anti-aphrodisciac
Tell us that full quote and pull the rug out from under your own point please.