If there is a general strike then the people who work in the NHS will make sure that wards are staffed at the minimum level to ensure patients' safety.You talk about numbers like a manager. I am worried about the already poor standards of care. How will these remain unaffected?
If you don't wish to discuss something personal, then don't cite it as justification for an argument. Or people will conclude that you are using the age-old internet tactic of 'I am an authority on this I just can't tell you why'.
And I couldn't give a fuck what you would or would not give me because I think you are a right-wing cunt.
If there is a general strike then the people who work in the NHS will make sure that wards are staffed at the minimum level to ensure patients' safety.
Because of the way the NHS has been repeatedly fucked about with wards are currently staffed at a minimum level to ensure patients' safety.
Nothing will change.
Are you deliberately being difficult, or are you just fucking thick?
Like iI said, I didn't expect a personal question
Does anyone have any further details on the tax avoidance of Fortnum and Mason's owners (beyond that found here.
The overall tax charge for the year benefited from a £27m (2009 – £25m) credit for tax relief on the amortisation of non-operating intangible assets and goodwill arising from acquisitions. No tax arose on the profit on the sale of businesses or on the loss on disposal of non-current assets.
Or, you could consider not being a wanker all your life....
So there will be a strike where nothing changes. And you are accusing me of being difficult?
Profile. International news coverage. A very clear expression of public dissatisfaction and rebellion. The only thing governments are afraid of (barring neckshots) is mass unpopularity, because that threatens their power and income.
Or because people thought it too obvious to be worth answering.
How does a strike affect the employer. I mean, really.
Profile. International news coverage. A very clear expression of public dissatisfaction and rebellion. The only thing governments are afraid of (barring neckshots) is mass unpopularity, because that threatens their power and income.
Well, with a private company it hurts them in their pockets, AKA profits, but that doesn't apply to the government.
In fact the opposite - they get to save paying wages for the day, the public sector workers' are out of pocket by a day’s wages on top of being financially fucked left, right & centre anyway.
Most other people will probably not notice much and just shrug it off, unless they need public transport to get to work, in which case they’ll work from home, take a day off or try to struggle in anyway. A few may suffer.
A 24-hour public sector strike will achieve absolutely fuck all.
.....with a view to a 24 hour general strike.
Lol. Public transport isn't public sector.
And the govt has to pay out fuck loads to prepare for the strike; loses all its tax revenue for the day; and yet still has to, at some point, undertake all the work they would have undertaken on the strike day.
The media often bang on about how the march was all about the public sector. Bollocks was it. It was and will continue to be about everyone.
Did I say it was?
Most other people will probably not notice much and just shrug it off, unless they need public transport to get to work, in which case they’ll work from home, take a day off or try to struggle in anyway. A few may suffer.
Although, by proxy, much of it could be considered to be.
I just assumed you were including public transport in your plan to bring the government to its knees, but if you’re not – this idea will have even less impact.
And, should they manage it, would score a massive publicity boost. Might even be enough to see them re-elected.