this just isn't going to happen, dream on soft-labourites
wtf is 'sanguisuge'?sanguisuge ideology.
and a deal better at both politicking and PRthe Tories, who are unprincipled lying scum and proud of it.
fucking hell it's the doc Johnson episode of Blackadder all over again!San"gui*suge\, n. [L. sanguisuga; sanguis blood + sugere to suck.] (Zo["o]l.) A bloodsucker, or leech.
It's a perfectly cromulent word
fucking hell it's the doc Johnson episode of Blackadder all over again!
A good nickname for this clown might be Cock&Shite
San"gui*suge\, n. [L. sanguisuga; sanguis blood + sugere to suck.] (Zo["o]l.) A bloodsucker, or leech.
It's a perfectly cromulent word
here we go....i congratulate you on your contrafibularities.
that's one fuck of a misspelling then!Actually I just misspelled 'sausage'.
Vitriol is not attractive.
so will the yellow tories continue to prop up the tories if they lose their AV referendum?
It's the people's referendum, the electorate gets to decide what they want. I'm proud the party managed to win it, more than anyone else has done in the form of electroal reform.
that's one fuck of a misspelling then!
That doesn't really answer the question you quoted, does it? Will you continue to support your masters if this doesn't go through, given that it will mean you've gained nothing whatsoever from being in coalition?
Congrats on winning the holding of a referendum on AV which labour was going to do anyway. And congrats on losing it too. You've destroyed PR by hitching it to your parties interest.
It depends on how the coalition agreement is implemented, the party won a lot of compromise from the Conservatives in that agreement. AV is just one part of the agreement, and if we have the referundum then we have given people the choice.
If people choose they prefer FPTP that's their call, it wouldn't affect whether I thought giving them that choice was worthwhile or not.
You think they were going to hold it? They said they were going to before, and now it's not clear whether the party will support it or try and inflict a political defeat against the Lib Dems.
But you won't have actually gained anything will you? These "concessions" appear to all be things one could reasonably have expected to Tories to impliment anyway. Seems to me all you're really doing is making up the numbers in order to give the Tories a majority. How is this better, or even no worse, than a minority Tory government? I just don't see it myself. It doesn't matter what mental gymnastics you perform to make it so in your head, as in reality nobody sees you as being any different from the Tories. That's not just on here by the way, just about everyone I've spoken to about this agrees that the only difference between you and them is the colour.
Of course, the Lib Dems would NEVER back out of a pledge, would they?
You think they were going to hold it? They said they were going to before, and now it's not clear whether the party will support it or try and inflict a political defeat against the Lib Dems.
It's very hard for people to tell just how much the Lib Dems have won in concessions from the Conservatives. Largely because the party hasn't been making enough of a song and dance about it. The media focus is all around negative things and not the good things the party has helped achieve. I happen to think these things are worthwhile.
Most parties back out of pledges, the vast majority of Labour supporters spent 13 years justifying their support for the parties overall efforts in the face of broken pledges. That was a party commanding a massive majority in the commons too, not the smaller party in a coalition where it’s not possible to enact all of your promises even if you wanted too.