Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

When will the lib dem split happen?

When will the split happen?

  • Next week

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • By the end of 2010

    Votes: 3 4.6%
  • By the end of next year

    Votes: 34 52.3%
  • By the end of the term

    Votes: 8 12.3%
  • At some other point

    Votes: 5 7.7%
  • NEVER !!!!!!!! OUR DEAR MASTER LOVES US HE WILL NEVER BETRAY US

    Votes: 15 23.1%

  • Total voters
    65
One of the most ironic pics from my local paper was the recent one of a local councillor and my MP standing on the local divide beyond the poorer and (realtively) richer wards in the town claiming that tory council cuts were going to be disproproportionately fall on the poorer end and how unfair that was. I almost had to laugh at that blatant hypocrisy.

All Councils are making some form of cut, it's a legitimate criticism if some are targeting certain areas or groups. It's the same criticism that everyone on this board makes against many of the proposals.
 
All Councils are making some form of cut, it's a legitimate criticism if some are targeting certain areas or groups. It's the same criticism that everyone on this board makes against many of the proposals.

Are you really so thick as to miss his point? That its your own fucking councillors doing so?

And, of course, the liberals themselves had been doing precisely the same thing within councils whenever they won any. Now it is happening to them, they whine. No principles.
 
All Councils are making some form of cut, it's a legitimate criticism if some are targeting certain areas or groups. It's the same criticism that everyone on this board makes against many of the proposals.

So it's a legitimate critiscism if the poorest and neediest are atttached in savage spensing cuts?
But at the same time we "have" to do it?

Get your record straight Moon, please.
 
So it's a legitimate critiscism if the poorest and neediest are atttached in savage spensing cuts?
But at the same time we "have" to do it?

Get your record straight Moon, please.

The only straight bit of moon's story is his consistent promotion of the party.

Louis MacNeice
 
There is something Childlike about believing the government has magic pots of gold to carry on spending with and that nothing bad will ever come of this.

and there's something inherently dishonest about pretending that anyone says any such thing. Another classic Tory line you've picked up
 
Whould you be so kind as to point out to me where I said differently?
No problem - #319. It may seem like hair splitting, burt the distinction is vital and goes all the way back to De Montfort, in truth. I have one vote, for my local man. I am the only person who knows whether I am voting on local issues, for a particular party, in appreciation of the virtues of a particular candidate, because I hate A N other candidate, against a particular party, as a result of some spectacularly intricate tac-vote consideration, on a single national issue, or whatever combination of some/all of these, or whatever, full stop (in fact, it was Labour, solely because we have a fantastic Labour candidate). Either way, the ID of the Member for Leyton & Wanstead) is ALL I have my miniscule impact into. I am aware that the composition of the parliament is as a result of me x 30mil (or however many) and that the nature and therefore platform of the govt is a direct arithmentical consequence of that, but I do NOT vote for either parliament or govt; no-one does.
The distinction for me is in the inevitable conflation of local and national issues.
 
So it's a legitimate critiscism if the poorest and neediest are atttached in savage spensing cuts?
But at the same time we "have" to do it?

Get your record straight Moon, please.


My record is straight, cuts are needed but I don't think they should unfairly target the poorest and neediest. They should be above the board, those with the broadest shoulders should contribute the most.

Perhaps the Council in question has cut a lot of services in one poor ward and not in other richer wards, without knowing the detail it's impossible to know. It's entirely possible it's a valid criticism of how they are making the cuts.
 
No, the government doesn't have pots of gold.
They have gone to the bankers, to Trident, tax breaks for the mega rich and not even collecting due taxes to name but a few.

And a sponging doalites fecking wedding to pay for now as well. :mad:
 
and there's something inherently dishonest about pretending that anyone says any such thing. Another classic Tory line you've picked up

Fair point, it was a bit of a strawman, but I hardly said 'Daddy needs to hurt you' either. It's not that people think we need to reduce spending becuase it's good to hurt people, but rather that their economic understanding is such that they think this is the best course of action in the long run for people.
 
The government doesn't have pots of gold.
They have gone to the bankers, to Trident, tax breaks for the mega rich and not even collecting due taxes to name but a few.

And a sponging doalites fecking wedding to pay for now as well. :mad:

There is a significant burden on the industry that actually generates the wealth in this country. Rich people pay much more tax than poor people.
 
There is something Childlike about believing the government has magic pots of gold to carry on spending with and that nothing bad will ever come of this.

There is nothing childlike in recognising that this is a wealthy country quite able to 'pay it's way' (using the sort of phrase you seem to like); what is required are some tough political choices and actions (tough for a small minority that is).

What is childlike is sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting TINA, TINA!

Louis MacNeice
 
Fair point, it was a bit of a strawman, but I hardly said 'Daddy needs to hurt you' either. It's not that people think we need to reduce spending becuase it's good to hurt people, but rather that their economic understanding is such that they think this is the best course of action in the long run for people.

Pain is good for you. Work makes you free.

Funny how you said exactly the opposite before the election.
 
No problem - #319. It may seem like hair splitting, burt the distinction is vital and goes all the way back to De Montfort, in truth. I have one vote, for my local man. I am the only person who knows whether I am voting on local issues, for a particular party, in appreciation of the virtues of a particular candidate, because I hate A N other candidate, against a particular party, as a result of some spectacularly intricate tac-vote consideration, on a single national issue, or whatever combination of some/all of these, or whatever, full stop (in fact, it was Labour, solely because we have a fantastic Labour candidate). Either way, the ID of the Member for Leyton & Wanstead) is ALL I have my miniscule impact into. I am aware that the composition of the parliament is as a result of me x 30mil (or however many) and that the nature and therefore platform of the govt is a direct arithmentical consequence of that, but I do NOT vote for either parliament or govt; no-one does.
The distinction for me is in the inevitable conflation of local and national issues.

Hair-splitting?! Side-splitting sooner.
 
There is a significant burden on the industry that actually generates the wealth in this country.
Rich people pay much more tax than poor people.

Jesus, I have been patient Moon, but it is the yellow Tories! LOLZ, you couldn't make it up! :D
 
In the same way the Liberal Scum won the election?

That's factually incorrect. No-one won the election. That's why the parliament was hung. That's why this thread was started to discuss the politics of how long can the LibDems stay together. Those are the issues I have addressed, and while no-one needs to agree with me, there is no justification for saying that I've de-railed this thread.
 
There is a significant burden on the industry that actually generates the wealth in this country. Rich people pay much more tax than poor people.

Actually fuck loads of them, in all likelihood a majority, pay a smaller proportion of their income in tax than the average worker does. So you're wrong again.
 
@ Butcher's: No mate, still away.
Maybe the chance of a local pint around Easter time if I am not too tied up with that wedding! ;-)

(Sorry for thread de-rail folks, but local pints are important. :) )
 
Back
Top Bottom