belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
No it isn't.
When will the lib dem split happen?
- Thread starter frogwoman
- Start date
No it isn't.
Are you interested in discussion, or have you retarded to the level of a kindergarten infant?
"Have to"?
When times of economic crisis come in the capitalist system, explicity casued by greed, it is the poorest and neediest who "have" to pay for it?
I think the government has no real mandate.
I think the Lib Dems should have supported a caretaker government until new elections under a new electoral system could have been held this Autumn.
The current policies being forced through are only partially to do with the economic situation, they largely come from the tory anti working class hatred.
The LibDem leadership hardly made a pretence of trying to negotiate the tories onto a "one nation" Ted Heath kind of path.
Cameron's agenda was clear from the start and they went into it with their eyes open.
I voted Lib Dem for the right reasons, I won't be doing it again.
I've been voting Lib Dem, as one of your target voters, in a target constituency for 18 years.
Not any more.
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
Your comments do not go above that level, no. Lots of words, with no substance to them. hence no one will both discussing with you much, cos you say nothing.
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
but that's not what you said, and it isn't just pedantry from BA: it's central to all UK constitutional theory - the way we are governed, and for that matter represented
no, you are
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
It is NOT 'cuts in increases' AT ALL. It is CUTS full stop - a huge axe taken to essential frontline services, targetting the poor, needy and disadvantaged disproportionately. My borough is losing £50m spending FULL STOP. That means teachers being made redundant, youth facilities closing, voluntary services funding gone, care for the elderly destroyed - do you actually have ANY idea of the end impact of all that you're defending?
Whould you be so kind as to point out to me where I said differently?
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
The parliament doesn't even decide the govt. It approves it. This is kiddy stuff.
That is pure pedantry. The result of forming a government without support from Parliament is the fall of such a government. Quite decisive, I should think.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Oh god, the parliament does not decide what govt is put before it for approval. Do you really not know this?
Has the meaning of anything I've said been substantialy altered by some mistake with the use of definite or indefinate articles?
By the way I think that the mods, quite rightly, find messing around with user-names very childish.
What difference does it make if no-one would put a government before it for approval unless it knew it would be approved?
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
Of course it has. It is one of the reasons why you keep making basic mistakes and showing your ignorance.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Wow.
Why do you refuse to point out where this has happened?
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
Do you need to be told everything three times? It seems even kindergarten is beyond you.
I have to conclude that you can't show me. Could it be that all this de-rail has been the result of deliberate mis-reading of the meaning behind words?
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Look, you don't understand how the system works. That was evident from your post outlining how you think the system works. Some people told you this. That's it. Try and find out how it does.
Lucky I'm not a nooby who thinks himself unworthy and can be easily scared and chased away by bullies. I'll continue to make my points when I please and if ignored by you, will find that no great loss.
Louis MacNeice
Autumn Journalist
I'd have my hearing apparatus checked, if I was you.
I have not seen any proof. Can you, perhaps, point out where that is to be found?
Louis MacNeice
Autumn Journalist
One of the most ironic pics from my local paper was the recent one of a local councillor and my MP standing on the local divide beyond the poorer and (relatively) richer wards in the town claiming that tory council cuts were going to be disproproportionately fall on the poorer end and how unfair that was. I almost had to laugh at that blatant hypocrisy.
Attachments
Butchers has given you the pointers but there's a big old world wide web out there that will explains Janet and John consitutional theory for you, why don't you go and have a look instead of engaging in this rather embarassing blustering?
Similar threads
- Poll
