When will the lib dem split happen?

[Lock&Light]

not from you tho

Originally Posted by Lock&Light
I think there were very many reasons for the demise of Major's second administration.


You've just confirmed it.

 

[Pickman's model]

I think there were very many reasons for the demise of Major's second administration.

Seems there was some substance after all. Quelle surprise!

anything you post 'of substance' is composed of brown, squidy, odious material which not long previously has issued from a dog's rear.

 

[belboid]

I guessed at your 'reasons' (and picked the bleeding obvious). You added nothing. And still haven't.

 

[Lock&Light]

I guessed at your 'reasons' (and picked the bleeding obvious). You added nothing. And still haven't.

I thought that the "bastards in the Cabinet" did for Major as much as anything.

 

[belboid]

A bit of substance!

Rats fighting over the spoils, it was all over by then and they were fighting for what came after.

 

[Lock&Light]

A bit of substance!

Rats fighting over the spoils, it was all over by then and they were fighting for what came after.

Please yourself.

 

[Streathamite]

I thought that the "bastards in the Cabinet" did for Major as much as anything.

no, they didn't affect the polls in the slightest

 

[Pickman's model]

Please yourself.

frankie howerd did it better.

 

[Refused as fuck]

Has moon23 managed to come up with a reason why his face doesn't deserve to be married to the pavement? No, thought not.

 

[editor]

Has moon23 managed to come up with a reason why his face doesn't deserve to be married to the pavement? No, thought not.

Can you cut out all the violent nonsense and stick to the argument, please? Ta.

 

[moon23]

Interesting articule on the Coalition here, and some good new that at least people think parties having to work together is a better thing now.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...to-see-coalition-like-a-marriage-2140293.html

shortly before the May election, 49 per cent of people thought a hung parliament that would force parties to work together would be a "bad thing" and only 34 per cent a "good thing". Today 56 per cent regard it as a "good thing" and 38 per cent a "bad thing."

 

[frogwoman]

No, they think a hung parliament would have been a good thing, not the coalition.

 

[little_legs]

Interesting articule on the Coalition here, and some good new that at least people think parties having to work together is a better thing now.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...to-see-coalition-like-a-marriage-2140293.html

shortly before the May election, 49 per cent of people thought a hung parliament that would force parties to work together would be a "bad thing" and only 34 per cent a "good thing". Today 56 per cent regard it as a "good thing" and 38 per cent a "bad thing."

it's a private LibDem poll. the same article says that some poll has LibDems at 9% approval. there is nothing to be cheerful about.

 

[Refused as fuck]

Interesting articule on the Coalition here, and some good new that at least people think parties having to work together is a better thing now.

Yeah, all the privately educated twats working together to line their pockets with the skins of the poor. How fantastic for us.

 

[Lock&Light]

No, they think a hung parliament would have been a good thing, not the coalition.

Coalitions are what hung parliaments usually end up with.

 

[ericjarvis]

I suspect it's confusion between "hung" and "hanged".

 

[belboid]

Interesting articule on the Coalition here, and some good new that at least people think parties having to work together is a better thing now.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...to-see-coalition-like-a-marriage-2140293.html

shortly before the May election, 49 per cent of people thought a hung parliament that would force parties to work together would be a "bad thing" and only 34 per cent a "good thing". Today 56 per cent regard it as a "good thing" and 38 per cent a "bad thing."

Utterly meaningless. Some tories will have said yes that didnt before cos they think they should, some labourites will say they think its good cos they believe the whole 'liberals make the tories less bad' argument, or cos they know it is destroying two parties not just one. And, of course, both liberals will say they support it. Only an idiot would interpret it as anything positive.

 

[belboid]

Coalitions are what hung parliaments usually end up with.

taken a dumbo pill today? You are, surely normally aware of the difference between the meaning of 'a' and the meaning of 'the'??

 

[Refused as fuck]

Only an idiot would interpret it as anything positive.

You cannot rape the willing.

 

[Lock&Light]

taken a dumbo pill today? You are, surely normally aware of the difference between the meaning of 'a' and the meaning of 'the'??

Your comment makes no sense to me in relation to what I posted. Perhaps you'd like to explain?

 

[belboid]

hardly worth it, you're obviously thick as fuck and wouldnt actually answer anyway.

 

[Lock&Light]

I'm sorry to see you running scared.

 

[belboid]

Check your glasses. You have talked crap all day

 

[Lock&Light]

Check your glasses. You have talked crap all day

You don't seem to be able to prove your point. Only constantly repeat it.

 

[belboid]

oh the irony!

 

[Kid_Eternity]

Oh look l&l is back and yet again he's derailing a thread and pissing everyone off just like he used to...great.

 

[Lock&Light]

oh the irony!

As I said. Running scared.

 

[Santino]

No, you are.

 

[frogwoman]

ffs ... i actually thought this could be quite a good discussion ... well not good but perhaps better than the one we've got now.

 

[Lock&Light]

I'm still prepared to discuss the motivations of LibDem polititians. Is anyone else?