No.I just wondered what 'wrong' reasons people might have, in your opinion.
Are you asking me if the end justfies the reason?
Are you asking me if the end justfies the reason?
I didn't say it was.
There's a pre-existing narrative for everything, but these donations were just people responding in an unmediated, direct way to something they were upset about. It takes nothing away from from anyone's willingness to fight the cuts, work with/as claimants and all the rest.I don't agree - though i'm not saying it's the case here - I think there is a groupthink at work in Britain already. It's the result of superficial emotive manipulation that comes from X Factor sob stories, the Armed Forces Wives Choir, the death of Diana, and a general feeling, in people, of being insecure and left, by the powers at be, in the grip of the cold winds of economic fortune.
No.I just wondered what 'wrong' reasons people might have, in your opinion.
You did. You've been going on about whether people are donating for the 'right' reasons, something you call 'groupthink' and 'superficial emotive manipulation'. You are overthinking this - people donate because they want to, rather than emotive manipulation as you put it. Compassion is the best word for it.
I don't agree - though i'm not saying it's the case here - I think there is a groupthink at work in Britain already.
What I think has no bearing on how much was raised, why would it?Anyway, I don't care what Awesome Wells thinks. The good news is that over £800,000 has been raised now.
At least we can agree on this.What I think has no bearing on how much was raised, why would it?
What I think has no bearing on how much was raised, why would it?
You didn't read what I said, did you.
Nice logic.But you're going on about groupthink and emotive manipulation in relation to charitable or worthy causes, and even though you said you weren't talking about this particular case, it still falls within the same bracket. So you're talking crap.
And yet we live in a society where violence against claimants, including disabled sick and vulnerable people, is skyrocketing.It's worth remembering that people donated mountains of stuff for the people who were burnt out of their homes in the Tottenham riots in 2011.
I imagine a fair proportion of those people were on benefits, but nobody asked about this at the time. They just did the right thing.
Nice logic.And yet we live in a society where violence against claimants, including disabled sick and vulnerable people, is skyrocketing.
And yet we live in a society where violence against claimants, including disabled sick and vulnerable people, is skyrocketing.
Which would tend to suggest that "groupthink" is only partial, no?
You didn't read what I said, did you.
Not necessarily.
Look at the attitudes surrounding Help For Heroes, for example. The use of the word hero to describe soldiers. They are all heroes and we must support them. Part of the same groupthink, ably fed by the media who loves nothing more than to say 'our lads' or 'our boys' about anything from soldiers to sport players. 'Our'?
'lone nutter'?I think my point is that for every lone nutter who burns down a dogs home there are several hundred who turn up to help. This is a better state of affairs than the reverse.
It is possible that the rioters and those who donated material to the victims were all acting out of selfish motives. It is also possible that they were all genuinely trying to make the world a fairer place. Who knows? I am not a priest so I do not spend to much time judging the morality that lies behind people's actions.
'lone nutter'?
Why are so many people on here assuming the teenager actually did it? He could easily just be a local kid known for being weird who was in the area at the time, or had been involved with the dogs' home in some way. I know some people have expressed reservations but really everyone should be withholding judgment instead of assuming, bizarrely given the usual scepticism towards cops here, that the police have got the right person.
We'll find out more in the next couple of days as the normal period before the police have to charge or release should end on Sunday.
I think Awesome Wells has some point about the reaction and donations and I think it's to do with the polarisation between deserving/ undeserving.
As in, that family down the road who's husband died and who's mum drinks too much? Wouldn't give them a penny of my taxes, she should get a job etc, and, those lovely dogs, I'll sling them a fiver.
I'm not saying that this is a particular attitude in that area, just that I do think that as a nation we're leaning more towards the latter and not the former. Charity being based in an idea of people being deserving, and not socialism, or something.
Yeah, just curious as to how many people donating and sounding off about how evil the arsonist is leave their dogs at home all day while they go out to work or own breeds with genetic defects which cause them suffering. Doesn't sit right with me.Dogs are always more deserving than people, anyway.
Find out whether he's been charged or not. Guilt, it's usual practise to wait for a trial and verdict.
Yeah, just curious as to how many people donating and sounding off about how evil the arsonist is leave their dogs at home all day while they go out to work or own breeds with genetic defects which cause them suffering. Doesn't sit right with me.