Is it a requirement that discussions around the topic of what we should eat, extended here to what our pets should eat, should remain at the fluffy la la level? That mission statement from the Vegan Society contains a fair old bit of that, waffling about Pythagoras and Buddha. A more honest statement might read more like:
For thousands of years, humans have dreamed of a more compassionate relationship with animals. From Pythagoras and Buddha through to the founders of our society, people searched for ways to live that did not involve the exploitation of our fellow creatures. Sadly, at the time of the society's founding, this remained an impractical proposition. Pasty-faced and lethargic, the early veganists struggled to win converts to their cause. We were unable to escape our evolutionary legacy as omnivores, which had left us with a need to eat animal products. But in recent decades, thanks to advances in modern science, we can finally realise their dream of a healthy plant-based diet. We can fearlessly advocate our diet for others, and now even feed it to our dogs! Our companions for many thousands of years, dogs have evolved an ability to eat starchy food that their wolf ancestors lacked. Like us, they still require nutrients only found in animal products, but as with human food, these nutrients can now be produced in industrial laboratories and added to a plant-based diet to provide everything a dog needs. As we look towards a more sustainable future, modern industrial society is finding ways to solve the problems that it itself has caused. Along the way, it has finally made veganism a viable alternative.
But that's not very fluffy la la.