Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

US House passes Obama's key healthcare reform

Taking just the 1st point:

The bill is neither universal health care nor universal health insurance.

Per the CBO:

* Total uninsured in 2019 with no bill: 54 million
* Total uninsured in 2019 with Senate bill: 24 million (44%)
Sounds like 30mil more people will have health insurance.
 
So just to recap this bill will do nothing to help poor people in america. It will hurt the middle classes. The rich are against it, the insurance companies were against it........All very strange.......

Did you even read the fact sheet Butchers posted? You'd do well to read it and watch the lecture I linked to. The middle classes are fast becoming the poor and that lecture provides evidence for it. Her reasoning for giving the lecture is that most studies are of the poor, very few have been done on the middle class, her research speaks volumes.
 
Taking just the 1st point:


Sounds like 30mil more people will have health insurance.
Arghh!!! Are you reading the thread or even that article? They'll be subject to 'mandated insurance' - that is, those who don't have health insurance because they can't afford are to forced to buy private health insurance under the threat of fines. Of course, the fines are going to be lower than the cost of getting insurance, so people are going to pay the fine - and they'll be judged to have 'opted out'.
 
Do you dispute the figures? If they take the fine they will be uninsured, if as your link says there will be 30M less uninsured then they took the insurance, no?

Yeah, it'll shovel the poorest into segregated underfunded health ghettos.

What do you mean?
 
Taking just the 1st point:


Sounds like 30mil more people will have health insurance.

Are they going to have food and shelter? For some they're going to have to choose between buying the legally mandated insurance or paying for necessities.

And are they going to have access to health care, even with insurance? I'm nominally middle-class and my deductible went to $3,500 in plan and $10,500 out of plan this year. That essentially puts me into the "I have health insurance, but no health care" group. It would bankrupt me to actually get sick and this plan does nothing to change that for millions of people.
 
Most people can't afford health care now and over half of all bankruptcies are because of health care bills. How is a new bill that gives the choice of either paying for health care or paying a fine for health care? At least in the old system you could opt out and be left alone. The 30 million figure is just a random figure. This is going to seriously fuck people over, the fact that the bill is virtually identical to the health care lobbyists proposals should tell you all you need to know.
 
Do you dispute the figures? If they take the fine they will be uninsured, if as your link says there will be 30M less uninsured then they took the insurance, no?
I dispute that forcing people who can't afford health insurance to buy health insurance (with no block on the companies raising premiums or any other profit making schemes they can come up with) counts as extending insurance. Nor do i count the putting of privatised profit at the centre of health allocation for the next 100 years at least as a step forward towards a better system.


What do you mean?

I mean the very poorest, those who were fined for opting out of the private health insurance the state tried to force them to buy will be shoveled into an underfunded medicaid system, entitled to only minor and extremely short-term or emergency care. Health ghettos replicating or mirroring real ghettos.
 
Point number 3. Help buying insurance seemed to say that there will be help buying the insurance.
 
Nor do i count the putting of privatised profit at the centre of health allocation for the next 100 years at least as a step forward towards a better system.
I'd rather not have private insurance at the center either, but there simply aren't the votes in the congress to change that now or in the foreseeable future.
....an underfunded medicaid system, entitled to only minor and extremely short-term or emergency care.....
It is underfunded but does provide much more than that.
The health care help available through this program must include service such as:

Inpatient and outpatient hospital services
Payment of physician services
Surgical and medical dental services
Nursing facility (NF) services for individuals aged 21 or older
Home health care for persons that are eligible for nursing facility services
Family planning services and supplies
Nurse / midwife services
Laboratory services and X-rays
Pediatric and those services provided by a family nurse practitioner
Federally-qualified health center services and ambulatory services that are otherwise covered under a state plan
Rural health clinic services and other ambulatory services that are otherwise covered under a state plan
http://www.money-zine.com/Financial-Planning/Buying-Insurance/Medicaid-Benefits/
 
Do you dispute the figures? If they take the fine they will be uninsured, if as your link says there will be 30M less uninsured then they took the insurance, no?

Just having health insurance in the US doesn't mean you can afford healthcare. From what I can tell nearly every insurance scheme (particularly those affordable to the poorest) will have a myriad of copayments and deductibles for many treatments. This is why something like three quarters of people who have gone bankrupt due to medical bills have health insurance already. And from the factsheet.

Many Massachusetts residents forgo health care because they can’t afford it.

A 2009 study by the state of Massachusetts found that:

* 21% of residents forgo medical treatment because they can’t afford it, including 12% of children
* 18% have health insurance but can’t afford to use it
 
One point: the fee for not buying insurance is not as scary as it sounds, assuming that it will be comparable with what we already have here in Mass. The way it works is, if you seriously don't make enough to pay the fee, then you most likely qualify for the state funded program for free or reduced cost care. Part of the point is that when people don't apply for such programs, and end up in the ER, especially for something that could have been preventable, those hospital bills don't just disappear. They are paid for by a govt fund for unpaid hospital bills. The point is to save $ (and lives) by "forcing" people to get preventative care, even if it is paid in part or full by the govt, it will save money for everyone in the end to not have the higher emergency room costs.
And no, the system here (in mass.) Is far from perfect. I know this very well,as I personally have been uninsured for the most part of the last 15(!) yrs of my life. I haven't been able to qualify for MassHealth due to a technicality.
None of this is ideal. We hate that the insurance co's still make out on this deal. But its a small step. Unfortunately, that seems to be the only way things get done here (in the U.S.)
 
bbc

its a start....
:)

health insurance will be extended to nearly all Americans, new taxes will be imposed on the wealthy, and restrictive insurance practices such as refusing to cover people with pre-existing medical conditions will be outlawed.

Amen. When you read those points, one wonders what the resistance was, aside from the resistance of the wealthy to a tax increase.

It's nice to see the wealthiest country on earth do something like this for its citizens.
 
The Repubs will run on repealing it.

.

What needs to happen, is for Obama to win a second term. If the health care plan is allowed to operate for seven years, it will be a start in showing americans that communism doesn't inevitably follow, and that the reforms have been a force for good in the lives of many people.

If that's allowed to happen, the Repubs won't be able to win on a platform of rolling it back, seven years from now.
 
Amen. When you read those points, one wonders what the resistance was, aside from the resistance of the wealthy to a tax increase.

It's nice to see the wealthiest country on earth do something like this for its citizens.

I think the health reform in the US was well overdue but there are a lot of people against it, whether this resistance is based on fact or not.

One of the reasons for being against it is the fear of their health system becoming like the system in Canada because "we often see Canadians coming over the border to get treatment that is not available or not available in a reasonable time in Canada" (I'm in Oregon at the moment on a job)

That quote was from a conversation I had a couple of days ago with someone who is far from being wealthy and is also not a republican.

Any comments?
 
This basically boils down to everyone being forced to buy health care from companies that can charge exactly what they want.

Auto insurance is mandatory, but no one seems to think that that is a bad thing. In Canada, we pay health insurance premiums - here in B.C., it's to an entity called MSP - Medical Services Plan. Its an entity set up by the govt to deal with medical costing, payments etc. It's mandatory to be a member and to pay the premiums.
 
Too bad no one ever takes the time to learn the truth of how the system operates here.

I've no idea how the system works up there, but the quote was from someone who IMO shouldn't be against health care reform but is and that was one of the reasons she gave based (according to her) on her experience of meeting and talking with Canadians in the US.

I think the propaganda put out by the GOP is exactly that, propaganda (mainly because, despite its faults the NHS isn't that bad) but this is a person speaking from experience.
 
It's a very small step, and the criticisms are justified, but it's silly to pretend there's nothing at all positive in it. About half of those who will get coverage where they had none will qualify for free care under Medicaid, and most of the rest will qualify for subsidised insurance. Medicaid reimbursement is increasing 10% to encourage doctors to take on Medicaid patients. Baby steps, for sure, and miles away from what the majority of the public and the majority of employers want, but it's hard to comprehend quite how fucked up the US healthcare system is. The vested interests won't give up without a fight.

From what I've heard, shares in drug companies have gone up with the news but the market is more mixed on its verdicts with the insurance companies; some are expected to do well out of this, others will lose out. Don't know how that will pan out - I've not seen much about how the various localised monopolies will be affected and how much additional competition will be introduced.
 
The point is to save $ (and lives) by "forcing" people to get preventative care, even if it is paid in part or full by the govt, it will save money for everyone in the end to not have the higher emergency room costs.

Not going to happen.

People are still going to eat at McDonalds, Burger King, Arby's, Captain D's, Wendy's, Church's Chicken, Pizza Hut, Papa Johns, SteaknShake, Cook Out, Taco Bell, chinese and drink all the Pepsi, Coke etc...they can hold

or buy the same Hot Pocket crap frozen at the store and microwave it at home

^ their whole lives

still going to smoke

and still going to end up at the hospital all the same.
 
I think the health reform in the US was well overdue but there are a lot of people against it, whether this resistance is based on fact or not.

One of the reasons for being against it is the fear of their health system becoming like the system in Canada because "we often see Canadians coming over the border to get treatment that is not available or not available in a reasonable time in Canada" (I'm in Oregon at the moment on a job)

That quote was from a conversation I had a couple of days ago with someone who is far from being wealthy and is also not a republican.

Any comments?

To save money, millions of uninsured and underinsured U.S. consumers purchase drugs from online pharmacies in Canada, India, the UK and other countries and receive their purchases by mail. Especially for uninsured Americans taking prescription drugs for chronic health conditions, a major attraction of online pharmacies abroad is that nearly every country, except the U.S., controls its drug prices. Shoppers can easily obtain 50 to 80 percent or more savings at foreign pharmacies, in comparison to US prices.[3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_pharmacy#U.S._consumers


In the border states, thousands of people cross the line on trips especially to fill their prescriptions and avoid the prohibitive pricing they'd face in the US.
 
One point: the fee for not buying insurance is not as scary as it sounds, assuming that it will be comparable with what we already have here in Mass. The way it works is, if you seriously don't make enough to pay the fee, then you most likely qualify for the state funded program for free or reduced cost care. Part of the point is that when people don't apply for such programs, and end up in the ER, especially for something that could have been preventable, those hospital bills don't just disappear. They are paid for by a govt fund for unpaid hospital bills. The point is to save $ (and lives) by "forcing" people to get preventative care, even if it is paid in part or full by the govt, it will save money for everyone in the end to not have the higher emergency room costs.
And no, the system here (in mass.) Is far from perfect. I know this very well,as I personally have been uninsured for the most part of the last 15(!) yrs of my life. I haven't been able to qualify for MassHealth due to a technicality.
None of this is ideal. We hate that the insurance co's still make out on this deal. But its a small step. Unfortunately, that seems to be the only way things get done here (in the U.S.)

It's my understanding that there's a certain cut off point that enables you to qualify for Medicaid. The people that fall just outside of that, i.e already struggling lower middle class families, won't be able to qualify but will be fined if they don't buy health insurance. I also understand that medicaid is being cut, dunno how true that is though.

Auto insurance is mandatory, but no one seems to think that that is a bad thing. In Canada, we pay health insurance premiums - here in B.C., it's to an entity called MSP - Medical Services Plan. Its an entity set up by the govt to deal with medical costing, payments etc. It's mandatory to be a member and to pay the premiums.

That's a pretty poor argument. You choose to drive a car and cars cause a lot of accidents so it absolutely should be mandatory, if you can't afford to drive you don't drive. Health, on the other hand, is an entirely different kettle of fish. You don't really have a choice on whether you get ill or not, sure you can take steps to prevent it but it's all pot luck in the end.

I think if the fines weren't in the bill and more pressure on the insurance companies not to charge what they like, i'd be more inclined to support it. I said it earlier, the fact that the bill is virtually identical to the insurance lobbyists proposals should tell you who really wins out of this.
 
That's a pretty poor argument. You choose to drive a car and cars cause a lot of accidents so it absolutely should be mandatory, if you can't afford to drive you don't drive. Health, on the other hand, is an entirely different kettle of fish. You don't really have a choice on whether you get ill or not, sure you can take steps to prevent it but it's all pot luck in the end..

Cars are pretty universal here, so the similarity may be greater here. And you don't really have a choice in whether you're in a car accident or not.
 
Cars are pretty universal here, so the similarity may be greater here. And you don't really have a choice in whether you're in a car accident or not.

Of course not but the point is you choose to drive the car that leads to that accident. You don't tend to choose to get, say, dementia. That's the difference.

Edit: Just thank our lucky stars we live in a country with universal health care. How does it work in Canada? Do you have a similar thing to our national insurance that funds it?
 
There's no reason car insurance has to be private. Some Australian states insure every driver 3rd party as part of the licence fee. It's not sensible to allow anything that we all, or most of us, have to have into a profit-making industry. That's why US healthcare is so peculiarly fucked.
 
Back
Top Bottom