Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

US election 2020 thread

What makes you say that? Trump is currently 500k ahead but there are still over 3m votes left to count, primarily from Democratic strongholds and early voters (strongly Democratic). Washington Post have got it as leaning towards Biden at the moment.
Well, we'll see. I'm not really in statistical mode, more an emotional one: that seems like a big optimistic turnaround to trudge through. So I'm hitching my emotional wellbeing to Vegas. What could possibly go wrong...
 
That's miles behind as the Guardian have been all day.

Use Sky.

Biden 2, 431, 315
Trump 2, 981, 316
Other 73, 160
% 77%
Total 5, 485, 791
Remaining 1, 638, 613
Fair enough - didn't realise the Guardian were that far behind! I still see the Democrats winning PA though.
 
CNN reporting Trump's lead has dropped by 80k in the last hour, from around 630k to 550k, with almost a million votes to still count, so anything is possible.
Wherever this ends up, there's going to be some fascinating and/or depressing psephology to read after this. Particularly on the make up of the postal vs in person.
 
So, does anyone know what the actual case is that will be taken to the Supreme Court? I'm assuming they'll have to make a passing attempt to dress up "we don't want their votes to count"?

<edit: ah, ok, just caught this

So... no? :D >
Sky news guest (US politics prof) suggested it was at the state constitutional level that assumptions about previous date-stamped mail-in votes being counted had not technically been ratified at state level..or some such.
 
Whatever the outcome it does show how bad the polls can be. It looked like Biden had a clear margin.

Anyway , it'll go on for days but I hope that after the split 2000 election it can be the Democrats this time who are lucky.
 
Whatever the outcome it does show how bad the polls can be. It looked like Biden had a clear margin.

Anyway , it'll go on for days but I hope that after the split 2000 election it can be the Democrats this time who are lucky.
What's the overall popular vote looking like (too lazy to look + must work)?
 
Sky news guest (US politics prof) suggested it was at the state constitutional level that assumptions about previous date-stamped mail-in votes being counted had not technically been ratified at state level..or some such.
Even though I knew it would be something petty and trumped up*, but it's still already annoying.



*leave it, it's a valid phrase and we have to reclaim it :mad:
 
Back
Top Bottom