Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Urban v's the Commentariat

She immediately bought into it as hers, as one that she was part of and that had accidentally stepped out of - and then spent some time trying to fit into these dicks world. Fuck her.

Each word, each step, each action (as if) driving that wedge further. Good.

My point wasn't that Penny's just great, but that as so often she is representative of a type. Usually, she's this place's favourite stand in for liberal-left media self-promoters as a whole, but on this occasion she's acting so as to fit in with a more "grassroots" variant of twitter intersectionalism. (Which at another remove is part of maintaining her personal brand amongst the liberal-leftish media sorts)
 
My point wasn't that Penny's just great, but that as so often she is representative of a type. Usually, she's this place's favourite stand in for liberal-left media self-promoters as a whole, but on this occasion she's acting so as to fit in with a more "grassroots" variant of twitter intersectionalism. (Which at another remove is part of maintaining her personal brand amongst the liberal-leftish media sorts)
I know that you don't think that she's great - really. My point was that she had stepped out of and quickly tried to jump back into this dual market - this dual authenticity. Hence her scrabbling around on her knees in the one she is less powerful in, the one where anyone can her to fuck. Going through this idiocy to emerge as an authentic ally is probably easier then the real world being left wing market.
 
Last edited:
I know that you don't think that she's great - really. My point was that she had stepped out of and quickly tried to jump back into this dual market - this dual authenticity. Hence her scrabbling around on her knees in the one she is less powerful in, the one where anyone can all her to fuck. Going through this idiocy to emerge as an authentic ally is probably easier then the real world being left wing market.

Can't disagree with any of that.
 
A rare moment of commentariat-positive urbanism: Dominic Fox put up a really good series of tweets on aspects of the "sex work" debate today. Of course,he got very little response.

Twitter.com/domfox
 


The context of that one is important though, because he goes on to say that he's in favour, ideally, of people being equally free to say that they don't want to go to work. His point in this part of his tweet series was that in every other circumstance we recognise sex as distinct because of intimacy and issues of bodily autonomy - eg anyone saying that sexual trauma is no different to any other form of physical trauma would be immediately recognised as being "obtuse".

His concentration on what might sarcastically be called the agency and choices of punters is also a welcome corrective. Plus his comparison between the effects of economic coercion on "consent" with situations in which married women have "consented" under forms of coercion was very sharp.

I'm not at all surprised that he only got one biter.
 
christopher reiss who done that hilarious article about a stone being thrown at a google van 'a shot that rang out across the world'

if that was he.
 
It was an assumption based on his appearance and accent. I wouldn't usually bother to mention ethnicity like that.
How, for that matter, do you know he was cis instead of a very happy post op (or very convincing transitioning) trans?
 
Fuck they :mad:
"Them". Confusing as it may be for some people, the nonsexist "they" always takes the plural in the appropriate case, never the singular. Even when "they" refers to one person.

If you prefer it, "hir" has also been attempted as a nonsexist pronoun. It's inelegant and sometimes still sounds sexist so is less widely used than "they/them/their".
 
"Them". Confusing as it may be for some people, the nonsexist "they" always takes the plural in the appropriate case, never the singular. Even when "they" refers to one person.

If you prefer it, "hir" has also been attempted as a nonsexist pronoun. It's inelegant and sometimes still sounds sexist so is less widely used than "they/them/their".
You're not from round here are you?
 
One of the skiffy books I read recently has 'yt' as the indicative pronoun self chosen by third gendered people.

bit too close to 'it' imo but in the context of the tale these are deliberate and chosen by the third gendered. iyswim
 
It's a countercultural thing, prevalent among people I knew and socialised with long before the Commentariat was even a blob of ink on an overused biro.
Cool, no probs - i just don't understand what you said though - not in a spikey way, i just find this stuff hard to follow.
 
In Spain some activists have taken to using @ or x in words which would otherwise denote gender, so todos/todas becomes todxs or tod@s. A bit silly I think.
 
Back
Top Bottom