Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-25

One of the many things that has puzzled me about this conflict is why Russia have apparently relied so little on airpower given that the Ukrainians seem to be wholly reliant on artillery.If the Ukrainians are contemplating lobbing cluster munitions towards Russian infantry one might have thought that the Russians would respond with cluster bombs.Admittedly I have seen suggestions this is already happening?
 
One of the many things that has puzzled me about this conflict is why Russia have apparently relied so little on airpower given that the Ukrainians seem to be wholly reliant on artillery.If the Ukrainians are contemplating lobbing cluster munitions towards Russian infantry one might have thought that the Russians would respond with cluster bombs.Admittedly I have seen suggestions this is already happening?
The one very capable bit of the Russian Armed Forces is their air defence. It's capable, and there's a lot of it. And they left quite a lot of it behind in Ukraine when the Soviet Union fell apart. The Russian Air Force has a healthy regard for the capability of their own systems and don't want to get anywhere near them unless they have to. Unlike with tanks, they don't have thousands upon thousands of aircraft sitting about ready to be mobilised, so every loss there hurts.

As for the cluster stuff, the Ukrainians are mostly wanting artillery shells. The bombs they are getting are being taken apart to use all the little bomblets inside for drones because - as you've rightly questioned - they don't have any fucking way to get bombs over the Russians due to the number of surface to air missiles littered about. On the Russian side, they've dropped cluster bombs since Day One, which is why this isn't really regarded as an escalation in any way, but they're limited as to how close they can get because of the above.
 
Having expended 5x the amount of space as the OP over a post that contained two acronyms (one of which was for something that... well that's it name, it doesn't have a different way of putting it), maybe we could move that discussion to a different thread. :)

#CancelTheThreadPolice
 
No offence to your mate, but I'd have thought an ex-RM (unless he has some specialist expertise in that area like he was a JTAC/FAC or was some ranking officer) is going to know next to fuck all about deployment of air power in Ukraine.


It is however noticeable that neither side really has air superiority at this point. Consider the usual state of affairs where the US and it’s allies are operating from a position of total air supremacy while blowing up farmers.

That’s not happening here, the airforces are locked to the front lines with Russia and Russia is lobbing missiles from miles away afraid to lose its assets
 
Have you ever imagined what it would be like to meet up for a drink with Urban's military hardware and acronym enthusiasts?
Having done it on more than one occasion, I can only remark on how friendly, interesting, and pleasant the encounters have been. FWIW, I can't recall any of the people there (which has included posters on this very thread) displaying any sign of being "military hardware and acronym enthusiasts". I think you're seeing something that isn't actually there.
 
One of the many things that has puzzled me about this conflict is why Russia have apparently relied so little on airpower given that the Ukrainians seem to be wholly reliant on artillery.If the Ukrainians are contemplating lobbing cluster munitions towards Russian infantry one might have thought that the Russians would respond with cluster bombs.Admittedly I have seen suggestions this is already happening?
In a nutshell, it's because Ukraine has pretty good air defence. Russia knew it had some, and the initial assault was intended to - and very nearly did - completely cripple Ukraine's capacity in that regard. But they were a) better than Russia expected, and b) well dispersed and mobile. And, after the initial invasion, Ukraine suddenly found itself with a LOT of MANPADs (that's "man-portable air defence", for those of you at the back), which are pretty useful as frontline air defence.
 
I'd rank it just behind (for the satire, not as a sitcom obvs)...
And I went up there, I said, "Shrink, I want to kill. I mean, I wanna, I
Wanna kill. Kill. I wanna, I wanna see, I wanna see blood and gore and
Guts and veins in my teeth. Eat dead burnt bodies. I mean kill, Kill,
KILL, KILL." And I started jumpin up and down yelling, "KILL, KILL, " and
He started jumpin up and down with me and we was both jumping up and down
Yelling, "KILL, KILL." And the sargent came over, pinned a medal on me,
Sent me down the hall, said, "You're our boy."
But then I think the entire purpose of American Thanksgiving is play Alice's Restaurant 5 times over.
 
This article from the New York Times doesn't reveal anything new but is a concise 'this is where we are at' imo

After Suffering Heavy Losses, Ukrainians Paused to Rethink Strategy

Early in the counteroffensive, Ukraine lost as much as 20 percent of its weapons and armor. The rate dropped as the campaign slowed and commanders shifted tactics.

 
Without air cover, their NATO friends can't offer much strategy help because NATO's is entirely based on air power. So they're going at it the old fashioned Soviet way, and it's a total slog. But it means they've got a lot of donated kit they really don't know how to use. Like the Fench light tanks they got. Tried to use them as supporting an armoured column instead of as a scout force and they got (rightly) shredded to bits. Then they bitched about scout tanks not being able to take a hit. (Hint: they're not supposed to) There's a real clash of heads between their generals and their Allies' ones. Both accusing the other of not knowing what to do under the circumstances.
 
Back
Top Bottom