Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

UK Votes to Leave EU

Larry Elliot in the Guardian going for the 'rejection of globalisation' angle.

Brexit is a rejection of globalisation
I was going to say that next we can unilaterally reject the weather, or gravity. But no, he has it covered :)

There are those who argue that globalisation is now like the weather, something we can moan about but not alter. This is a false comparison. The global market economy was created by a set of political decisions in the past and it can be shaped by political decisions taken in the future.
Thanks, Larry Elliot! Decisions will keep the wolf from the door.
 
beneficial to all parties is... questionable. That's why the blackmail didn't work.

I don't get the blackmail bit. Britain is a pretty successful country and a lot of people believe that success is at least in part down to EU membership. Would Nissan be providing jobs in Sunderland if we were not in the EU is one question and we also need to ask if they will continue to do so if we don't agree to EU terms to gain access to the single market. Pointing out things like this is not blackmail.
 
I was going to say that next we can unilaterally reject the weather, or gravity. But no, he has it covered
I would suggest it is more like we have rolled up to the sports pitch determined to play football, only to find everyone else on the field is playing rugby.
 
I don't get the blackmail bit. Britain is a pretty successful country and a lot of people believe that success is at least in part down to EU membership. Would Nissan be providing jobs in Sunderland if we were not in the EU is one question and we also need to ask if they will continue to do so if we don't agree to EU terms to gain access to the single market. Pointing out things like this is not blackmail.
The idea that most of the 'experts' who were pointing out things like that were neutral observers, just saying it like it is is pretty transparent. They were for the most part actors, with a stake and a say in what happens next.

What's happening now isn't some sort of natural reaction, the market isn't a force of nature. What's happening now is a punishment. It's happening because they are doing what they said they would do if we didn't do what they said. The definition of blackmail.
 
The idea that most of the 'experts' who were pointing out things like that were neutral observers, just saying it like it is is pretty transparent. They were for the most part actors, with a stake and a say in what happens next.

What's happening now isn't some sort of natural reaction, the market isn't a force of nature. What's happening now is a punishment. It's happening because they are doing what they said they would do if we didn't do what they said. The definition of blackmail.

I wasn't quoting any experts. My gut feeling was remain but I looked things up for myself. Britain makes a big deal out of car manufacturers choosing to operate here. If you look up facts and figures you discover that over half of the cars we make are exported to the EU. We have had £3.5 billion of EU funding for R&D for the motor industry from the EU.

I also looked at how funding was allocated and it all seemed pretty sensible.

Even the leave campaign admitted that there would initially be some negative effects on the economy. The markets may not be a force of nature but neither are they driven by hard facts, they react to events and perceived impacts of those events. If this was how I made my money I would be looking to protect myself from the event that is brexit by backing away from UK investment, whether I was pro in or pro out. In any case I believe the markets are too large and complex to be manipulated in this way as it would need the collision of a lot of people, who would have to be prepared to lose a lot of money.

I can see how certain parts of the media might be accused of blackmail but that was both sides of the so called debate.
 
I'm finding it difficult to keep track of.. well, anything really, so sorry if this has already been posted, but I think this is a brilliant article by Lisa McKenzie

Today is a depressing day. It doesn’t have to be, but it is. And of course the blame game has started: the middle-class Remainers are pointing fingers at the working-class Leavers. This is just the latest in the narratives that they have been rehearsing over the past few months. First it was “the working class won’t be interested and they won’t vote”; next it was “the working class will do what the Labour Party tells them to”; then we progressed to “the Labour Party is not doing enough to tell ‘their’ voters to vote Remain”.

But as the EU referendum vote loomed closer, the rhetoric became much darker: “the working class are racist, and stupid, and backwards, which is why they are voting Leave”. In the final few days before the referendum, and today in its aftermath, the explanation for Brexit offered up by politicians and the media is that the working class are “dupes”, they have been “conned”, and they are turkeys voting for Christmas.

I don’t agree with this analysis.

EU referendum: many don’t care what happens next, they just wanted change
 
I wasn't quoting any experts. My gut feeling was remain but I looked things up for myself. Britain makes a big deal out of car manufacturers choosing to operate here. If you look up facts and figures you discover that over half of the cars we make are exported to the EU. We have had £3.5 billion of EU funding for R&D for the motor industry from the EU.
Car manufacturing is thoroughly global, but take pretty much any competitive mass produced car, in particular ones from companies HQ'd outside the EU - Hyundai/Kia etc. They're almost all assembled somewhere in the EU, presumably because of tariffs. Then conversely, Euro manufacturers struggle to break into for example the Chinese and even American markets - see e.g. VW in the US. If the UK doesn't arrange free trade, then why wouldn't all of those relocate immediately? That's not blackmail at any coherent level beyond the 'blackmail of global capital', that's pragmatism.

Within the EU, why some chose to set up in Britain was actually closer to bribery, but that ceases to be the dominant factor if we dramatically change our relationship with the bloc.
 
It's not worth anything. I took part in that survey. We were presented with a list of 3 pre-determined options and had to rank them.

Interesting to hear from someone who actually took park.

They gave three stereotypical options from each side and then pretend that the results mean something. So much for fucking "experts"
 
There's some musing here about whether Britain will ever trigger article 50 and how the EU will play it if we don't. I think it's wrong and that somebody is going to have to trigger the fucking thing, whether it be Cameron or Johnson. However it's another indication of how mad things have got since Thursday - along with the tories split and labour in meltdown.

Will article 50 ever be triggered?
 
Back
Top Bottom