andysays
Love and solidarity
On the referendum, let the people decide has been a method of subduing division within his party for a decade,successive leaderships painted themselves into a corner not least to stop UKIp corroding their membership. However, there was and is talk of a further treaty in which UK would be offered Associate membership...if that happens there is a constitutional imperative for a referendum, would have been pressure for other EUropean states to lance anti EU sentiment ahead of that referendum as a No would road block the treaty across the whole continent (sort of, Ireland and France secured very little change to previous treaties before being told to vote again)- Would if happened also be interesting, as we would by then clearly know how much of Cameron's "reforms" had been implemented.
On Cameron being finished, regardless of the result, I agree. Gone on 22nd July. They will want to get to the parliamentary recess before launching what could be a difficult leadership battle.
I accept that those are reasons why he felt having a referendum was a good idea/would get him and his party out of the difficulty of having to reach agreement themselves, but I still say that the decision to have a referendum at the time and in the way we're having it was basically his to make or not make.
To suggest, as killer b appears to be doing, that he didn't have a choice, seems to me to be totally incorrect, but also to Cameron off the hook for making a decision which looks (even if the vote still ends up being to remain) to have been a disaster from his point of view.