and when you handed it back to the child who gave it you, i hope you said they needed a more sophisticated analysis but it was a good effort
Energy producers profits re likely to be £170 Billion over the next 2 years according to the Treasury. Interesting data to grapple with for those carping about a windfall tax on the bastards:
Energy producers profits re likely to be £170 Billion over the next 2 years according to the Treasury. Interesting data to grapple with for those carping about a windfall tax on the bastards:
Backing this up is a recently published paper by the IMF which I saw referred to by Michael Roberts, where the authors looked for evidence of wage-price spirals historically and essentially found nothing much.Critisticuffs doing their thing:
Critisticuffs — There is no Wage-Price Spiral
critisticuffs.org
Whether this will travel far enough down the chain of entrail readers to reach the luminaries of the Bank of England for example remains to be seen, doubt it will shake their certainty that wages must be suppressed one way or the other anyway.IMF said:Wage-price spirals, at least defined as a sustained acceleration of prices and wages, are hard to find in the recent historical record. Of the 79 episodes identified with accelerating prices and wages going back to the 1960s, only a minority of them saw further acceleration after eight quarters. Moreover, sustained wage-price acceleration is even harder to find when looking at episodes similar to today, where real wages have significantly fallen. In those cases, nominal wages tended to catch-up to inflation to partially recover real wage losses, and growth rates tended to stabilize at a higher level than before the initial acceleration happened. Wage growth rates were eventually consistent with inflation and labor market tightness observed. This mechanism did not appear to lead to persistent acceleration dynamics that can be characterized as a wage-price spiral.
Critisticuffs doing their thing:
Critisticuffs — There is no Wage-Price Spiral
critisticuffs.org
a thought...in the Death of the Left podcast smokey posted the authors of that book complain about the supposed lack of focus by "the left" on economics...leaving them aside or the accuracy of that complaint, there is an issue regarding economics which is that it is very complicated and beyond most people.Thanks for the heads up hitmouse, I've not seen this.
Lower than I thought it'd be.
There’s a reason why working class kids are never taught about how the economy they will have to engage with works.a thought...in the Death of the Left podcast smokey posted the authors of that book complain about the supposed lack of focus by "the left" on economics...leaving them aside or the accuracy of that complaint, there is an issue regarding economics which is that it is very complicated and beyond most people.
that cristicuffs thing is written clearly and simply, they've really tried to make it accesible - but its still too much for me to really understand with any certainty, happy though i am to go along with their conclusions. I'm probably a bit above average in terms of trying to understand stuff like this, in that i've tried repeatedly, i've read a few economics books over the years, i read articles on economics etc.
with Marx for example there is no day in my life i am ever going to read Capital. It will never happen - i've had a look and its too hard. I understand the basic principles, and the core necessity to redistribute is obvious and needs no explanation.
my point is that discussing economics with normal (noneconomist) people is really hard and in most cases is two people who both dont really know what they are talking about giving their impressions. the false household budget analogies are a good example of that. i know they are false but i couldnt tell you more about "borrowing" in any meaningful way.
this is a problem with 'the left' making bigger economic arguments - they need to be simplistic (tax justice, redistribution, tobin tax, increase public spending etc), but when they get refuted with other simplicities no magic money tree, cupboard is bare, live within means etc,) those criticisms can sound reasonable to many. its a hard dynamic to break through
its a good pointThere’s a reason why working class kids are never taught about how the economy they will have to engage with works.
It makes total sense. Economics isn't what you think it is. It's not the study of economic activity. It's the production of the idea that there is a thing called the economy and that it can be studied and thus policies and behaviours supportive of it should be adopted and encouraged. Even saying economic activity takes on these basic assumptions.
Inflation 10.1%
Food inflation 19% (highest rate for over 50 years)
Certain basic food stuffs (milk, cheese, eggs) 30%
As expected no word from labour on any of it. But where is the trade union/left mass campaign demanding real terms wage rises, price controls on essential items and increased tax on increased profits. Let alone a cogent set of arguments on the need for energy supply and food sourcing restructuring.
Don’t worry everyone, the banks are still making money
HSBC profit more than doubles as interest rates rise
The Bank of England, which has raised rates 13 times in a row, is expected to hike them again on Thursday.www.bbc.co.uk
Furrowed brows at the Bank of England, those Pret workers must be raking it inTalking of blatant profiteering...
Pret ramps up prices as gross profits climb 83%
The price of an egg mayo sandwich is up 72% since 2020, compared to CPI inflation of 20% over the same periodwww.standard.co.uk
The UK should set up a public-private partnership to oversee a financial and professional services growth strategy and help secure a potential £225bn boost to the economy, according to the local authority for London’s financial district.
The City of London Corporation on Thursday published a report containing proposals for a government and financial and professional services council to support the local authority’s proposals to expand the sectors.
Other objectives in the report highlighted the need to increase investment, become a digital first economy, focus on sustainable finance and boost exports.
Chris Hayward, policy chair at the City of London Corporation, told the Financial Times that the public private partnership would ensure delivery of the growth strategy.
“The public private partnership . . . will make sure that the strategy is followed through,” he said.
“When I go around the world and look at competitor countries, particularly in Asia, they all have strategies . . . We don’t have an overarching strategy, what we have is piecemeal support.”
Hayward noted the government had set out various reforms to boost the City and wider economy — including plans to overhaul EU era regulation of insurance companies called Solvency II and rules covering financial markets known as Mifid II.
However, Hayward said there was “no plan for implementation” in relation to some of the government’s reforms.
The City of London Corporation report noted the government’s Mansion House compact announced in July, in which ministers set a goal of securing £75bn of investment by pension funds in high growth companies and other businesses.
The local authority said “cultural change” was needed to divert more pension money into areas such as venture capital.
Hayward said: “What we are trying to do is actually make sure we hold politicians’ feet to the fire.”
Analysis by the City of London Corporation and consultants Oliver Wyman estimated the proposals to boost the financial and professional services sectors would unlock £225bn of investment and economic growth into the UK by 2030.
Hayward said the £225bn — which consists of a £100bn boost from the insurance overhaul, £75bn from pension changes and £50bn from net zero investment — would not be achieved “if the reforms aren’t implemented”.
Other recommendations in the City of London Corporation report included promoting better use of data among regulators and developing an online system for company records similar to the US Edgar system.
Eight companies co-authored the report: asset manager Schroders, banks JPMorgan and Barclays, auditors EY and KPMG, insurance market Lloyd’s of London, cyber security company Glasswall and think-tank the Centre for Information Policy Leadership.
Sheila Nicoll, senior public policy adviser at Schroders, said the public-private partnership would “provide a significant opportunity to help us build on our competitive advantages in the sector”.
Chris Woolard, an EY partner, said: “There is momentum for collaboration across high-growth sectors and the recommendations . . . are important, tangible steps to ensure financial services continue to support strong economic growth for the UK long term.”
Hayward said: “We are making the case for a financial and professional services road map that helps drive growth across the UK for the rest of the decade and beyond. We look forward to working with the government and other partners to deliver it.”
As the local authority for the Square Mile, the City of London Corporation provides services and promotes the financial district as a place to work and live.
Of course, they're calling for an acceleration of public money poured into private asset management funds (registered beyond the UK's fiscal jurisdiction). Sounds like they're gearing up for the next New Labour administration.The City is punting for a taste of raids on pension funds, net zero investment planning and insurance sector money as "PPP investment." Usual financial mafia suspects.
City of London calls for public-private partnership to grow sectors