Serge Forward
Just enjoyin' my coffee.
It's not "our" fucking economy.And yet here we are; the cranks and headbangers in charge and our economy in the toilet. No one has provided any example of how brexit was the right decision.
It's not "our" fucking economy.And yet here we are; the cranks and headbangers in charge and our economy in the toilet. No one has provided any example of how brexit was the right decision.
Nice going glitchhikerI don't need to be gaslighted you fucking loser
Still haven't demonstrated how brexit, orchestrated by racists and fascists, has ventured the working class.It's not "our" fucking economy.
Exactly; why Take back control was such false consciousness.It's not "our" fucking economy.
I'm a bit of a broken record on this too, but I don't think it's a case of being critical, it's a case of something not being quite what it appeared to be. There was some discussion of Labourism before the thread took it's Brexit turn. EiE looked really positive because it looked like it was breaking out of Labourims and the idea that the working class has 2 wings, the political and the industrial and that the Labour Party and TUC have the franchises sown up on these. It broke out of that with the idea of community organising, which carries with the it the idea of something, almost by definition, isn't controlled from the top and isn't necessarily given the job of harvesting souls for the Labour Party. The other break out was the potential for direct action, direct action not necessarily in the sense of the illegal, more the idea of mutual aid - union members and others working on food, heating and clothing for example. And yes, I know some unions do this to a degree, support initiatives already in existence, but this had the promise of something more sustained.If Lynch and Dempsey are part of some initiative that you want to criticise then it’d be more helpful if you focussed on them rather than saying it’s the RMT.
I’m annoyed because EIE has nothing to do with branch level but it’s a criticism levelled at the union as a whole. At branch level, for example, you get requests for eg winter solidarity funds for backlisted miners and their families which are voted in favour unanimously but nobody gets to hear about that as it isn’t publicised.I'm a bit of a broken record on this too, but I don't think it's a case of being critical, it's a case of something not being quite what it appeared to be. There was some discussion of Labourism before the thread took it's Brexit turn. EiE looked really positive because it looked like it was breaking out of Labourims and the idea that the working class has 2 wings, the political and the industrial and that the Labour Party and TUC have the franchises sown up on these. It broke out of that with the idea of community organising, which carries with the it the idea of something, almost by definition, isn't controlled from the top and isn't necessarily given the job of harvesting souls for the Labour Party. The other break out was the potential for direct action, direct action not necessarily in the sense of the illegal, more the idea of mutual aid - union members and others working on food, heating and clothing for example. And yes, I know some unions do this to a degree, support initiatives already in existence, but this had the promise of something more sustained.
So, by definition, I'm not going have a go at unions who fighting massive struggles for their member at the moment and have also shown signs of a new way of thinking about the relationship between the class and the labour movement. It's just, gah, the fact that it doesn't seem to have happened or is happening on a local basis* only suggests that Labourism is being bent and stretched, but not broken.
* As opposed to a 'national programme of local organising' iyswim.
Anyway, apologies for derailing this Brexit thread with some Enough is Enough chat, but saw this, and:
I feel like this is an example of what my issue with EiE is - I'm not interested in slagging off the RMT and CWU for not being the CNT or FORA, and I'm not even really interested in slagging off EiE for being less radical than Don't Pay, although I do wish they were working together more, I just feel like... with the resources they have available to them, they should really be doing more stuff? Like, I don't think it's setting up an impossible standard to say that, by this point, they could've found a few local groups running warm hubs and thrown a bit of cash at them in exchange for them agreeing to call themselves EiE warm hubs and running stalls where people can learn more about the campaign and trade unionism? I dunno, possibly getting to be a bit of a broken record at this point, but well done to Don't Pay Lewisham anyway.
Like, I don't think it's setting up an impossible standard to say that, by this point, they could've found a few local groups running warm hubs and thrown a bit of cash at them in exchange for them agreeing to call themselves EiE warm hubs and running stalls where people can learn more about the campaign and trade unionism? I dunno, possibly getting to be a bit of a broken record at this point, but well done to Don't Pay Lewisham anyway.
There was some discussion of Labourism before the thread took it's Brexit turn. EiE looked really positive because it looked like it was breaking out of Labourims and the idea that the working class has 2 wings, the political and the industrial and that the Labour Party and TUC have the franchises sown up on these. It broke out of that with the idea of community organising, which carries with the it the idea of something, almost by definition, isn't controlled from the top and isn't necessarily given the job of harvesting souls for the Labour Party. The other
Like, I don't think it's setting up an impossible standard to say that, by this point, they could've found a few local groups running warm hubs and thrown a bit of cash at them in exchange for them agreeing to call themselves EiE warm hubs and running stalls where people can learn more about the campaign and trade unionism?
Anyway, apologies for derailing this Brexit thread with some Enough is Enough chat, but saw this, and:
I feel like this is an example of what my issue with EiE is - I'm not interested in slagging off the RMT and CWU for not being the CNT or FORA, and I'm not even really interested in slagging off EiE for being less radical than Don't Pay, although I do wish they were working together more, I just feel like... with the resources they have available to them, they should really be doing more stuff? Like, I don't think it's setting up an impossible standard to say that, by this point, they could've found a few local groups running warm hubs and thrown a bit of cash at them in exchange for them agreeing to call themselves EiE warm hubs and running stalls where people can learn more about the campaign and trade unionism? I dunno, possibly getting to be a bit of a broken record at this point, but well done to Don't Pay Lewisham anyway.
Soul, punk and Irish music as I remember. Very engaging fella, well read politically, and an absolute nightmare with the fash. When him and others were expelled a number of us in the SWP involved in physical anti fascism debated what to do and most of us ( for better or worse) stayed . He never bore a grudge against the members it was the leadership that he opposed. You could have a pint , have a discussion and even if you disagreed , leave on comradely terms . There’s a few ex posters on here knew him as well .Possibly a Quo fan with that outfit and the hand in jean pockets