Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Find a capitalist in this caseMake a stupid noise
Find a capitalist in this caseMake a stupid noise
That seems unlikely given their total control of the political narrative and the media. Starmer's lead won't last as he has nothing to back it up. The Tories have successfully blamed the EU for everything even after leaving. People believe it.Which the Conservatives will be blamed/punished for and they can no longer hide behind the EU as an excuse like previously.
There's an entire thread on this, why not go and read it, it's the eu's time is up one, soz the eu watch onewhat laws and conditions that we would be subject to in the EU are worse than what the Tories offer?
The tories have total control of the media and the political narrative? There speaks a conspiraloonThat seems unlikely given their total control of the political narrative and the media. Starmer's lead won't last as he has nothing to back it up. The Tories have successfully blamed the EU for everything even after leaving. People believe it.
What a stupid comment. Why not take your tedious passive aggressive bullshit and fuck off.The tories have total control of the media and the political narrative? There speaks a conspiraloon
It's by no means anywhere near as stupid as yours. The mirror and the guardian leap to mind as non-tory papers while the star's contrast of liz truss with a lettuce was hardly a Tory ploy. And yeh Boris Johnson was so firmly in control of the political narrative this summer. Oh - and dull swearing doesn't persuadeWhat a stupid comment. Why not take your tedious passive aggressive bullshit and fuck off.
Those two papers are barely left wing and their opposition to the Tories seems minimal. The Guardian isn't taken seriously while the tories have much of the media in their back pocket as evidenced by their power over electoral propaganda. Taking my comment literally is stupid: the point is that the Tories have a dominance in the public consciousness that Labour hasn't matched. It's only because of their temporary loss of control under Truss that Labour surged. Starmer wasn't able to make any real headway during the pandemic despite everything he had to work with. People STILL think Boris either did a good job, or deserves a break because the pandemic wasn't his fault.It's by no means anywhere near as stupid as yours. The mirror and the guardian leap to mind as non-tory papers while the star's contrast of liz truss with a lettuce was hardly a Tory ploy. And yeh Boris Johnson was so firmly in control of the political narrative this summer. Oh - and dull swearing doesn't persuade
We've commented at length on a) The way even the most tepid watered-down social democratic notions won't be accepted by the parliamentary labour party, even though they're very popular with the electorate, b) that shammer's main difference with the tories is that he'd like to pursue their policies more efficiently than the current administration, and c) the ineptitude of the guardian.Those two papers are barely left wing and their opposition to the Tories seems minimal. The Guardian isn't taken seriously while the tories have much of the media in their back pocket as evidenced by their power over electoral propaganda. Taking my comment literally is stupid: the point is that the Tories have a dominance in the public consciousness that Labour hasn't matched. It's only because of their temporary loss of control under Truss that Labour surged. Starmer wasn't able to make any real headway during the pandemic despite everything he had to work with. People STILL think Boris either did a good job, or deserves a break because the pandemic wasn't his fault.
Was Boris firmly in control of the media narrative? Let's see: he's enjoyed two months off without criticism after being forced to resign. He very nearly came back after Truss failed. It wasn't the corruption, lies, hypocrisy, law breaking, or death count that did for him either, it was standing by Chris Pinscher. Throughout all that the media made excuses for him calling people to get over it (all the above). Meanwhile Jeremy Corbyn was portrayed as the worst human alive during his time as left wing leader. A mild social democrat in actuality.
So yes, there is no guarantee that, in any forthcomoig election, the Tories will lose. Likely, perhaps. But by no means off the table. Waiting, then, for Brexit to bear fruit, whatever that looks like, is a very risky proposition. What will be left of society?
EU oversight of what ?EU oversight offers more than the Tories will give us.
Lots of things can turn any old debate into a Brexit one, but any discussion containing the RMT is like catnip for some.For fuck's sake, I go on holiday and leave youse lot to your own devices for one bloody weekend and when I come back you've turned the Enough is Enough thread into a Brexit battle re-enactment. I imagine this is how a disappointed teacher feels when they come back and learns the class spent the whole of the substitute teacher's lesson arguing about Brexit, or something.
I always remember the schadenfreude expressed by some remainers that RMT members had lost their jobs at P&OLots of things can turn any old debate into a Brexit one, but any discussion containing the RMT is like catnip for some.
That's dark as fuck.I always remember the schadenfreude expressed by some remainers that RMT members had lost their jobs at P&O
things like limits on hours worked etc.EU oversight of what ?
The Working Time Directive you mean?things like limits on hours worked etc.
I know what you meant. QE is a process that happens on the books of the Bank of England. The money created by QE never leaves the central bank's balance sheet. It certainly is not an operation performed by government, though there is an exchange of letters between the Chancellor and Governor of the Bank whenever there is a significant change. And thanks for the links, but I do know exactly how it works - it happens to be my job to know.I was talking about QE
The money ends up in the sterling settlement reserve accounts held by commercial banks at the Bank of England. Those banks in turn credit the accounts of their customers who have sold bonds to the Bank of England. Such customers will have swapped illiquid assets (government bonds) for liquid assets (cash). They may or may not have made a profit on the sale of the bonds.Here’s the BoE version of events - if you look closely with a inquiring eye on where the money ends up, you may see the outline of a mechanism seemingly designed deliberately to enrich the wealthy at the expense of everyone else:
It's like if someone started a thread about how there's too many "time's up" threads, and then somehow it got turned into yet another R2D2 vs the world thread arguing about Russia and Ukraine.Lots of things can turn any old debate into a Brexit one, but any discussion containing the RMT is like catnip for some.
Anybody could be forgiven for thinking the Ukraine war, and its possible development into WW3. isn't the most important thing happening in the world. Not to mention a major factor in the cost of livng crisis (see the way the US seems to be edging the Zelensky gang towards being open to negotiations.)It's like if someone started a thread about how there's too many "time's up" threads, and then somehow it got turned into yet another R2D2 vs the world thread arguing about Russia and Ukraine.
The money ends up in the sterling settlement reserve accounts held by commercial banks at the Bank of England. Those banks in turn credit the accounts of their customers who have sold bonds to the Bank of England. Such customers will have swapped illiquid assets (government bonds) for liquid assets (cash). They may or may not have made a profit on the sale of the bonds.
Hope that helps.
Some people are ideologically pro EU but a lot of the arguments in favour were simply that the tendencies of the UK capitalist class were tempered by it. It's not a great radical argument or a movement-oriented argument but it is a pragmatic argument that recognises that yes, we did get protections from it we wouldn't otherwise have had.
To your first question, it depends on the seller's situation. It may be that they are looking to realise a profit, or it may be that they have an immediate need for liquid assets and may therefore be willing to accept a loss. This was not unusual in 2009 when QE first started in the UK.And on average, is a profit made on the sale of these bonds?
And also, on average, how often are the sellers of these bonds working class, or on Universal Credit, or scraping by on benefits alone?
To your first question, it depends on the seller's situation. It may be that they are looking to realise a profit, or it may be that they have an immediate need for liquid assets and may therefore be willing to accept a loss. This was not unusual in 2009 when QE first started in the UK.
To your second question, they are almost always institutions such as pension funds, investment funds or overseas investors.
Anybody could be forgiven for thinking the Ukraine war, and its possible development into WW3. isn't the most important thing happening in the world. Not to mention a major factor in the cost of livng crisis (see the way the US seems to be edging the Zelensky gang towards being open to negotiations.)
I am not.Are you an auditor, by any chance?
Maybe one day you'll actually be able to provide a good argument for why we left and how our trade is meant to recover from closing access to a market our economy depends on. In the meantime I'll continue to enjoy being lectured on radical politics by a no mark wannabe who's been fuck wrong this entire time. Have funBy some people, I guess you mean Remain supporters as that certainly wasn’t the argument of the minority of ‘the left’ (really the right wing of the movement embodied by Roy Jenkins) that supported joining the EU and backed remaining it in the first referendum.
The idea - that the EU was some sort of break on neo-liberalism or that it’s a social democratic institution - really belongs in the 1990’s and to a group of trade union leaders and labour MPs defeated by Thatcher and desperately imputing on to the EU wish fulfilment to cover up its own inability to defend the organised working class and the communities they allegedly served.
The fact the the argument prevails 30 years later tells us something about those peddling it, and it also tells us that the entire economic principles on which the bloc is founded has somehow passed by those clinging to the mirage of ‘social Europe’
Maybe one day you'll actually be able to provide a good argument for why we left and how our trade is meant to recover from closing access to a market our economy depends on. In the meantime I'll continue to enjoy being lectured on radical politics by a no mark wannabe who's been fuck wrong this entire time. Have fun
I am not.
What facts? You've aligned yourself with fascists, racists, little Englanders, billionaire anti working class liars and the fucking Kremlin! Calling my response 'rage' shows you aren't even taking your own bullshit seriously.You can rage all you like Karl but they are the facts. The only people who believe in the existence of social Europe are John Monks and his generation of failed union tops from the 1990’s and planet remain in 2022.
By the way a) we haven’t closed our market to the EU or vice versa as the withdrawal agreement makes abundantly clear and b) if you think either the long run economic performance of the British economy or the current crisis are related to membership of the EU then you’ve not been following things very closely.
‘No mark wannabe‘: I like it