Stokes is a batter who bowls. He's always been expensive with the ball, but capable of taking wickets and getting swing on occasion, and he's the one who does the short theory stuff occasionally a la Neil Wagner (but not as good at it as Neil Wagner) when the ball gets soft. He's the fourth seamer, or fifth seamer in this team.
I'd have played Wood as well, but take those catches and England wouldn't have done so bad necessarily. 220-2 looks good. 220-5 would not have looked good at all.
A very good toss to win, unfortunately, but England are not quite out of it yet. Aus need one more good session to be properly on top.
I didn't watch any of it, but the stats were saying that only 5 % of the balls would have hit the stumps yesterday. A case of Anderson and Broad bowling dry at the expense of taking edges? It wouldn't be the first time.