If the tories suggested government control if the internet, members if this forum would go apeshit.
Russia is now insisting all new phones have local software, China controls the population with QQ, and many other governments have used internet access to control their population's ability to communicate.
It can be controlled a lot more effectively if it's run by the state.
Can't troooomp just be banned? Impossible to have anything approaching a decent discussion with him around. His stupidity is so dense it has its own gravitational pull that drags you in and makes you respond to the cunt, then you're an unwitting accomplice in his mission to dumb down and bore.
He saves that for when he wants to do some groomingI doubt that I'd get much gratification from an indecent discussion with him, either.
When you hit on someone you hope for a sexual relationship with themHardly matters - The press and politicians will hit on any Labour MPs that went to private schools and worse, use labour MPs that send their kids to private schools as examples of hypocritical cunts.
The idea of taxing them is fine, but Labour can't do it without losing votes unless they stop all of their people using private schools.
Of course I'm sure no Labour front benchers have kids in private schools - oops
Even May, and she was serious crap, managed to attack Labour on that one, but Corbyn is far too fucking stupid to realise, even when he's been told.
Idiocy like this is losing votes and giving the fucking tories an easy ride.
All of this will be pulled apart when Labour gets smashed at the polls in a few weeks, then hopefully so.e common fucking sense will find its way in and the idiotic policies dumped when Corbyn goes. I want the tories out and a Labour government in, but there's zero chance until stupidity gets left behind.
Yes, I know I'm not left wing enough for some here, but left wing is allowing the tories, especially the tory right, every opportunity to fuck up Britain.
The Labour left has learnt nothing from their fuck ups of old, and that means a tory government.
New Labour, who abolished the cycle of boom and bustDon't do or propose anything that the press might not like. That approach worked so well under New Labour, right?
He probably wants to groom them too the sick manWhen you hit on someone you hope for a sexual relationship with them
Should start with grooming himself, it's likely weeks if not months since he washed and shavedHe probably wants to groom them too the sick man
I know. I had a response ready to go, but I just thought, what’s the point?. His stupidity is so dense it has its own gravitational pull that drags you in and makes you respond to the cunt, then you're an unwitting accomplice in his mission to dumb down and bore.
Hardly matters - The press and politicians will hit on any Labour MPs that went to private schools and worse, use labour MPs that send their kids to private schools as examples of hypocritical cunts.
The idea of taxing them is fine, but Labour can't do it without losing votes unless they stop all of their people using private schools.
Of course I'm sure no Labour front benchers have kids in private schools - oops
Even May, and she was serious crap, managed to attack Labour on that one, but Corbyn is far too fucking stupid to realise, even when he's been told.
Idiocy like this is losing votes and giving the fucking tories an easy ride.
All of this will be pulled apart when Labour gets smashed at the polls in a few weeks, then hopefully so.e common fucking sense will find its way in and the idiotic policies dumped when Corbyn goes. I want the tories out and a Labour government in, but there's zero chance until stupidity gets left behind.
Yes, I know I'm not left wing enough for some here, but left wing is allowing the tories, especially the tory right, every opportunity to fuck up Britain.
The Labour left has learnt nothing from their fuck ups of old, and that means a tory government.
Well the faq says the most important rule of the boards is don't be a dick and he's a total fucking dick. I agree we should at least be able to ban his idiocy from the politics forums.Can't troooomp just be banned? Impossible to have anything approaching a decent discussion with him around. His stupidity is so dense it has its own gravitational pull that drags you in and makes you respond to the cunt, then you're an unwitting accomplice in his mission to dumb down and bore.
I’m not in favour of banning idiots I am in favour of zero engagement, replies and moving on to better discussions/rows/punch ups
Well I'm fucking not, outside now!
Or for that matter, the navy, the police, or anything else the state traditionally runs. The moment you concede any natural monopoly to state ownership, you've conceded the principle, and it's just a question of where the line's drawn. Personally, I'd nationalize all natural monopolies -- if there can be no competition, unaccountable private control's oppressive -- so on this, bravo Labour.Weird that all these people going 'oh no state control of the internet' but not oh no state control of the post
Or for that matter, the navy, the police, or anything else the state traditionally runs. The moment you concede any natural monopoly to state ownership, you've conceded the principle, and it's just a question of where the line's drawn. Personally, I'd nationalize all natural monopolies -- if there can be no competition, unaccountable private control's oppressive -- so on this, bravo Labour.
There seems to be a hint of 'blue labour's' (sorry) attempt to breathe some life into guild socialism in those economic suggestions of various forms of socialisation not trad nationalism. At first glance anyway, haven't had time to dig deeper yet but will be looking for that.
Yup, I’ve had a glance through and it’s very light on detail. Like I said I expected, it reads like “eventually” and “as far as possible”, and little more than that. I’ll need to read in more depth, but there’s nothing about workplace democracy that wouldn’t fit in the Limehouse Declaration.The manifesto is silent on the exact nature of what is proposed. Terms are interchangeable and bandied about sloppily by Labour types.
I accept these are complex matters and that negotiation (hopefully starting with the appropriate unions) is necessary. But, it feels airy.
Wouldn't mind Singapore's public housing system tbh.North Atlantic Singapore under Johnson,