emanymton
A cat politely sat on the flaming gardener.
By criminalising it and generally creating an even more inhospitable environment for the homeless I imagine.
By criminalising it and generally creating an even more inhospitable environment for the homeless I imagine.
Interesting chart
Shit flounce is shit flounceBecause the tories were a fucking mess. Labour only ever do well when the tories fuck up, not because they're any good.
If that changes, we see Labour governments that stay in power.
On a personal note, my mum is in long term care and absolutely dependent on good NHS services, but Labour losing all the time means tories, and tories fuck up the NHS.
What's the difference between unemployed and not working in that chart?
As part of the demographic in question I can't say I'd miss it myself. I certainly won't be voting for any of these fuckers.Electoral reform... take the vote off over-65s?
one of the other issues as i have been reading is for some time, some of the red wall, is not really that constituency any more, Newcastle Under Lyme for example, is now full of retirees, commuters, a few ex mining towns are like that.
interesting that, would be (fairly) curious to see per seat demographics including on the vote itself. Of course its true that grassroots politics have to be done by local people - you cant/wouldn't want to parachute/astroturf - which leads to the question, who lives in place X exactly to engage in this? Age as well as wealth is an issue too
(not sure as change since when on that graph but gives an impresion)
Good piece in Freedom on this change in rural/small town demographics
The left’s generation crisis: How can we grow without seeds?
Obviously true corbyn was a problem but that drop from '17 (when more popular than miliband, brown, and tail end 'bush and' blair) to '19 - what changed there then. Rhetorical btw.Love this pre-election satisfaction chart. Corbyn's popularity compared with other elections. No one can say Corbyn wasn't a problem but Boris wasn't great either.View attachment 194219
Obviously true corbyn was a problem but that drop from '17 (when more popular than miliband, brown, and tail end 'bush and' blair) to '19 - what changed there then. Rhetorical btw.
Anti semitism.Obviously true corbyn was a problem but that drop from '17 (when more popular than miliband, brown, and tail end 'bush and' blair) to '19 - what changed there then. Rhetorical btw.
They took him seriously so the media pile-on went into overdrive.
shame the Labour Party couldn’t have played up stuff like his virtuousness on expenses (versus Johnson who once tried to put his £30 cenotaph wreath on expenses) but the opposition doesn’t get to choose the battlegrounds.
Anti semitism.
They took him seriously so the media pile-on went into overdrive.
shame the Labour Party couldn’t have played up stuff like his virtuousness on expenses (versus Johnson who once tried to put his £30 cenotaph wreath on expenses) but the opposition doesn’t get to choose the battlegrounds.
Very reminiscent of the last time this was brought up after the EU ref...turns out that the claims of 1.1m PVs going astray was..er...basically made up of those who had decided not to vote, missed the deadline or forgot to put their mark on the paper.What do we make of the claims of fraud by postal vote emerging on Twitter? A load of bollocks - probably.
It will be interesting to see if this one has legs, as an urban legend if nothing else.
A little thought about pensioners, material conditions aside:Electoral reform... take the vote off over-65s?
e2a: ...tongue firmly in cheek...
Don't buy the second bit. It's not so long ago that labour was unquestioningly the socialist party. If anything older people should think this less odd rather than more.A little thought about pensioners, material conditions aside:
-they are proportionally far more reliant on traditional media than younger people + more likely to be duped by false information
-and also: was talking to someone recently with Ukrainian heritage, and she made what may be a good point (hard to know if its true or not) that for this generation of pensioners - if aged 75 now would've been 30 in 1975 - they may perhaps be more likely to have both negative attitudes towards (20th Century) Communism and also with a socialist Labour Party more broadly.
Connotations might slip towards authoritarianism, the winter of discontent, and the usual reds under the bed / cold war stuff. The Corbyn was a spy/Russian lacky slurs play well to that prejudice. Possibly much more baggage there than for younger voters
tbh, I think the second point is potentially quite a credible affective trigger for the 70+ cohort.Don't buy the second bit. It's not so long ago that labour was unquestioningly the socialist party. If anything older people should think this less odd rather than more.
Fair points but I'm thinking that for some in that cohort we're dealing more with the affective domain than the results of any substantial historical analysis.Was fear of The Reds really ever that strong here, other than among a small cohort of right-wingers? There was never any real purge of 'communists' here in the UK. In fact those purged in the US came here to escape the red menace hysteria. Fear of nuclear war, sure, but not actual fear of communist takeover from within. The 80+ cohort will remember just about a time when Britain reacted to winning WW2 by electing a socialist government that did very socialist things. They may remember that 'commies' fought the Nazis.
Funnily enough I had a Xmas phone call from an old mate of mine who managed to slag off Corbyn as a Marxist cunt but then said he would have been better off if Labour had won. His main thing was that he agreed with most of Labours economic stuff ( except the broad band promise) but was against Communism . I’ve had similar conversations with Portuguese friends who vote Left Block but are aghast when I say I quite like the Portuguese Communist Party . Perhaps there’s a thing about Communism with all the baggage of Russia etc being seen as an outside threat but basic economic equality policies seen as a step forward ?Fair points but I'm thinking that for some in that cohort we're dealing more with the affective domaine than the results of any substantial historical analysis.
As some may feel that things were better before the EEC meddled in our affairs, so they may harbour a long constructed belief that communism (and anything that they were/are told smacked of it) was/is a also a threat to former/potential better times for our sceptred isle.