frogwoman
No amount of cajolery...
Ahead of the game...
Needs to be changed to Corbyn's face on it.
Ahead of the game...
Good. She's an utter cunt. I had little opinion of her before she took over from Cameron. I've since come to detest her at least on a par with Gideon, Lansley, Hunt, or IDS.just watching the highlights on the news. As an edit it sounds better for him/worse for her.
Would anyone change their vote as a result?
You are right...But I think the issue is they don't frame it in terms of killing people, they frame it terms of protecting people.
While we hear "I won't kill people", they hear "I won't protect you".
Mars not Earth.
Ahead of the game...
The stronger man has the backbone to talk.Not on the issue but again it's about impressions - has he got the backbone to fight? Is he weak?
Start a thread on it, there's a couple of people (at least) on U75 that have said that it's one of the reasons why they won't vote for Corbyn
The innate historical awareness we all have that tells us that if we don't have a place on the World Stage then the people who do will happily fuck us over.
"National pride", bragging rights, feeling important, that bollocks.
This guy is a potential minister of defence in a future Tory government. You can tell by the stain spreading on his pants as he talks about nuking people.
Indeed. I wish they'd do that more often, to be honest. Ask the public to justify their mad ideas.I dunno why he didn't just turn it round and ask em to explain, hey all you von Brauns with the uncontrollable Strangelove eyebrows, tell us how we're ever going to nuke anyone without getting nuked back by everyone else.
Steely British resolve I expect, and a really big umbrella.
Nah but he was quite wooden in his reply. The no first use phrase is fine, but you at least need a reply as to what happens when the bombs start flying. It's all bollocks, all nonsense, there's no real 'correct' answer, but he still should have had a better form of words to hand.Would anyone change their vote as a result?
It would (IMO) have been a far easier option for Corbyn to set out some specifics:I'm not convinced that banging on about nuking people or not is a great tactical move by the Tories.
Labour should just keep on about social care, education etc. on the doorstep and not get sidetracked here.
Would anyone change their vote as a result?
he does have that weird chin wobble thing going onIs he related to Redwood?!
He did vote for Trident tbfI dunno why he didn't just turn it round and ask em to explain, hey all you von Brauns with the uncontrollable Strangelove eyebrows, tell us how we're ever going to nuke anyone without getting nuked back by everyone else.
Steely British resolve I expect, and a really big umbrella.
They haven't stopped him getting any votes in a GE. Wait till there are votes to be counted.Defence and the IRA stop him getting the extra votes he needs...
The debate -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> logicThe defence thing is undermined a bit by the fact that Theresa cut the numbers of police and accused them of scaremongering though?
The debate -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> logic