Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

TfL denied Uber operator license, ride hailing service wins on appeal (Sept 2020)

I talk to a few Black can drivers. One of them said to me that Uber should not have been allowed into London as it's not like an old fashioned mini cab working locally from an office. It works in central London like hailing a cab. Ive seen it in central London. People waiting on pavement looking at phone seeing nearest Uber and getting them to come and pick them up. So his argument was that Uber was the same as hailing a Black cab in effect.

I don't think this is the reason why TFL is not renewing license but from the few Black cab drivers I now that above is a major issue. It wouldn't matter so much but Uber is undercutting Black cabs. As the cabbies I know say Uber is direct competition. It's not like old type of mini cab firm. Uber isn't allowed near central London stations. Which is why so many Black cabs are seen queuing at say Paddington or Kings Cross.

I have a lot of sympathy for Black cab drivers. The ones I know have done other delivery jobs. Being a Black cab driver is first time they have been paid well. Unlike previous jobs.
 
Last edited:
People being blind to exploitation cos of convenience, and being extravagant about transport is though.
Though not all of us have earned more as they've got older

Agree with this 100% and imagine that what you are talking about is exactly right, people earning more and getting increased positions of privilege leads to socially harmful opinions but sadly these sorts of views are not limited to people not in precarious employment, there are increasingly seen as common sense across society including people who are nominally on the left.

All of this of course is a function of people seeing themselves as consumers rather than workers.
 
Uber being more 'affordable'/convenient just means there are now more private hire vehicles operating in London than ever, clogging the roads, getting in the way of buses, adding to pollution. In a city with the public transport infrastructure London has it should be taxed as a luxury.
 
Uber being more 'affordable'/convenient just means there are now more private hire vehicles operating in London than ever, clogging the roads, getting in the way of buses, adding to pollution. In a city with the public transport infrastructure London has it should be taxed as a luxury.
Agree with this, with the minor proviso that the very small minority of people who use taxis out of need rather than convenience should of course be properly protected. But that was true long before uber existed. And the tax should be put directly into subsidising public transport, as the congestion charge is.

But yes to the basic point - if it is true that more people in London than ever are using taxis, then this isn't a good thing. It is not to be encouraged, and that's why this is something that needs to be socially managed not left to some imagined market. So I also agree with crispy that taxis should be brought under the umbrella of tfl, who would also then set the permissible numbers. If people don't like it, they can catch one of the very many buses that are provided like the rest of us somehow manage to do all the time.
 
Last edited:
Back in the 90s , the night bus service was awful. You could indeed take hours to get home. Wasn't pleasant. The service is miles better now. Unrecognisable really.
 
What companies did this ? The places i worked as a controller would always give a driver something "going his/hers way home. Was this a cash or account circuit ?

Account circuits. Cash drivers would just tell you to fuck off. I'm still a controller btw. You always try to give a job home but we live in a somewhat divided city where more of the drivers live east and most of the people we drive about live west (very roughly speaking). That's not to say I would ever finish a bloke who lives in Forest Gate on a job to Twickenham on pain of losing his bonus but I've seen such things done or at least demanded by operations managers.
 
Uber is all account work. A mini cab driver doesn't have to hand over a penny from a cash fare to his office.
That's why I specified account work. IME most firms take a lot less if anything from drivers on cash work these days.

Cash circuit drivers of course have to pay rent which can add up to a hefty percentage in a shit week.
 
This uber ban is a really good way of ferreting out neoliberals. Uber is such an obviously disgusting company, but it is vaguely associated with cosmopolitanism and 'socially liberal' techno-futurism so the very worst in our society rally to its banner immediately.
 
Get a bicycle you lazy twat.
I am. Sore point. I'm still waiting for my collection letter. Was hoping to have it by now.

But I wouldn't cycle when drunk. I hate the twats that do that. I feel sorrier for the poor sod who runs them over than I do for them.
 
This uber ban is a really good way of ferreting out neoliberals. Uber is such an obviously disgusting company, but it is vaguely associated with cosmopolitanism and 'socially liberal' techno-futurism so the very worst in our society rally to its banner immediately.
from comments elsewhere theres a sense that some people are gagging for a union to blame. Hence conspiracy theories like the black cab drivers running tfl
 
Back
Top Bottom