Is this a sign of ultra politically correct intersectionalists turning in on themselves or victims of heinous sexual assault and even rape gaining some some sort of justice and reconciliation.
I'm inclined to believe that this is a complete load of bollox and that a lot is going on behind the scenes with this issue regarding Annie !
That is bad. So bad I can't "like" your post, but thank you for posting the link.
I realise that as an SWP member, you must do your best to pretend you're not in the most hated organisation on the left, but even you must know that above sentence is moronic drivel. The issue in the SWP was how you pretended that there was nothing to investigate, that Smith was a naughty hero, and that it was okay to ask a rape victim 'But you like s drink, dont you?' and generally did your utmost to cover up the appalling abuse. If every word in the above statements is true, they are a long way shy of amounting to anything like the same thing as the disgrace of the SWP. You're still a member aren't you? Coming back here to try to shitstir and cover for your own groups continued failings.If true*, then it's extraordinary that in it's short life the ISN managed to exceed the many failings of the SWP in this regard.
it's not 'a game'And you have no skin in this game?
hard for a defunct organisation to deal with issues that were never brought up when it existed.Maybe instead of confabulating stories about the SWP you can use the example of the ISN to show how such complaints should be handled.
bullshit. You wrote "in it's short life the ISN managed to exceed the many failings of the SWP in this regard" - which is a statement of such astounding lack of truth, and utter dishonesty as to beggar belief. Your group took part in a cover up, and most of the leading figures in that cover up are still leading figures in your, ageing, shrinking, group.I didn't post the link or defame ISN and RS21, if you're looking for a shitstirrer get a mirror.
it's not 'a game'
hard for a defunct organisation to deal with issues that were never brought up when it existed.
That is not what the complaint said. It explicitly said the sex was consensual. That you are trying to twist her words to suit your own vile argument just shows how low you are happy to sink. You have learnt nothing.Nope, it's 'a metaphor' durh!
So let me see if I've got this right - a woman was repeatedly raped by a leading member of the ISN and, because of the levels of abuse she received on another complaint, was unable to raise the rape issue 'in time.' So no problems there then.
Nope, it's 'a metaphor' durh!
So let me see if I've got this right - a woman was repeatedly raped by a leading member of the ISN and, because of the levels of abuse she received on another complaint, was unable to raise the rape issue 'in time.' So no problems there then.
Where has repeatedly raped come from? She says there was only one incident of sexual assault?Nope, it's 'a metaphor' durh!
So let me see if I've got this right - a woman was repeatedly raped by a leading member of the ISN and, because of the levels of abuse she received on another complaint, was unable to raise the rape issue 'in time.' So no problems there then.
To quote:That is not what the complaint said. It explicitly said the sex was consensual. That you are trying to twist her words to suit your own vile argument just shows how low you are happy to sink. You have learnt nothing.
"This was the only time sexual relations with him felt like sexual assault so I confided in a friend not very long after the incident and she advised me that consent boundaries were crossed."
My emphasis.
You are a liar, Trappist, and are behaving disgustingly in trying to use this case to justify your own inaction over Delta and his fans still controlling your sect. Utterly vile behaviour on your part.
...the whole Martin Smith affair led the SWP to review and revise its internal disciplinary procedures. This was done openly, opinions were solicited and the drafts published for comment and amendment. It was discussed, amended and carried at the December 2013 conference and then published. I do not recall the RS21 comrades opposing the new procedure or offering substantial amendments.Whereas in the SWP....
What, the cases that are about two weeks old? Stupid question.
Both issues have led to RS21 ensuring that better procedures are in place should they be required.