Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

SWP expulsions and squabbles

I understand by the way that there are less than 30 faction signatories to the "middle ground appeal and more than 50 non faction, so even if it was intended primarily to split the faction it may actually have caused more division among the loyalists.

Also the faction committee had no truck with it at all.
 
What does iDooM stand for? Sounds like the apocalypse brought to you by apple mac
doommonsters.jpg


Note the health, very nearly game over.
 
In defence of our Martin, a joke reference to the secret ultra-rabid loyalist factioneers stemming from the period when the opposition faction was called In defence of our party.

So the people putting out stuff like 'statement for our revolutionary party' (my second favourite IB piece after Rhetta's proletarian standpoint stuff)?
 
How long does the SWPs annual conference go on for? I understand that registration started mid afternoon today. Do the actual sessions start this evening?

Also does it finish on Sunday, or does it go on into Monday?

I understand that the conference business per se starts on Saturday and continues until Sunday. Faction meetings will take place this Friday evening and tomorrow evening at the Holy Innocents (!) Church - I hope this doesn't mean that the Faction is being taken for a ride...

The key votes will take place tomorrow: on the apology, the Disputes Commission Review and the CC. The Faction wants to have a winding up meeting on Sunday at 5pm in said church, but the CC is unhappy about this and it's unclear whether it will take place.
 
I understand by the way that there are less than 30 faction signatories to the "middle ground appeal and more than 50 non faction, so even if it was intended primarily to split the faction it may actually have caused more division among the loyalists.
Also the faction committee had no truck with it at all.

That's good news (in the general gloom). Hopefully, the loyalists/idoomers will be at each other's throats tomorrow. There could be some lively sessions - pity it's not livestreamed.
 
So the people putting out stuff like 'statement for our revolutionary party' (my second favourite IB piece after Rhetta's proletarian standpoint stuff)?
Precisely. But the situation is a little more fluid now. As Nigel has pointed out, there are de facto 3 factions: the officially declared Rebuilding the Party, the non-declared Idoomers and now a third middle-of-the-road grouping which includes members from the Faction and IdooM, plus some non-affiliated loyalists.
 
Precisely. But the situation is a little more fluid now. As Nigel has pointed out, there are de facto 3 factions: the officially declared Rebuilding the Party, the non-declared Idoomers and now a third middle-of-the-road grouping which includes members from the Faction and IdooM, plus some non-affiliated loyalists.

This rather simplifies matters. IDOOM is the undeclared, therefore illegal under SWP rules, faction led by Amy Leather on the CC. There is also a CC minority around Charlie Kimber and Alex Callinicos which might be said to hold views similar to those of the majority of less active members. THen we have the grouping around the 'compromise' statement sent out under then names of Paul McGarr and Megan Trudell the latter a member of the Faction while the former is of the centre. Personally I consider this statement to represent a failure of nerve by the soft oppositionists and a rotten bloc that plays into the hands of the iDOOM wreckers. Which means that the Faction contains a capitulationist tendency and a more militant wing too. In any case the fact is that all wings of what is until Monday the SWP are characterised by cliqueism and non-political personal relations the exception being the revolutionary majority of the Faction and odd though it might seem individuals like Kimber and Callinicos.
 
Who gave you the right to decide who is or isn't principled? Maybe a minority of the faction have principled doubts about the course the ISO fans are taking them on.
 
Who gave you the right to decide who is or isn't principled? Maybe a minority of the faction have principled doubts about the course the ISO fans are taking them on.

Did it ever occur to you that the ISO is politically as close to the SWP as any organisation in the world that wasn't founded by the SWP or completely hegemonised by it? And that an ISO "clone" is about the best hope there is of a viable SWPish organisation in the near future?
 
Did it ever occur to you that the ISO is politically as close to the SWP as any organisation in the world that wasn't founded by the SWP or completely hegemonised by it? And that an ISO "clone" is about the best hope there is of a viable SWPish organisation in the near future?
Agree. The SWP is finished. It won't collapse like a pack of cards as did the WRP. I suspect the implosion will be more gradual: an increasingly ageing membership, future splits, others dropping out through demoralisation.... The ISO option is the only valid one. For starters, it could win over the left wing of the ISN + at least some of the students who left in March.
 
Agree. The SWP is finished. It won't collapse like a pack of cards as did the WRP. I suspect the implosion will be more gradual: an increasingly ageing membership, future splits, others dropping out through demoralisation.... The ISO option is the only valid one. For starters, it could win over the left wing of the ISN + at least some of the students who left in March.
I agree the SWP is facing a very slow decline, there will not be the rapid collapse some seem to be expecting. The fact is the SWP has been in decline for years (decades?) this whole fiasco, which is to some extent a result of that decline, will accelerate it somewhat but the SWP will remain a significant presence on the left for many years yet. It will also I think destroy any chance the SWP had of reversing its fortunes.
 
I agree the SWP is facing a very slow decline, there will not be the rapid collapse some seem to be expecting. The fact is the SWP has been in decline for years (decades?) this whole fiasco, which is to some extent a result of that decline, will accelerate it somewhat but the SWP will remain a significant presence on the left for many years yet. It will also I think destroy any chance the SWP had of reversing its fortunes.

And the only reason it will remain a significant presence on the left is because the rest of the left is slowly diminishing as well essentially. Which is not to say that organisations like the Socialist Party cannot maintain a sustainable presence and maybe even go through brief periods of growth around specific issues and circumstances, while the SWP continue to spiral downwards. But their hitherto broad hinterlands of non aligned but sympathetic trade union and community and issue based activists are slowly drifting away from their catchment areas and into different political waters. The SWP crisis has only marginally influenced the drift as well.
 
Back
Top Bottom