You appear to be under the impression that the two words are inter-changeable and mean the same thing.
In the specific context of the sentence I used them in they do mean the same thing.
Really....an absoutely pointless line of challenge.
You appear to be under the impression that the two words are inter-changeable and mean the same thing.
Your example is disingenuous, at the very least far from the whole picture.
In 2000, the council house I was brought up in (in the 60's and 70's) was on the market for £170,000. I.
Months rent £300, What planet?!
They do not create money ( a sub set of wealth ).
And if you think the mere act of borrowing money in itself creates wealth...well...I would have to gve up trying to explain it to you.
let's revisit what you actually said:Ah I get it ! At long last.
Absolute genius. So I mention that one of governments functions is to collect a finite amount of tax and spend it on priorities, that they don't create wealth as such. And the genius proclaims I am wrong because they also borrow.
Forgive me, but doesn't this just add to their outgoings (out of the tax take) in the form of debt repayments (plus interest)
In other words. What in earth is your point !!
yes, they collect a finite amount of tax: but that is not all they have available to spend. i don't know why you're pissing about with the 'government doesn't create money' bit, they do actually (everyone knows the government can print more notes and mint more coins and if that's not creating money fuck knows what is), but i was more concerned with the 'the government can only spend what it collects in taxes' which is fucking nonsense.Please keep in mind...government does not create money. They collect a finite amount of tax and thats all they have available to spend.
QE(d)let's revisit what you actually said:
yes, they collect a finite amount of tax: but that is not all they have available to spend. i don't know why you're pissing about with the 'government doesn't create money' bit, they do actually (everyone knows the government can print more notes and mint more coins and if that's not creating money fuck knows what is), but i was more concerned with the 'the government can only spend what it collects in taxes' which is fucking nonsense.
let's revisit what you actually said:
yes, they collect a finite amount of tax: but that is not all they have available to spend. i don't know why you're pissing about with the 'government doesn't create money' bit, they do actually (everyone knows the government can print more notes and mint more coins and if that's not creating money fuck knows what is), but i was more concerned with the 'the government can only spend what it collects in taxes' which is fucking nonsense.
i don't care what you thought, being as the pope would love your argument. i never said borrowing was an infinite resource, i said that the taxes weren't all the government had to spend.Hmm....thought your argument was that they borrowed...and that this is an infinite resource... Better go back and edit your post....looks like you are changing your tune !
i never advocated printing more money, i simply pointed that the government does indeed create money. perhaps you don't recall in the 1980s when the various m indices were mentioned on the news (i particularly recall m3)It really is this simple isn't it. Yep, more quantitative easing solves all. In fact lets do away with tax altogether and just print money.
Are you guys serious.
i don't care what you thought, being as the pope would love your argument. i never said borrowing was an infinite resource, i said that the taxes weren't all the government had to spend.
Level of (macro-)economic literacy would appear to be consistent with such membership.It's layabout btw - multi-banned poster who once joined the BNP accidentally.
yes. but they don't have to pay it back for years and years and years: it's not like it has to be back next payday or a week friday. the point stands: taxes aren't the only money available to governments. it's not a fucking huge point, so why don't you give way gracefully and post up some more shite you can be taken to task for.Er...yep, they can borrow money.
Er,..but they have to pay it back
= total and utter irrelevance.
yes. but they don't have to pay it back for years and years and years: it's not like it has to be back next payday or a week friday. the point stands: taxes aren't the only money available to governments. it's not a fucking huge point, so why don't you give way gracefully and post up some more shite you can be taken to task for.
Are you guys serious.
What do you folks talk about when people don't come here to offer an alternate point of view ?
Doesn't it get a bit boring ?
What do you folks talk about when people don't come here to offer an alternate point of view ?
Doesn't it get a bit boring ?
We (as in all those criticising you...which I guess is what you mean) are not the ones saying that money and wealth are the same thing
or that governments can only spend what they raise in tax
or that all well paid jobs are hard
or that the only motivation is personal material benefit
or that we know what everybody else thinks and that they think the same as we do.
If I've missed any of your nonsense out I'm sorry, but you have posted quite a bit of garbage. So it would seem that even if we aren't really serious, then at least we are more serious than you; being consistently more thoughtful and better informed.
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
It's not the difference that's the problem. It's the lack of any thought or substantiating evidence that's doing you no favours. But carry on because you're obviously getting something out of it.
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
yes. but i always call a twat a twat, twat.So your making a cash flow point.
Again irrelevant.
By the way,.are you capable of a sentence without swearing ?
steps nearer the grave at leastIt's not the difference that's the problem. It's the lack of any thought or substantiating evidence that's doing you no favours. But carry on because you're obviously getting something out of it.
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
yes. but i always call a twat a twat, twat.
It really is this simple isn't it. Yep, more quantitative easing solves all. In fact lets do away with tax altogether and just print money.
Are you guys serious.