Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Students occupy University of Sheffield Auditorium

They do not create money ( a sub set of wealth ).

And if you think the mere act of borrowing money in itself creates wealth...well...I would have to gve up trying to explain it to you.
 
Your example is disingenuous, at the very least far from the whole picture.

In 2000, the council house I was brought up in (in the 60's and 70's) was on the market for £170,000. I.

That's the north south divide for you, though. Also the urban/rural divide. Until the turn of the century, reasonable basic terraced houses were available in most northern towns and cities for under 30k.

Months rent £300, What planet?!

It's a perfectly reasonable figure for a student bedroom outside London.
 
They do not create money ( a sub set of wealth ).

And if you think the mere act of borrowing money in itself creates wealth...well...I would have to gve up trying to explain it to you.

Of course, there is also the argument that decreasing government spending increases private sector debt, which is a whole lot more risky to the economy than public sector debt.
 
Ah I get it ! At long last.

Absolute genius. So I mention that one of governments functions is to collect a finite amount of tax and spend it on priorities, that they don't create wealth as such. And the genius proclaims I am wrong because they also borrow.

Forgive me, but doesn't this just add to their outgoings (out of the tax take) in the form of debt repayments (plus interest)

In other words. What in earth is your point !!
let's revisit what you actually said:
Please keep in mind...government does not create money. They collect a finite amount of tax and thats all they have available to spend.
yes, they collect a finite amount of tax: but that is not all they have available to spend. i don't know why you're pissing about with the 'government doesn't create money' bit, they do actually (everyone knows the government can print more notes and mint more coins and if that's not creating money fuck knows what is), but i was more concerned with the 'the government can only spend what it collects in taxes' which is fucking nonsense.
 
let's revisit what you actually said:
yes, they collect a finite amount of tax: but that is not all they have available to spend. i don't know why you're pissing about with the 'government doesn't create money' bit, they do actually (everyone knows the government can print more notes and mint more coins and if that's not creating money fuck knows what is), but i was more concerned with the 'the government can only spend what it collects in taxes' which is fucking nonsense.
QE(d)
 
let's revisit what you actually said:
yes, they collect a finite amount of tax: but that is not all they have available to spend. i don't know why you're pissing about with the 'government doesn't create money' bit, they do actually (everyone knows the government can print more notes and mint more coins and if that's not creating money fuck knows what is), but i was more concerned with the 'the government can only spend what it collects in taxes' which is fucking nonsense.

Hmm....thought your argument was that they borrowed...and that this is an infinite resource... Better go back and edit your post....looks like you are changing your tune !
 
Hmm....thought your argument was that they borrowed...and that this is an infinite resource... Better go back and edit your post....looks like you are changing your tune !
i don't care what you thought, being as the pope would love your argument. i never said borrowing was an infinite resource, i said that the taxes weren't all the government had to spend.
 
It really is this simple isn't it. Yep, more quantitative easing solves all. In fact lets do away with tax altogether and just print money.

Are you guys serious.
 
It really is this simple isn't it. Yep, more quantitative easing solves all. In fact lets do away with tax altogether and just print money.

Are you guys serious.
i never advocated printing more money, i simply pointed that the government does indeed create money. perhaps you don't recall in the 1980s when the various m indices were mentioned on the news (i particularly recall m3)
 
i don't care what you thought, being as the pope would love your argument. i never said borrowing was an infinite resource, i said that the taxes weren't all the government had to spend.

Er...yep, they can borrow money.

Er,..but they have to pay it back

= total and utter irrelevance.
 
Er...yep, they can borrow money.

Er,..but they have to pay it back

= total and utter irrelevance.
yes. but they don't have to pay it back for years and years and years: it's not like it has to be back next payday or a week friday. the point stands: taxes aren't the only money available to governments. it's not a fucking huge point, so why don't you give way gracefully and post up some more shite you can be taken to task for.
 
Governments create both money and wealth. They create money by controlling who gets to print currency and they create wealth by building and maintaining infrastructure. It's typical US-libertarian nonsense to say otherwise.
 
yes. but they don't have to pay it back for years and years and years: it's not like it has to be back next payday or a week friday. the point stands: taxes aren't the only money available to governments. it's not a fucking huge point, so why don't you give way gracefully and post up some more shite you can be taken to task for.

So your making a cash flow point.

Again irrelevant.

By the way,.are you capable of a sentence without swearing ?
 
Are you guys serious.

We (as in all those criticising you...which I guess is what you mean) are not the ones saying that money and wealth are the same thing
or that governments can only spend what they raise in tax
or that all well paid jobs are hard
or that the only motivation is personal material benefit
or that we know what everybody else thinks and that they think the same as we do.

If I've missed any of your nonsense out I'm sorry, but you have posted quite a bit of garbage. So it would seem that even if we aren't really serious, then at least we are more serious than you; being consistently more thoughtful and better informed.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
 
What do you folks talk about when people don't come here to offer an alternate point of view ?

Doesn't it get a bit boring ?

It's not the difference that's the problem. It's the lack of any thought or substantiating evidence that's doing you no favours. But carry on because you're obviously getting something out of it.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
 
We (as in all those criticising you...which I guess is what you mean) are not the ones saying that money and wealth are the same thing
or that governments can only spend what they raise in tax
or that all well paid jobs are hard
or that the only motivation is personal material benefit
or that we know what everybody else thinks and that they think the same as we do.

If I've missed any of your nonsense out I'm sorry, but you have posted quite a bit of garbage. So it would seem that even if we aren't really serious, then at least we are more serious than you; being consistently more thoughtful and better informed.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice

Goverments spend what they collect in tax - correct, except for occasionally desperate resorting to QE.
(and if they borrow to spend they have to pay that back too out of tax revenue)
'All well paid jobs are hard' - I have not said this
'The only motivation is personal material benefit' - I have not said this
'I know what everybody else thinks and they think the same as me' - I have not said this

For some reason your brain seems to be putting a made up spin on my comments. Maybe it's you who thinks the above...somewhere underneath the self-righteousness.
 
It's not the difference that's the problem. It's the lack of any thought or substantiating evidence that's doing you no favours. But carry on because you're obviously getting something out of it.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice

No it isn't. You just cannot comprehend a different point of view.

Cheers again.
 
Again, I repeat, do you folks prefer to come here agree on everything ?

It would seems so. All I've seen so far is a foulmouthed tirade of nit picking and some twerp pretending I am somebody else

Have I stumbled intoa forum for teenagers in error ?
 
It really is this simple isn't it. Yep, more quantitative easing solves all. In fact lets do away with tax altogether and just print money.

Are you guys serious.

Has it occurred to you that the problem with QE as it currently stands is that giving money to banks for them to sit on doesn't actually do anything to stimulate demand?
 
Back
Top Bottom