danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
I’m with him. He’s the dude who knows.
Stonehenge Tunnel Poll
- Thread starter ska invita
- Start date
I’m with him. He’s the dude who knows.
Artaxerxes
Look out, he's got a gnu!
The sector is divided with many of them unable to comment for professional reasons
Letter calls for archaeologists to take 'rightful' lead on Stonehenge tunnel
HUNDREDS of archaeologists have signed an open letter calling for professionals to unite and reframe the Stonehenge tunnel debate.
SpookyFrank
A cheap source of teeth for aquarium gravel
No and they should tear up the road that's already there as well.
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
The problem is the works at the entrances.I would have thought most of the tunnel would be below any archeology unless it's going to be a cut and cover tunnel.
WouldBe
Dislicksick
Unless the entrances are going to be right next to the henge (in which case a tunnel would be pointless) then how much archeology is going to be found?
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
Please read the thread and if you’re able watch the video. tl; dr - lots. The stones themselves are not the issue. The whole area is full of archaeology.Unless the entrances are going to be right next to the henge (in which case a tunnel would be pointless) then how much archeology is going to be found?
Spandex
A crazy bulbous punchbag of sound
Unless the entrances are going to be right next to the henge (in which case a tunnel would be pointless) then how much archeology is going to be found?
brogdale
Coming to terms with late onset Anarchism
The most damaging option; obvs
NoXion
Craicy the Squirrel
fucksake
Artaxerxes
Look out, he's got a gnu!
I can remember there being a free festival at Stonehenge every year. The stones belong to the people man! Heck some of the graffiti on the stones is historic
Leave it as it is, no to the tunnel.
Nobody is touching the stones
gosub
~#
thank goodness the number of laylines that would need to be redrawn
WouldBe
Dislicksick
The whole country is full of archaeology. Doesn't every major construction project have to have archeology done like on HS2? Or are we not supposed to do anymore building projects?
cupid_stunt
Chief seagull hater & farmerbarleymow's nemesis.
I was there for the last free festival, my first festival, I was impressed with the stalls with signs advertising all sorts of goodies - various types of hash, grass, shrooms, acid, and speed, but not coke or smack.
After enjoying some shroom tea, another first for me, from one stall, we ended up buying spliffs rolled in front of you, from another stall, because we were too bollocked to roll our own.
Hawkwing, the Magic Mushroom Band, and others were ace on shrooms and decent hash.
It was fucking crazy, no wonder it was sadly stopped.
Last edited:
WouldBe
Dislicksick
And where is the tunnel going?
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
I’ve already answered this.The whole country is full of archaeology. Doesn't every major construction project have to have archeology done like on HS2? Or are we not supposed to do anymore building projects?
Stonehenge Tunnel Poll
I get the arguments both ways I think Im a bit more pro tunnel over all though
www.urban75.net
Spandex
A crazy bulbous punchbag of sound
Monte
You can't say lavatory without saying tory.
Elpenor
Dancing as fast as I can
ska invita
back on the other side
Thanks for the reminder, stones fall forward next month....At least they stopped moving them to adjust for daylight saving twice a year.
WouldBe
Dislicksick
Then isn't it better to dig the route to better understand it?
Can't see the point in archeology if all you're going to do is ponder what's there.
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
The landscape around Stonehenge is examined again and again as more about it is discovered and more refinements of techniques are made. And a dig obliterated by building work can’t be re-examined.Then isn't it better to dig the route to better understand it?
Can't see the point in archeology if all you're going to do is ponder what's there.
ska invita
back on the other side
From memory the dispute comes down to how much damage will be done to possible artifacts in the ground This seems to me to be a matter of technique and procedure.... Can it be done sensitively?
Getting rid of the road from the immediate landscape seems inarguably a positive. Should allow people better walking access to wider area also
Getting rid of the road from the immediate landscape seems inarguably a positive. Should allow people better walking access to wider area also
NoXion
Craicy the Squirrel
Well hopefully it's not true, because that would be a monumentally (heh) stupid decision.
Artaxerxes
Look out, he's got a gnu!
Bear in mind that the route of the tunnel will be dug over in massive detail before its done, vast numbers of archaeologists get spades in the ground ahead of construction projects and this one will be no different.
Its actually good for the sector as it'll get them paid and its good for us because we get to see whats actually under the ground along the route. Layer by layer. If its done properly at least, which admittedly in this country is far from a given.
Its actually good for the sector as it'll get them paid and its good for us because we get to see whats actually under the ground along the route. Layer by layer. If its done properly at least, which admittedly in this country is far from a given.
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
JimW
支那暗杀团
No dig unless necessary seems to be the best practice at the moment, especially as more and more non-invasive techs become available. And for such an iconic world-class site and landscape. it shouldn't even be up for discussion.
