Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
You take it up with the bbcTake it up with the BBC then
You take it up with the bbcTake it up with the BBC then
Yeah, that was my recollection.
And Khomeini died in 1989, so it can't be revoked.
From the description Google just gave me I am an apostate also .. I will revel in my new descriptorNot sure why you would think it would be logical. Rushdie's book was publicly pronounced to be an insult to Islam. What is more, to a certain way of thinking, he is an apostate, which is a heinous crime in itself.
Rot where?Just grim. Religious fundamentalists, with emphasis on the mentalists, deserve to rot in hell.
Blackpool would learn'em proper.Rot where?
Along with 'blasphemy', it is a term that I reject entirely. It is a concept whose validity I do not recognise. Fuck anyone who thinks otherwise.From the description Google just gave me I am an apostate also .. I will revel in my new descriptor
Indeed.Along with 'blasphemy', it is a term that I reject entirely. It is a concept whose validity I do not recognise. Fuck anyone who thinks otherwise.
What's radical about ultra-conformism, a term I think I've just made up,? Don't think for yourself! Do as you're told! Radical my arse.BBC's security correspondent dribbling on about how 'the Rushdie Affair' radicalised a generation of young Muslim men. What utter fucking bollocks. They were already radicalised if they stood up to protest about this book.
Indeed.
There is an Australian comic who goes further although not in a religious way, "offence" so someone says something and you are offended, so what? you are offended, why should I care? Wish I could recall his name, very amusing.
One example of equivocation I remember came from John Le Carré, along the lines that you don't have an absolute right to offend people's religious beliefs.
Slightly ironically, the Chautauqua Institution is asking for people's prayers. Um, they do know Salman's views on religion, don't they?
Yes, it was him, well done you, I love his comedy.Very probably Steve Hughes.
BBC's security correspondent dribbling on about how 'the Rushdie Affair' radicalised a generation of young Muslim men. What utter fucking bollocks. They were already radicalised if they stood up to protest about this book.
Jim Jefferies?Indeed.
There is an Australian comic who goes further although not in a religious way, "offence" so someone says something and you are offended, so what? you are offended, why should I care? Wish I could recall his name, very amusing.
Yes, it was him, well done you, I love his comedy.
Quite right. It's also the case that authoritarian, reactionary, religious beliefs should be discouraged. At the very least.Muslims have the right to believe whatever the hell they want and dress how they like have mosques and Halal whatever. They should be allowed about their daily business without hassle.
They don't have the right to expect others to follow or respect their rules
Slightly ironically, the Chautauqua Institution is asking for people's prayers. Um, they do know Salman's views on religion, don't they?
I'm sure they're just trying to be nice, but he describes himself as a 'militant atheist'. Bit of a bum note in the circumstances.Part of the history of Chautauqua is an effort to bring preachers around to speak as part of an effort to educate the masses in the 19th century. So there's form for it.
Rot where?