brand cld do a good fagin in a production of oliver
Because these mothers are both young, photogenic but maternal - the fact that they are parents does simultaneously limit but also enhance their sexuality (does RB only pose with women?)
I am finding it hard to put my finger on what is so offensive but I think it is not an accident that the New Era was selected above, say, the bedroom tax, asylum detentions or any number of significant issues - although I accept that as a standalone campaign, it has vaildity instead of a more nebulous and less focused action.
Does Caroline Lucas look somewhat uncomfortable and 'invaded'?
you need to widen your vocabulary.WOW! that's a seriously incredible post.
I could be wrong but the new era campaign was started and led by women (the three women in the video?). It was an incredibly strong campaign led by incredibly strong people, and you in a couple of sentences have reduced these women who battled incredibly fucking hard to win their victory to brand appendages in their own campaign.
You've done the very thing people have been accusing brand of doing. Did you listen to what they had to say in the video? Did you hear them talk about their campaign or have you just looked at the image?
you need to like campanula's post, just to be safe.you need to widen your vocabulary.
it is unbelievable and somewhat depressing you seem unaware of synonyms for incredible.you need to like campanula's post, just to be safe.
That's what you get with no GCSEs. So what do you think of these photogenic 'mums' pickmans? Use as many synonyms as you likeit is unbelievable and somewhat depressing you seem unaware of synonyms for incredible.
Shouldn't you be pickmans?I left school without any qualifications. Your point is?
Am I too smart for a prole?
Or cry about everything and keep the inferiority complex.
Because these mothers are both young, photogenic but maternal - the fact that they are parents does simultaneously limit but also enhance their sexuality (does RB only pose with women?)
I am finding it hard to put my finger on what is so offensive but I think it is not an accident that the New Era was selected above, say, the bedroom tax, asylum detentions or any number of significant issues - although I accept that as a standalone campaign, it has vaildity instead of a more nebulous and less focused action.
Does Caroline Lucas look somewhat uncomfortable and 'invaded'?
Are you still being pickmans?Am I too smart for a prole?
Or cry about everything and keep the inferiority complex.
it's to me strange you can use words like appendages which are rare but use incredible / incredibly several times in a short post rather than obvious alternatives like very, unbelievable or remarkably. i don't believe it has anything to do with your qualifications. anyway i've made my point and don't see anything to be gained by continuing this sidetrack. as for my view of the e15 mums i think it interesting brand's so keen on jumping on that bandwagon when there were and are lots of less famous people who've done rather more for them. atm it may seem useful to be associated withis auld sexist but he'll clearly jump the shark soon.That's what you get with no GCSEs. So what do you think of these photogenic 'mums' pickmans? Use as many synonyms as you like
judging from that he's no man but an angelftr Brand has previously posed with men..
for the record i didn't give you a telling off.Are you still being pickmans?
Left school with no qualifications still got no qualifications (save for cscs card and pat testing certificate) and I'm getting a telling off from a university librarian about having a limited vocabulary.
Class act
In what way is it constructive?Urban slagging someone who does something constructive shocker!!
Further confirmation, if any were needed.Anecdotal data (people who post about him positively on my facebook feed) suggests a strong crossover with people who voted Lib Dem at the last general election.
I left school with minus qualifications. There, I'm the proliest.
erratum: for 'your' read 'you're'.you spelt 'there' correctly. your disqualified. get to the front of the class with the other swots.
erratum: for 'your' read 'you're'.
says the man who fell for cleggmania hook line and 'I agree with nick 'sinkerUrban slagging someone who does something constructive shocker!!