there are very few people below the age of 15 with any gcsesHopefully, very
& very few people over 44 have any gcses.Hopefully, very
You judge and find Brand deficienct, but if anyone ventures an opinion who isn't authorised so to do on your terms, they are making an illegitimate claim to entitlement.
Buggirinhell they were called "northern counties" when I was at school.& very few people over 44 have any gcses.
Yeah no idea, just chucked in a few gcses to indicate thick - lacking in intelligence or erudition. By accident. Or just because that's who you are now.I've no idea about Brand's educational background btw. For all I know he may have a drama degree. The point is the gap between the pretention and the reality.
Indeed, he has no grounds to judge brand on his academic achievements other than the glory of his own and the bubble he knocks around with. What cushy job is her ladyship doing this time, at what university articul8?
when i started school they were o levels. when i left they were gcses.Buggirinhell they were called "northern counties" when I was at school.
If you really want to go down this road, there is no such thing as critique without a normative basis, and norms imply the possibility of judgement.No-one has judged him, his motivations, aims and utterances have been questioned.
Now, I realise that such critique and analysis are lamentably under-used in your bubble, but that doesn't excuse your conflating critique with judgement.
Here we go again, you consider him thick and un-erudite therefore he must have only a few gcses. You cannot grasp this at all can you?I've no idea about Brand's educational background btw. For all I know he may have a drama degree. The point is the gap between the pretention and the reality.
If you really want to go down this road, there is no such thing as critique without a normative basis, and norms imply the possibility of judgement.
Sprogwhen i started school they were o levels. when i left they were gcses.
Not far off, since the early/mid-eighties. It's the scraggy beard makes me look haggard and past it, honest.
That's you that is. And it means you're a nazi. (!)A 2010 study actually found that men were reverting to more masculine ways of behaviour in response to the recession. The self-grooming metrosexuals were giving way to a more rough and ready aesthetic. Witness the contemporary renaissance of the beard.
It's not just about ego or winning the argument, to me it's about getting to the bottom what actually went on.
I have not insinuated that you're anti-Irish.
Who has said he's thick? I've not. I've suggested he's not as clever as he makes out, or the erudite figure the mass media promotes him as. Someone like Morrissey, who left school without quals, had (or has) much more substance, and yet he wasn't feted as for his political ideas in the same way.Here we go again, you consider him thick and un-erudite therefore he must have only a few gcses. You icannot grasp this at all can you?
Hopefully, very
you remind me of the bourbons, who famously learned nothing and forgot nothing. only you'll have to work harder on your memory.
You did - and then in a following post equated erudition with intelligence. You're a mess. Stop.Who has said he's thick? I've not. I've suggested he's not as clever as he makes out, or the erudite figure the mass media promotes him as. Someone like Morrissey, who left school without quals, had (or has) has much more substance, and yet he wasn't feted as for his political ideas in the same way.
Brand had enough time to check who he was sharing a platform with. Doesn't take long.
TBF they took the biscuit.
It's inherent to asking me if I'm mocking the Irish language, or asking me if I have a problem with the Irish language.
And no, you suggested another poster was wrong on his erudition - not the mass media. And the basis for this was his lack of gcses. That trick (poster/mass media won't work)Who has said he's thick? I've not. I've suggested he's not as clever as he makes out, or the erudite figure the mass media promotes him as. Someone like Morrissey, who left school without quals, had (or has) much more substance, and yet he wasn't feted as for his political ideas in the same way.
could you list yr qualifications so we can all work out whether we're more erudite than youIf you really want to go down this road, there is no such thing as critique without a normative basis, and norms imply the possibility of judgement.
Again on the white van. That begs the question of whether (aesthetic) mimesis can constute critique in itself. In that instance the normative basis was ascribed rather than immanent to the image.
I could, but I'm sure you would cite that as evidence in favour of my argument that the two are non-identical!could you list yr qualifications so we can all work out whether we're more erudite than you
He means can copying an image be critique in itslef. And that in in this case everyone else was wrong because they spotted what the posh lady thought and was doing (i.e they have real life experience of what it meant). He didn't.Again on the white van. That begs the question of whether (aesthetic) mimesis can constute critique in itself. In that instance the normative basis was ascribed rather than immanent to the image.
She took a picture. What the picture "means" cannot necessarily be determined without making assumptions about what she must have meant by it.What the fuck does this even mean?!
Yeah so people made assumptions - correct assumptions. It's called inductive logic. Life operates on it. Some of them deductions are based on social experience.She took a picture. What the picture "means" cannot necessarily be determined without making assumptions about what she must have meant by it.
What? In a 'Hello Russell, did I forget to tell you I was a fash, ah, sorry about that' kind of way?