Are you doing a routine right now?
Have the IWCA had a big shift to the Right?
Are you doing a routine right now?
What butchers said. It's a mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship. The celeb thrives on publicity, attention and fame; the sun sells papers, clickthroughs and whatnot. He used to work for them didn't he?
His thing with Paxman has over 10 million views on youtube. Make of that what you will.Fair enough, I just didn't think he was getting that much attention in the press for what he was doing, outside of various appearances to sell his book and the odd newsnight/C4 news spot that's probably off the radar of most of the population, but then I don't watch much telly so don't know where else he's been popping up. It's like they're giving him more attention and attacking harder than I though he would warrant, that's all. It's not like he's in any danger of starting a movement or anything.
As 'hypocrisy' goes it's fairly tame, there are more significant political figures guilty of far far worse, even allowing for the context of what he's been speaking out about, but I suppose 'celebs' sell a story more.
he's in the vein of plan b
convinced me that people from leeds can rap, even though you wouldn't credit such a thing
His point was that they love to keep foisting hate figures on the public - a manner of two minute hate i suppose - modern day bogeymen, whether it be asylum seekers or child murderers "I made up my mind about Ian Huntley when he abducted and killed those two girls, I don't need constant reminders of how evil he is - 'Oh no, Ian Huntley has been found with voodoo dolls in his cell, what a shame - I liked him!'".one of his funnier rants as standup was talking about the sun 'You ever grow up with a mate who you realise you really fucking hate?'
or similar Youtube will have it
Max Keiser is sewage.
who you talking about
I haven't really been following this thread that closely, but the fact we have a 38 page thread on Russell Brand, rather than a 38 page thread on the topics he says he wants to highlight, speaks for itself.
The level of Russell Brands output 'The Trews' is prolific.
And much of what he says is true, espec exposure of people like Philip Green, Fox News, Walmart, etc.
Max Keiser is perhaps more 'highbrow' but a bit gruff and cocky for my liking.
Russell Brand is good enough for me.
If you aint read it, I recommend reading 'The Passionate state of mind' and 'The True Believer' by Eric Hoffer, on the nature of mass movements. They are also written in straightforward and clear English that is acccesible to everyone.
You are selling yourself short and by implication a lot of other people too; aspire to more.
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
aspiring to revolutionary purity is a fine and noble thing, and you must be complimented on your ascent to such heady climes p), but while the rest of us trudge around grappling with everyday realities such as they are, the apparent age and outlook of the people i see engaging with Brand on soc. media etc is encouraging in the here and now : the raw anger, the bristling refusal to be preached at cos of their 'don't vote' positions ( maybe 'learnt' from Brand in some cases, but it's not a difficult proposition to take on), the awareness of the systemic cause of their relative lack of prospects etc -
Brand, for all his inconsistencies / daftness, seems to have become one of the focal points for a generation of young oppositionists/potential oppositionists who have no illusions in Labour, none in the SWP, and apparently very few in the idea of never ending growth delivering them a brighter future. And for the time being, he doesn't look to be doing anyone else's job for them by coralling these (relative) youngsters down any ideological cul de sacs, or pretending to have all the answers.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/cel...ro-to-zero-Russell-Brands-biggest-gaffes.html
Another offshore owned media giant calls time on brand as one of the beautiful people. the indy is still giving him fair crack of the whip and the Beeb has booked him for a QT with Farage
Or a little bit 80's Bono.Its John Lennon all over again isn't it?
In Nicaragua it's...well, it's the sexiest revolution I ever saw. Women in khaki uniforms standing on corners and... well, I don't like anyone with an Armalite rifle, but they were standing there smoking cigarettes and looking like Miss World."
aspiring to revolutionary purity is a fine and noble thing, and you must be complimented on your ascent to such heady climes p), ...
Not recently....He used to work for them didn't he?
Brand, for all his inconsistencies / daftness, seems to have become one of the focal points for a generation of young oppositionists/potential oppositionists who have no illusions in Labour, none in the SWP, and apparently very few in the idea of never ending growth delivering them a brighter future. And for the time being, he doesn't look to be doing anyone else's job for them by coralling these (relative) youngsters down any ideological cul de sacs, or pretending to have all the answers.
Seriously, fuck right off with your snide comments about "revolutionary purity".
Even assuming that Russell Brand's heart is 100% in the right place, there are people posting here (and I don't include myself among them) who know more, have done more and have achieved more of real and genuine significance than he is ever likely to do.
In saying that, I'm in no way having a dig at Brand or saying that he shouldn't attempt to do things he things are worthwhile in whatever ways seem appropriate to him, but the idea that no-one should dare to criticise aspects of what he's doing, that we should just gratefully accept his recent decision to become a celebrity activist as if no-one can, could or has done anything without him to show us the way buys into the worst sort of elitest shit which is a huge part of the obstacle we have to overcome.
diane9 has done it to very insulting effect on the last few pages of this thread.( The smiley was supposed to have signified I was being less than serious about 'revolutionary purity', but good to see the old humour by pass in action, nice one)
As for " the idea that no one should criticise aspects of what he's doing" , you'll have to point me in the direction of that particular straw man, must have missed it, cos I can't see anyone, anywhere even beginning to suggest that .
She's done it to everyone that even dares doubt though. And that attitude is now real. And that's the fight now support RB or spit in the face of the 96. I want no part of that filth. Any talk about social housing - nah, defend RB,attack the sun/ attack RB.Ok, obviously didn't see that, maybe he could take that up with them , + just stick to his po faced hissing at me for whatevs.
Ok, obviously didn't see that, maybe he could take that up with them , + just stick to his po faced hissing at me for whatevs.
Maybe you should read the thread you're contributing to before making comments referring to "revolutionary purity", you silly cunt
Ooh, I used a smiley, that means I can later claim I was being less than serious about calling you a silly cunt...