danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
No.You are the author?
No.You are the author?
What are 'the universal values of humankind'?Good post.
"We surely have to start from a point that recognises the universal values of humankind and the positive impacts that human society produces (while not ignoring the damage that humans can cause)."
That absolutely must be the starting point.
Yes let's sort this out once and for all then there will be a lot less arguments.What are 'the universal values of humankind'?
FEWER!!Yes let's sort this out once and for all then there will be a lot less arguments.
Good post.
"We surely have to start from a point that recognises the universal values of humankind and the positive impacts that human society produces (while not ignoring the damage that humans can cause)."
That absolutely must be the starting point.
What are 'the universal values of humankind'?
(my emphasis)...
The only way I have ever seen unity develop which was otherwise not there has been through building trust...it took time but was achieved by focusing on common needs/purpose...
That was redsquirrel's phrase, but for me there is a universal basis to work on. We're social animals, and like other social animals we have an inherent sense of empathy, fairness, altruism, solidarity, community spirit. I think these things are the basis of a built-in 'moral' system: a set of social skills and attributes that evolved with us and in order to meet our circumstances. It is a biological feature of our being. (For more on that see Stephen Jay Gould, Frans de Waal and others). That is what is already there to build on. It is capable of overcoming our capacity for the opposite of all those attributes.What are 'the universal values of humankind'?
We could learn a thing or two from bonobos about how to get along with one another (and I mean more than just having constant sex!). We're also social strivers, which is more like chimps than bonobos, but we're more like bonobos than chimps in the way that we keep juvenile traits into adulthood.That was redsquirrel's phrase, but for me there is a universal basis to work on. We're social animals, and like other social animals we have an inherent sense of empathy, fairness, altruism, solidarity, community spirit. I think these things are the basis of a built-in 'moral' system: a set of social skills and attributes that evolved with us and in order to meet our circumstances. It is a biological feature of our being. (For more on that see Stephen Jay Gould, Frans de Waal and others). That is what is already there to build on. It is capable of overcoming our capacity for the opposite of all those attributes.
I haven't read it. But I have been meaning to.We could learn a thing or two from bonobos about how to get along with one another (and I mean more than just having constant sex!). We're also social strivers, which is more like chimps than bonobos, but we're more like bonobos than chimps in the way that we keep juvenile traits into adulthood.
If you've not read it, I hugely recommend Carl Safina's Beyond Words, which touches on some of this. He calls it 'self-domestication', and sees it as an ongoing process within modern humans.
That was redsquirrel's phrase, but for me there is a universal basis to work on. We're social animals, and like other social animals we have an inherent sense of empathy, fairness, altruism, solidarity, community spirit.
Totally off-topic now, but it's the single best book on animal behaviour that I've read, and I've read quite a lot. He adopts exactly the attitude that I would adopt - sure, we shouldn't anthropomorphise, but the opposite danger is possibly even worse, and indeed absurd - the danger of considering humans to be outside the process somehow and assuming that other animals do not have any of the mental traits that have evolved in us just because we can't prove they have them, even when it's the obvious answer. He makes a strong argument that these kinds of assumptions, normally made in the name of scientific rigour, are in reality deeply unscientific.I haven't read it. But I have been meaning to.
Imagine if you gave chimps guns and religion *takes bong hit*or do chimps and that all get along in a happy little bubble of empathy and fairness?
No, but bonobos largely do.or do chimps and that all get along in a happy little bubble of empathy and fairness?
Imagine if you gave chimps guns and religion *takes bong hit*
No, but bonobos largely do.
Bit of mutual masturbation normally eases any tensions.what about when they encounter foreign unknown bonobos?
I recommend The Bonobo and the Atheist by Frans de Waal.what about when they encounter foreign unknown bonobos?
what about when they encounter foreign unknown bonobos?
everyone always goes rose tinted when talking about monkeys being our cousins, that dont mean only the good traits of humanity.
they lie they steal they kill. just like we do.
Bit of mutual masturbation normally eases any tensions.
Make up sex is the best kind.
Yeh I was going to say, pretty sure that chimps and stuff eat their enemies a fair bit more than humans mostly do. Not saying humans NEVER do it.only with their own tribe, they eat the ones they've fucked up from fighting. classy.
Not sure this monkey business is taking the discussion anywhere, really.
Yeh I was going to say, pretty sure that chimps and stuff eat their enemies a fair bit more than humans mostly do. Not saying humans NEVER do it.
Yep to all of that as long as we can still calmly discuss the propensity of folk to be swayed, influenced or duped by neoliberal, cultural hegemony.For me the anti-humanism that has become so prevalent (I don't know about anyone else but I hear stuff like "most people are idiots" quite commonly) is a major reason for this crumbling of solidarity. We surely have to start from a point that recognises the universal values of humankind and the positive impacts that human society produces (while not ignoring the damage that humans can cause).
If most people are idiots, many racists, people naturally selfish, humankind only capable causing damage then the individualism of neoliberalism becomes a rational choice.
if you're including bonobos in your 'and stuff', you're wrong. Fair bit of confusion here between bonobos and chimps.Yeh I was going to say, pretty sure that chimps and stuff eat their enemies a fair bit more than humans mostly do. Not saying humans NEVER do it.