Wilf
Slouching towards Billingham
Surprised he didn't throw in 'get back to Russia'.Paid by the union barons! He's pulling out all the classics now isn't he, absolutely desperate even against Starmer's beigeness.
Surprised he didn't throw in 'get back to Russia'.Paid by the union barons! He's pulling out all the classics now isn't he, absolutely desperate even against Starmer's beigeness.
Peter Oborne pretty much one the money here, for me at least:
Boris Johnson is finished. But will the rotten system that created him fall too?
Yeah fair enough that is pretty derisory but he says a lot of other things which are imo, nail on the head.I can't really get past the opening sentence of the second paragraph tbh
The United Kingdom was long admired for its gentle tolerance and respect for the rule of law.
"The Charge of the Light Weight Brigade" OK I give Starmer that
What's your preferred scenario?
- Ceausescu speech from the balcony
- Musso going full spectrum George Formby
- Gaddafi in a drain
- Saddam in a hole
Yep, I'm no fan of Parliament watching or even Parliamentary politics, but when John Smith and then even Blair used to wipe the floor with John Major, it felt like it had some significance. Suppose it fitted into a wider attack that was being mounted by the opposition.I haven't watched PMQs in years (decades probably) but in doing so right now I'm astonished at just how bumbling and rubbish Johnson is under 'pressure' from Starmer.
I've obviously no time for Starmer, but he flattened him there.
Not that it makes a shred of difference to anyone or anything mind.
He should quit politics and do the working mens clubs, decent comic timing.Blackford is so much better at this.
How many times has he said "team" though?Javid far more damaging than anything in PMQs
I haven't watched PMQs in years (decades probably) but in doing so right now I'm astonished at just how bumbling and rubbish Johnson is under 'pressure' from Starmer.
I've obviously no time for Starmer, but he flattened him there.
Not that it makes a shred of difference to anyone or anything mind.
Come now. Corbyn may have had some strengths as the leader of the Labour Party, but providing entertaining theatre at PMQs was not one of them. The high viewing figures for BBC parliament during his tenure were because there was some sense in which what was debated in that period could result in a defeat for the government, and the massive constitutional crisis that was going on.Starmer has never learned (or had the personality to exploit) that the only way PMQs ever raises an eyebrow is when it's entertaining theatre with actual feeling behind it. Which is why Corbyn at the dispatch box coincided with the most watched period BBC Parliament ever had.
that really was a pretty good speech i think. And never heard the place so packed & quiet.Javid far more damaging than anything in PMQs
Oh he wasn't a good speaker but there was a sense of drama and real feeling about it, which kept it vaguely interesting. Starmer on the other hand has all the feeling of a sensory deprivation tank.Come now. Corbyn may have had some strengths as the leader of the Labour Party, but providing entertaining theatre at PMQs was not one of them. The high viewing figures for BBC parliament during his tenure were because there was some sense in which what was debated in that period could result in a defeat for the government, and the massive constitutional crisis that was going on.
It sounded like a leadership pitch to me.that really was a pretty good speech i think. And never heard the place so packed & quiet.
For all Johnson's faults, Javid would be worse for the average person in this country.It sounded like a leadership pitch to me.
the sense of drama was down to the political moment - brexit mostly - rather than Corbyn thoughOh he wasn't a good speaker but there was a sense of drama and real feeling about it, which kept it vaguely interesting. Starmer on the other hand has all the feeling of a sensory deprivation tank.
Corbyn's rise, the curiosity around him, the palpable hatred of the Tories (along with his own backbenches) for his presence and the presence of active vaguely left-wing rhetoric as a significant factor in the House were all contributors to the drama, I'd argue. I don't think Brexit alone was driving it.the sense of drama was down to the political moment - brexit mostly - rather than Corbyn though