Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

PM Boris Johnson - monster thread for a monster twat

hmm .. well if other people were fined for attending that event when johnson wasn't - or even if nobody was fined - then I suspect whoever was in charge of the met investigation will have to resign. Which also begs the question - what the fuck were the plod doing when they presumably saw this exact photo and knew it was going to published?
 
hmm .. well if other people were fined for attending that event when johnson wasn't - or even if nobody was fined - then I suspect whoever was in charge of the met investigation will have to resign. Which also begs the question - what the fuck were the plod doing when they presumably saw this exact photo and knew it was going to published?
they really don't want to be privatised, do they?
 
According to newsnight, the Sue Gray report will be wednesday! It better be in the morning. But It won't be will it :mad:.
Peter fucking Bone still saying it was a work event. FFS.
 
Any chance of an archive version of the above, please?

The type is too small for me on Twitter :oops:, and I've forgotten how to paywallbust .... Thanks! :)
https://www. thetimes.co.uk/article/boris-johnson-pictured-with-drink-at-lockdown-party-bhvwjn8hh

That's the broken URL of the article, the original headline was 'Boris Johnson pictured with drink at lockdown party' and it was published at 4.45pm (see here archive.ph), the headline was changed at 10.30pm to 'Partying Boris Johnson ‘misled Commons’, and the preview I get on The Times site shows the article was also edited.

Trouble is the URL wasn't changed and had already been saved on the archive.ph site, which is not letting me save it again. :(
 
Oh, hang on, I've found a work-around, I put the broken URL in (excluding-https://www), and it's resaved it!

Here's the new link - archive.ph

Meanwhile, The Times has been told that Johnson suggested Gray should drop her plans to publish her report during a secret meeting with him earlier this month. Steve Barclay, his chief of staff, was also said to have been present.

“He asked her, is there much point in doing it now that it’s all out there?” a Whitehall source said. “He was inferring that she didn’t need to publish the report.” Another added: “They were exploring this idea of not having any report. It was being talked about [in Downing Street]. But politically they realised they couldn’t do it.”

Gray has found herself at the centre of a briefing war in recent days after No 10 wrongly claimed that she had instigated the meeting with Johnson.
 
Just waiting for all those spineless wanker scum whose mantra was “waiting for the Sue Gray report” to now turn to the by-elections as justification for their craven enabling. And so the frog is slowly brought to the boil.
 
Back
Top Bottom