Theisticle
Well-Known Member
Stupidity wrapped in layers of thinly-veiled bigotry
As is so often the case, the more people try to dress up bigotry as reasonable and rational the more angry it makes me. Simply being ignorant I can understand, but when you've sat down and tried to bend the world out of shape so it fits in with something shit that you've already decided to believe, that's deliberate and knowing and there can be no excuse for it.
SpookyFrank said: ↑
Five'll get you ten these same parents don't give a shit about not being consulted on any other aspect of the curriculum.
Stupidity wrapped in layers of thinly-veiled bigotry
Dr Siema Iqbal argues that schools have no right to impose lifestyles and beliefs on children because that is the parent’s job.
Judging people based on their actions is not bigotry. As I'm sure you know, I was referring specifically to the parents who are protesting against lessons on basic acceptance and inclusivity. Try again, and this time think with your brain and then post.
Problem is that your relativism on this doesn't work. The only 'value' being imposed here is the idea that diversity exists and should be acknowledged, with a background assumption that there is nothing wrong with being gay. Maybe there is also within that class a discussion of men and women and what girls and boys can aspire to, with a background assumption that men and women are equal. Suppose that a group of parents objected to the idea of showing examples of women being engineers or doctors because according to their values a woman's place is in the home and girls should be brought up in a way that will make them obedient to their husbands. Would you take the same stance towards that issue? If not, why not? What is it about gender equality that is deserving of respect that sexuality equality does not have?There really is no excuse for dressing up bigotry as reasonable and rational!
Problem is that your relativism on this doesn't work. The only 'value' being imposed here is the idea that diversity exists and should be acknowledged, with a background assumption that there is nothing wrong with being gay. Maybe there is also within that class a discussion of men and women and what girls and boys can aspire to, with a background assumption that men and women are equal. Suppose that a group of parents objected to the idea of showing examples of women being engineers or doctors because according to their values a woman's place is in the home and girls should be brought up in a way that will make them obedient to their husbands. Would you take the same stance towards that issue? If not, why not? What is it about gender equality that is deserving of respect that sexuality equality does not have?
My bigotry? Go on, show it to me.My comments are about your bigotry, not that of the parents protesting.
My bigotry? Go on, show it to me.
My bigotry? Go on, show it to me.
lolI thought you were Spooky Frank responding, and I have already exposed his. You'll have to wait for this evening when I'll have time to sift through your posts. If memory serves me right, it won't be too difficult.
That's would surely depend on whichever group they're targeting for recruitment right nowHave the vanguard of the new identity politics, the SWP, said anything about this, any SWSS meetings?
Asking for a friend?Have the vanguard of the new identity politics, the SWP, said anything about this, any SWSS meetings?
When a kid is beaten up in the playground for being gay, who is the real victim?
tim, I know you don't see why and you may be puzzled by the bluntness of this judgement, but your position on this is contemptible.
Ironically enough Pakistan is the number one consumer of gay pr0n in the world, or at least it was a couple of years ago.Homosexuality is much less accepted in Islam. At my kids primary there was serious misgivings about this ‘many shaped families’ message. Liberal ideology promotes multiculturalism but doesn’t have answers for when those cultures have different concepts of morality.
Nothing is more important than ensuring our children’s education continues uninterrupted. Yesterday, both parents and the trust held constructive discussions with the Regional Schools Commissioner, and as a result of these discussions we are eager to continue to work together with parents, over the coming days and weeks to find a solution that will support the children in our school to continue their education in a harmonious environment.
“Until a resolution has been reached , No Outsiders lessons will not be taught at Parkfield and we hope that children will not be removed from school to take part in protests.”
It looks to me more like a strategic move by the school to take the wind out of the sails of the protests. I hope I’m right about this anyway.
Now this lot have won I would be surprised not to see more of the same elsewhere.
You've got this so wrong it's painful to read.What? The authorities listening to ordinary people (deplorables) concerns. Don't count on it!
You've got this so wrong it's painful to read.