tim
EXPLODED TIM! (Help me!!!)
Far too Authoritarian for me. And anyway I had some previous experience of just how unpleasant Galloway could be.Were you in Respect Tim?
Far too Authoritarian for me. And anyway I had some previous experience of just how unpleasant Galloway could be.Were you in Respect Tim?
You asked about "having the shit beaten out of you" for who you are. Unpalatable as I may find his opinions, I'm not aware Geert Wilders has made a career out of literally beating the shit out of Muslims. I don't need a lecture about that there being populist politicians who exploit Islamophobia, in repose to my answer to your question.
Islamophobes who beat up Muslims don't justify their actions with "they are threatening our secular values". Usually they are yobs who just need another reason to beat someone up. Most Muslims who get assaulted or murdered for their beliefs, get attacked by people of a different religion, sometimes even by fundamentalist Mu
slims who interpret the Koran differently.
Your narrative of self-identified secular mobs beating up Muslims is a fantasy.
We're not so far historically from where Russia is now. Clause 28 was only repealed in 2003. And Russia shows how it is possible to go backwards on these matters as well as forwards. Allowing religious bigotry to trump gay rights would be a step backwards.
Wilders like politicians in France use "secularism" as a dog-whistle garner racist support.
Islamophobes who beat up Muslims don't justify their actions with "they are threatening our secular values". Usually they are yobs who just need another reason to beat someone up. Most Muslims who get assaulted or murdered for their beliefs, get attacked by people of a different religion, sometimes even by fundamentalist Muslims who interpret the Koran differently.
If these had been parents in middle-class conservative white catchment area this would not have created this level of vitriol
You live in Germany. Whatever other values they espoused, the National Socialists imposed an overtly secular regime. Not all those running the camps were "yobs", it didn't stop them murdering Jews, gays and other minorities for the greater good.
The Stalinists weren't to keen on minorities, either.
You live in Germany. Whatever other values they espoused, the National Socialists imposed an overtly secular regime. Not all those running the camps were "yobs", it didn't stop them murdering Jews, gays and other minorities for the greater good.
The Stalinists weren't to keen on minorities, either.
I'm not that keen on anyone who wants to impose their views on anyone. You seem to want to impose your supposedly "secular" views on those around you, and I'm not convinced that l want them imposed on me. Why should I trust you and your values than anyone else peddling a set of beliefs that I find unpalatable.
The parent of a 10-year-old admitted her views differed from her husband’s: “My husband is a strict Muslim and my son asked him about the difference between what the school says and our religion. He did not give him a good reply. My reply was that God has created us and he is the only one who can judge us. I have told my son that it wouldn’t matter if he came home to me and said he was gay, you are my son and I will love you no matter what.”
If a bunch of white people from the suburbs started complaining about how a teacher was telling their kids stuff that contradicted the quran I think the intial reaction would be one of sheer bewilderment tbh.
“We are not a bunch of homophobic mothers,” she said. “We just feel that some of these lessons are inappropriate. Some of the themes being discussed are very adult and complex and the children are getting confused.
Muslims are a very easy target but, but frothing on about this all being about religion/Islamic bigotry ignores the fact that such views are held in plenty of other sections of society
If their objection had centred on the mentioning of diversity and same-sex relationships, it would have attracted exactly the same amount of vitriol from me. Take your hypocrisy hunting elsewhere. It doesn't work here.Except parents being unhappy about the sex education curriculum in primary schools isn't a particularly religious issue, is it? If these had been parents in middle-class conservative white catchment area this would not have created this level of vitriol
There is never a reason for bigotry at the school gates | Kenan Malik
I was struck by this quote from a 2016 Guardian report that Kenan Malik links to in his article. The obvious point is that there are fault lines in families and communities. The religiously conservative aren’t speaking for everyone.
I'm sure parents are divided, but the fact that it's hundreds of parents involved rather than a couple of dozen indicates that the school has not managed this well. I don't buy the idea that these parents are all crazy bigots.
There was nothing more than bigotry evident from that TV debate, but it's fair to say that not all parents from the school were there.
I think at this point it may be very hard for parents who don’t support the protests to come out and say anything in public.
It was a bit of a frustrating debate really. Here’s the opinion of the woman who spoke at the start.
Salma Yaqoob, formerly of Respect, seemed to defend the parents on The Big Questions, maybe with a bit more nuance, the parents weren't consulted' anyone else note this.
Except parents being unhappy about the sex education curriculum in primary schools isn't a particularly religious issue, is it? If these had been parents in middle-class conservative white catchment area this would not have created this level of vitriol
The cake makers certainly unleashed serious twitter anger
Birmingham primary school in LGBT row cleared by watchdog
Inspectors said there was a “small, vocal minority” of parents who believed the school’s equalities curriculum focused disproportionately on LGBT issues and was not taught in an age-appropriate way, but they found no evidence to support this.
They said their inquiries revealed that most Parkfield parents supported the curriculum and understood the school was helping their child to play a positive role in modern British society.
Almost all of the parents who completed Ofsted’s questionnaire, Parent View, and who spoke with inspectors share the school’s vision and are happy with the quality of education the school provides. You and your staff have forged positive links with parents. You have done this by inviting parents to assemblies and workshops and to observe lessons. You have also put on classes for parents that include childcare, information technology and English for speakers of other languages. The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) and the early years leader, for example, engage positively with parents to support pupils’ learning. The education, health and care plan process and annual reviews help to make sure that pupils with SEND receive the right support at the right times and do well. The SENCo works effectively with a wide range of health and care agencies to make sure that children at Parkfield are well supported.
The majority of parents understand how the school helps their children to play a positive role in modern British society by developing their appreciation of British values. However, a very small, but vocal, minority of parents are not clear about the school’s vision, policies and practice. This group of parents feel that staff do not sufficiently listen to their concerns. Their view is that the PSHE education and equalities curriculum focuses disproportionately on lesbian, gay and bisexual issues and that this work is not taught in an age-appropriate manner. Inspectors found no evidence that this is the case.
Well,it does like it is an element of the parents, maybe the numbers were boosted by outsiders.
And hard to judge without having some training and experience as a teacher or other educator.It's hard to judge without seeing what particular parts of this programme the parents are objecting to.