Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Protest outside Old Bailey in support of Constance Marten & Mark Gordon

My thought is they are someone who has had kids taken off them by social services - and we do know sometimes the authorities get it wrong.
But in the case referred to in this thread, if social services had been able to remove the child, it might still be alive.
 
You honestly think folk who refer to filmed child sexual abuse as child porn are going ‘haha’?
Terminology matters. Someone calling child abuse materials "child porn", is both trivialising child sex abuse (and the recording of it) and corrupting porn, which (some may differ), does at least encompass legitimate expressions of sexual activity.

It's why I prefer the term "child sexual abuse" over things like "paedophilia", because the former describes exactly what is happening, rather than smudging it out into a phenomenon.

Also, there is a strong correlation between those who view child sexual abuse materials, and those who go on to commit child sexual abuse. It makes complete sense to refer to them in that way.

I don't think anyone's instantly start launching a flames-and-pitchforks attack against the term "child porn" any time soon, though.

Yes, this was a pretty deliberate derail. So sue me :cool:
 
My thought is they are someone who has had kids taken off them by social services - and we do know sometimes the authorities get it wrong.
But in the case referred to in this thread, if social services had been able to remove the child, it might still be alive.
I mean, it's just blatantly obvious, isn't it? I'm gobsmacked anyone can think otherwise.

Like you say, its the classic conspiraloon confusion of sometimes and always.
 
Don't feed the troll.

Don't feed the troll.

Don't feed the troll.

This creep is looking for interaction, it's what pushes this thread further up the chart on the Google algorithm so it reaches more lunatics/monsters.

Don't feed the creep.

Don't feed the creep.

Don't feed the creep ...

Unfortunately, on 14 March 2024, it was claimed that the prosecution was "about to collapse, when , when anyone who had been following this ongoing criminal trial (or anyone who is capable of searching the internet for reports on it) would already have been aware that the case for the prosecution had closed two weeks earlier at the end of February (2024).

Far from being "about to collapse" on 14 March 2024, the prosecution of the two defendants continued at the Old Bailey today with one of the defendants continuing to be cross-examined.
 
Constance Marten's barrister is making his closing speech. The jury will be probably be sent out either on Friday morning or possibly on Monday.
Expect acquittals on all the three harm charges and the perversion of justice charge.
The only other charge is concealment of birth. There's a chance they'll be convicted of this. The maximum sentence is two years. They've served nearly 14 months on remand.
Hopefully they will be acquitted on all five charges, walk out the front door of the Bailey, and then sue for the multiple crimes that have been committed against them, including malicious prosecution.
If they are convicted of concealment of birth, I doubt the state will want to set them free right away, giving publicity to parents who have stood up for themselves, and for humanity, against the SS. They will find some excuse to hold them for a while longer and then let them out of a prison gate somewhere without notice, so there's no film.
But... EXPECT VICTORY SOON!
 
Constance Marten's barrister is making his closing speech. The jury will be probably be sent out either on Friday morning or possibly on Monday.
Expect acquittals on all the three harm charges and the perversion of justice charge.
The only other charge is concealment of birth. There's a chance they'll be convicted of this. The maximum sentence is two years. They've served nearly 14 months on remand.
Hopefully they will be acquitted on all five charges, walk out the front door of the Bailey, and then sue for the multiple crimes that have been committed against them, including malicious prosecution.
If they are convicted of concealment of birth, I doubt the state will want to set them free right away, giving publicity to parents who have stood up for themselves, and for humanity, against the SS. They will find some excuse to hold them for a while longer and then let them out of a prison gate somewhere without notice, so there's no film.
But... EXPECT VICTORY SOON!
Hello Charlotte F1, Seventy-seven, Was77 and +78.

Again. Why is this horrible case so important to you and why must urban bear testament to your hot takes on it?
 
Constance Marten's barrister is making his closing speech. The jury will be probably be sent out either on Friday morning or possibly on Monday.
Expect acquittals on all the three harm charges and the perversion of justice charge.
The only other charge is concealment of birth. There's a chance they'll be convicted of this. The maximum sentence is two years. They've served nearly 14 months on remand.
Hopefully they will be acquitted on all five charges, walk out the front door of the Bailey, and then sue for the multiple crimes that have been committed against them, including malicious prosecution.
If they are convicted of concealment of birth, I doubt the state will want to set them free right away, giving publicity to parents who have stood up for themselves, and for humanity, against the SS. They will find some excuse to hold them for a while longer and then let them out of a prison gate somewhere without notice, so there's no film.
But... EXPECT VICTORY SOON!

You ended with capitals AND in bold..... I'm convinced!
 
You ended with capitals AND in bold..... I'm convinced!
Sarky one-liners are so intelligent, internet boy. I doubt anyone ever convinced you of anything you didn't start off thinking.
The emphasis was to express my hopefulness about imminent victory.
 
Constance Marten's barrister is making his closing speech. The jury will be probably be sent out either on Friday morning or possibly on Monday.
Expect acquittals on all the three harm charges and the perversion of justice charge.
The only other charge is concealment of birth. There's a chance they'll be convicted of this. The maximum sentence is two years. They've served nearly 14 months on remand.
Hopefully they will be acquitted on all five charges, walk out the front door of the Bailey, and then sue for the multiple crimes that have been committed against them, including malicious prosecution.
If they are convicted of concealment of birth, I doubt the state will want to set them free right away, giving publicity to parents who have stood up for themselves, and for humanity, against the SS. They will find some excuse to hold them for a while longer and then let them out of a prison gate somewhere without notice, so there's no film.
But... EXPECT VICTORY SOON!
Hi. And bye.
 
Back
Top Bottom