Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Paramedics doubt Dr Kelly's 'suicide' cause

Stanley Edwards said:
Not to mention the microchips :D x3

Again, I feel the need to point out that your inability or unwillingness to inform yourself, or your lack of understanding regarding a subject, does not make those who do proport to know something about it ":D Insane :D".

If you wish to debate from a position where you assume that your own knowledge and experience is so great that nothing has ever fallen outside of it, please let me know, so I can save myself the bother of engaging with such an arrogant, closed mind. ;)
 
Justin said:
Is this fucking thread still going? Couldn't some agent of the State possibly have it killed?
Strangely enough, despite their formidable powers to put together hugely complex intermnational conspiracies to snuff out dissent, they are somehow unable to stop people revealing 'the truth' on websites.
 
editor said:
Strangely enough, despite their formidable powers to put together hugely complex intermnational conspiracies to snuff out dissent, they are somehow unable to stop people revealing 'the truth' on websites.
Although when I made some posting on the thread earlier (much earlier) this week, my PC crashed immediately I'd done it.

Honest. The posting never appeared.

Until I logged in again and had a second go of course.
 
editor said:
Strangely enough, despite their formidable powers to put together hugely complex intermnational conspiracies to snuff out dissent, they are somehow unable to stop people revealing 'the truth' on websites.

There is no need for overt censorship with people like yourself on hand.
 
Backatcha Bandit said:
And your description of him as an 'ambling bobby' is not.

You idiotic, tedious, pedantic, misleading windbag.
Aw, no need to throw a hissy fit because you got your facts wrong!!!

But you want to watch those insults you keep throwing around.

They're not very nice, you know.

But could you help me by ticking off who is now involved in this wonderful evidence-free plot:

1.the UK government
2. the US government
3. a low ranking Abingdon country bobby
4. The Abingdon police
5. the Masons

Anyone else?
How about the pathologists? Are surely must be in on it too?
 
Backatcha Bandit said:
There is no need for overt censorship with people like yourself on hand.
What comments of yours have been 'censored' in this thread?

You made the claim, now back it up, big mouth.
 
From my personal experience the police in Abingdon couldn't find their backsides with their bare hands.

Dealing with lads lobbing glasses about down the river is too much for them on the whole.
 
Backatcha Bandit said:
And your description of him as an 'ambling bobby' is entirely incorrect.

You idiotic, tedious, pedantic, misleading windbag.
Why? Was he not ambling around the area?

I see no mention of him running around.

Whoops! You've screwed up again, haven't you?!
 
editor said:
But you want to watch those insults you keep throwing around.

They're not very nice, you know.

I want to 'watch' it, do I? Why? Are you threatening me or something?

Those insults are the exact ones you directed at me, so if poor lickle diddums editor is offended by them, tough shit.

I notice that you still cling to your demonstrably incorrect description of DC Coe as a 'bobby'.

Edit: As for 'ambling', this is entirely unfounded conjecture on your part.
 
Backatcha Bandit said:
I notice that you still cling to your demonstrably incorrect description of DC Coe as a 'bobby'.
A librarian writes....

A Dictionary Of Slang defines "bobby" thus:
Noun. A policeman/woman. The name derives from the pet form of the Christian name of Sir Robert Peel, who established the present British police organisation.
Note there is no reference here to the rank of the officer.
 
editor said:
Why? Was he not ambling around the area?

I see no mention of him running around.

Whoops! You've screwed up again, haven't you?!

This is class.

No mention of him 'running', therefore he must be 'ambling'.

Logic really isn't one of your strong points, is it?
 
Backatcha Bandit said:
I notice that you still cling to your demonstrably incorrect description of DC Coe as a 'bobby'.
.
Wrong again!

This is fun watching you squirm and being too pompous and too arrogant to admit to your silly blunder.

(editor awaits more hissy fit insults)
 
A Detective Constable, dressed in black combats and a polo shirt, who was not part of the search team, who was not where he was supposed to be, who 'just happened' to be the first police officer to attend the scene of a high profile death with international repercussions, who then goes on to lie to the inquiry regarding the number of other officers (?) he was with at the time:

= 'ambling bobby'?

On planet 'Fucktard', perhaps.
:rolleyes:

The reason I pulled you up on this bizzare description is that it is a) misleading, b) based entirely on your own speculation and c) based on some sort of wierd fucktard logic.

You tend to use a lot of misleading and emotive language when you're shown to be wrong.

Now...

TVP Tactical Support Major Incident Policy Book: Operation 'Mason' Between 1430 17.07.03 and 0930 18.07.03, DCI Alan Young - not for release - Police operational information
http://www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.uk/content/evidence-lists/evidence-tvp.htm

Care to speculate on the nature of this 'Tactical Support', or perhaps the nature of the 'Major Incident' in the TVP's area that started hours before Kelly was even reported missing?

Edit: It will have to be speculation, as the documents, while listed, were not released.
 
editor said:
1.the UK government
2. the US government
3. a low ranking Abingdon country bobby
4. The Abingdon police
5. the Masons

Anyone else?
Don't forget Mike Yarwood (for the taped interview with Susan Watts) ;)
 
editor said:
Still waiting for a reply on your wild claims about "censorship"....

to be fair i think he is saying that when there are people like you who, in his eyes, accept what they are told by the media then why do you need censorship?

rather than that you have censored him here.
 
tommers said:
to be fair i think he is saying that when there are people like you who, in his eyes, accept what they are told by the media then why do you need censorship?

rather than that you have censored him here.


thats how i read it, too...
 
Earlier I wrote:
Backatcha Bandit said:
http://www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.uk/content/evidence-lists/evidence-tvp.htm

TVP Tactical Support Major Incident Policy Book: Operation 'Mason' Between 1430 17.07.03 and 0930 18.07.03, DCI Alan Young - not for release - Police operational information
Care to speculate on the nature of this 'Tactical Support', or perhaps the nature of the 'Major Incident' in the TVP's area that started hours before Kelly was even reported missing?

Edit: It will have to be speculation, as the documents, while listed, were not released.

Speculation on this matter would apper to be unneccessary:
Thames Valley Police has told the Daily Mail that the Operation Mason file details their investigation into the circumstances surrounding Dr Kelly's death.

Sue Reid, The Daily Mail 3/6/04

So it would appear that the Thames Valley Police 'investigation into the circumstances surrounding Dr Kelly's death' began a full hour before Dr Kelly even left his house. :confused:

Now, does that seem a trifle odd to anyone else, or am I going ":D insane :D"?

-

Edited in the name of World Peace. ;) LOL @ Justin below :D
 
lookitup.jpg
 
Backatcha Bandit said:
I'm still waiting for you to comprehend the statement you are refering to, idiot.
Ah right.

So when you refer to my 'censorship', you're actually referring to the fact that you're free to post up any fact-free conspiracy theory you like, for free, on a high profile bulletin board that I run for no profit.

And you get to continually insult me with moronic personal abuse with each post!

Thanks for clearing that up.

Maybe I should show you what real 'censorship' is because I'm running out of reasons why I should continue to provide you with a free outlet for your pathetic abuse.
 
Back
Top Bottom