Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Latest doubts about 911 commission: Former Vice President calls for "Phase 2"

I don't know why you are confused Khan Unis. Of course it's a personal question. It's not a sensitive one and fine to ask once but no-one can demand an answer to it (as editor does with all manner of questions), it's none of their business.
I can't 'demand' anything of you, but if you bring up something yourself as proof of your argument, it's entirely reasonable to ask for details.

But we both know why you won't do that in this particular instance - it's because you've hit the 'self-pwn' button again and haven't got the honesty to admit it. Hence the big sweary mouthed hissy fit here.
 
For goodness sake what is the problem with saying what brand of water you drink?

I drink Volvic by choice or Highland Spring, but I avoid Evian because it spells naive backwards.

Does that help?
And is anyone going to bother answering my innocent enquiry?
 
Or you could swing the argument around and ask why none of the conspiraloons have sued the many, many debunkers who have publicly ridiculed their claims.

Sure, that's what I could do.
But I won't.
 
And is anyone going to bother answering my innocent enquiry?
I've already answered your vital point about why the loon DVD churners don't get sued and I'm not sure what your point is with the other question.

But just to clear something up: when you said, "There are a lot of pretty convincing films and books out there" (about 9/11 conspiracies) you weren't actually expressing your own opinion, but, err, someone else's, yes?
 
Sure, that's what I could do.
But I won't.
Ah. You're here to play.

I'm not sure its going to help the thread survive much longer though, but the good news is that there's thousands upon thousands of posts archived in the loon forum. I'm sure you'll have no problem finding the answer to just about every possible 9/11 question there.
 
Editor, I am finding the search tool causes problems. I did look for legal and libel and defamatory threads but found nothing related to 911 threads.
I didn't come here to annoy people, just to ask people their opinions.

If this is a difficult or emotional issue here then I'll respect that and not ask about 911 again.
Even though there is an interesting debate to be had.
 
Do you decide which threads get put into the archive of loon forums?

Can I start one that won't?
If you start a new thread that contains solid, credible new evidence from credible sources rather than the usual wild speculation that's already been discussed to death here already, sure.

But if you're here just to repeat the same old tosh and can't be arsed to read the many, many threads already on the subject, it'll be bin bound in no time.
 
As you can see from this photo, a design feature of the towers was that office space had 360 views around a central core of lift shafts and stairwells, it is hardly as if the whole building had to be rigged. The central load bearing core could easily and covertly be rigged by men on abseiling ropes in the lift shafts.
2co0cn9.jpg
 
As you can see from this photo, a design feature of the towers was that office space had 360 views around a central core of lift shafts and stairwells, it is hardly as if the whole building had to be rigged. The central load bearing core could easily and covertly be rigged by men on abseiling ropes in the lift shafts.
Gotta love the fantasy imagery lifted straight out of the "and all because the lady loves milk tray" advert. Priceless stuff!

Anyhow, I fear that this latest piece of frighteningly ill-informed loon-babble might has to mark the end of this thread.

In the loon forum you will learn exactly what is involved in preparing a major building for demolition and it involves just a tad more than few invisible blokes secretly flying about in lift shafts.

Goodbye, dear thread.
 
Back
Top Bottom